Guest Crowlogic Posted September 28, 2014 Share Posted September 28, 2014 A trip around you tube seems to bear out something I've been saying for a long time. For well over a dozen years the general public has had a remarkably good set of technologies to capture photos and videos. A result of this is the plethora of UFO documentation on image capturing devices. Even with hoaxing aside there is a huge collection of data that defies easy explanation. We see today far more UFO shots than ever before which coincides well with the development of camera availability. The Bigfoot phenomenon hasn't given the expected surge in pictorial data. True there are more than ever but none of them are dramatic enough to attach much weight to. If there is anything to the case for Bigfoot we should be getting at least a half dozen PGF quality videos a year. There is something about the numbers that doesn't add up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest crabshack Posted September 28, 2014 Share Posted September 28, 2014 Other than clouds not much obscures the view of objects in the sky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Crowlogic Posted September 28, 2014 Share Posted September 28, 2014 Other than clouds not much obscures the view of objects in the sky. Understood but the overall ratio of capture should coincide. Seems we has 1000 times more UFO capture now which dovetails nicely with the surge in capture devices yet the BF ratio is scarcely higher than it was 30 years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Painthorse Posted September 28, 2014 Share Posted September 28, 2014 "More population out and about with an unobstructed view of the sky" vs the amount of people out in the woods on any given day. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 28, 2014 Share Posted September 28, 2014 UFOs seem to stick around around for longer too. Also, the distance that they can be seen from is much greater. It would be interesting to compare these to 'ghost' photos/vids. (Paranormal trifecta) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Crowlogic Posted September 28, 2014 Share Posted September 28, 2014 The ratio of human activity is the same as it's always been. There are more people and way more cameras. there should be at least a mile uptick of credible BF image captures. Vast amounts of wilderness outing captures appear on the net all the time. People are out there but is BF? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest crabshack Posted September 28, 2014 Share Posted September 28, 2014 (edited) A fleeting glimpse or "I was so scared to move because it looked like it wanted to eat me" is not conductive to good photos or video. The UFO's don't seem to care that they are seen, many are over major population areas, squatches usually put major effort into not being seen by humans. Edited September 28, 2014 by crabshack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeafTalker Posted September 28, 2014 Share Posted September 28, 2014 (edited) There is something about the numbers that doesn't add up. Maybe the problem isn't the way the numbers do or don't add up, but your belief that numbers mean something. If the only tools you have for understanding the universe are addition and subtraction, you will have a lot of unanswered questions in your life. Maybe it's time for some qualitative analysis. If you get out there and look and see, there will suddenly be only one number that means anything to you anymore: The number 1. All you need is one sighting, one experience. Then you will see how meaningless numbers really are. Edited September 28, 2014 by LeafTalker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyO Posted September 28, 2014 SSR Team Share Posted September 28, 2014 If there is anything to the case for Bigfoot we should be getting at least a half dozen PGF quality videos a year. Says who and why ? What have UFO's got to do with Sasquatches and why on earth would anything regarding numbers in anyway intertwine with Sasquatches ? The logic of these particular points you're trying to make are grossly flawed Crow in lots and lots and lots of ways. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Crowlogic Posted September 28, 2014 Share Posted September 28, 2014 The math should be producing more and better evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incorrigible1 Posted September 28, 2014 Share Posted September 28, 2014 I agree. Sorry, ain't buying the "ufo's are easy, but bigfoot is difficult." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hiflier Posted September 28, 2014 Share Posted September 28, 2014 (edited) Hello All, There's a lot of junk in the sky. UFO by and large means unidentified.......it dosen't mean not man made. I've never seen an UFO and being an astronomy buff I look up a lot! Just in the past coupe of weeks I probably saw a dozen satellites zoom by and some really high altitude objects with binoculars. Nope, no saucers, eliptoids, motherships, orbs, or a myriad of other shapes reported. Oh yeah,....uh....no Bigfoot either. Must be me. Edited September 28, 2014 by hiflier Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Holliday Posted September 28, 2014 Share Posted September 28, 2014 it would be a kick to find out the squatches are piloting the UFOS after all.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeafTalker Posted September 28, 2014 Share Posted September 28, 2014 The math should be producing more and better evidence. "Math" doesn't produce evidence. Your eyes do that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonehead74 Posted September 28, 2014 Share Posted September 28, 2014 (edited) "Math", in this case, describes a facet of the evidence. Edited September 28, 2014 by Bonehead74 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts