Jump to content

Bigfoot Vs. Motor Vehicles: Any Credible Evidence?


bipedalist

Recommended Posts

Guest MikeG

Well, if it is of any use in relation to purported BF behaviour, the above is EXACTLY the situation with animals in Africa.

Most game viewing vehicles are open, and many many lion & leopard sightings are from very close range.......say 15 or 20 feet, or closer. So how is it that the lion doesn't see all this nice juicy meat sitting perched on seats on the vehicle with absolutely nothing but fresh air between the predator & the possible prey? Well, provided that you don't stand up or talk too much, the lions, leopards etc don't seem to recognise a vehicle as something that carries people......they just recognise it as a vehicle, a single entity.

Tens of thousands of generations of lions have never seen a motor vehicle, so their brain doesn't compute it very well, I guess.

Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...
On ‎1‎/‎22‎/‎2012 at 4:52 PM, bipedalist said:

 

All I will say is this:  I have read more than a couple I have no significant reason to doubt.

 

Again, to a scientist, "reason to doubt" means evidence that the incident did not happen as described.  (Say, the hairs in the bumper test out deer.) Period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd forgotten to add that if not all of them several (or most) WERE ON THE BFRO SITE.

 

Sometimes "credible" is misused (like "evidence" is.)  BFRO frequently uses "sounds/seems credible" of witness reports. Any report that, given what one knows, seems like it could have happened is perforce credible.  If BFRO posted it, ...it's credible.

If it reads that way to me, now.

Edited by DWA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • masterbarber locked and unlocked this topic
  • masterbarber locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...