Martin

Sésquac
  • Content count

    1,076
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

287 Outstanding!

About Martin

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Contact Methods

  • Have you ever had an encounter with a sasquatch-like creature?
    No
  1. In response to MIB's question: 1) Charles Darwin is one example of a naturalist. nat·u·ral·ist (năch′ər-ə-lĭst, năch′rə-) n. 1. One versed in natural history, especially in zoology or botany. 2. One who believes in and follows the tenets of naturalism. 2) I cite the Cascades Carnivore Project as an example of naturalists doing in depth studies in an alledgedly squatch rich environment In response to MIB's question: 1) Charles Darwin is one example of a naturalist. Steve Irwin is another example. nat·u·ral·ist (năch′ər-ə-lĭst, năch′rə-) n. 1. One versed in natural history, especially in zoology or botany. 2. One who believes in and follows the tenets of naturalism. Here is a link to the NW Naturalist Journal. http://www.bioone.org/loi/nwnt 2) I cite the Cascades Carnivore Project as an example of naturalists doing in depth studies in an alledgedly squatch rich environment .
  2. The woods are full of naturalists that study the very areas that supposedly have bigfoot populations. Any one of them would love to document a new species of insect..... A 9ft 1000lbs North American squatch would be second only to the discovery of the Galapogos Islands.
  3. The Erickson Project was exposed when the photo of Matilda, that claimed to show a clear picture of bigfoot, was shown to be nothing more that a Chewbacca mask. Claims are that Erickson was duped by footers for some $600,000. I believe Moneymaker is on record as holding up Matilda as genuine and the picture that lead to his claims of bigfoot having a dog type nose. I believe that the project Bodhi referenced was the ill fated Falcon Project which was championed by Dr. Meldrum.
  4. Looks like a cameraman who knew he was in danger of being caught on film.
  5. If I am not mistaken there was a Ronnie Smith that posted here a long long time ago on BFF 1.
  6. ^ Where can I find the documentation of the "Khwit" skull that is not on a crypto website? Thanks in advance.
  7. What are helicopters and cameras going to give us that we dont already have!!!!?? Crazy. Thanks for sharing. I had no idea that sort of money was being thrown around. But aviation is expensive. Rapid response for one. Urgency is one thing footers don't seem to be interested in. If Peter Byrne and his backers had urgency? They would have been pro - kill. So you race out there with a helo and take a top down PGF video with prop wash blowing dust and tree tops around? And then present it to science with a cherry on top? Sure The outcome is predictable. It doesnt matter how fast you respond......if your not commited to collected physical evidence? Epic Fail. Another failure in a long list for sure. Hopefully someone will get it right during my lifetime.
  8. What are helicopters and cameras going to give us that we dont already have!!!!?? Crazy. Thanks for sharing. I had no idea that sort of money was being thrown around. But aviation is expensive. Rapid response for one. Urgency is one thing footers don't seem to be interested in.
  9. Interesting also that Franzoni created at least 1 published paper regarding the search. To scoff at his work is to shows incredible naivety.
  10. http://www.bigfootencounters.com/interviews/franzoni.htm $5,000,000 grant to Byrne in 1993. Slick was long gone.
  11. University grant for bigfoot. Nothing, zero, ziltch. Footers try to argue whether it was used effectively but it can't be argued that serious $$ were granted and spent. Henri Franzoni became a para-squatcher due to the fact that they looked so hard and found nothing. He put heaps of faith in Indian lore.
  12. ^ Byrne got millions of financing.
  13. Peter Byrne got $5 million to search for bigfoot.
  14. 1) How much time and money? What do you think the return on investment would be in total $$ for discovery? Time shouldn't be much of a problem with the activity some groups claim to experience. 2) I often wonder if there aren't other motives besides jealousy and greed? By watching and listening we can learn a lot about human nature. You can also learn from reading boards and watching videos as well. I suspect that the most obvious reasons for not sharing info isn't greed and jealousy. 3) Who are these well funded shadow groups that don't share? Thanks