All Activity

According to the news video “I don’t know” was the term used from the beginning. As for the calcaneus at the heel it definitely has a heel seen on the right foot that’s definitely going deep in fall leaves. To claim anything else would be seeing things not provided by the evidence. Cub photo from earlier standing at the same location missing its foot proved leaves were deep and covering all feet from a complete view. No toes or claws can be seen on anything that was there that day.

Meet Sasquatch Sunset's Endearingly Weird Bigfoot Family in This Exclusive Clip GizmodoView the full article

Sasquatch Sunset ReelviewsView the full article

The Best Bigfoots and Sasquatches the Big Screen Den of GeekView the full article

👍

got it

It is not a Sasquatch. Again, the camera had a factory setting of one image every 30 seconds. 30 seconds is a lot time for an animal to enter and leave a bait station. That format can be limiting for ID and locomotion observations. It was cost effective to monitor for deer, bear, turkey or ground hogs. An image does show that the target did not have an elongated Calcaneus at the heel = not a Sasquatch. I have had a lot bear images: walking forwards, walking backwards, doing a spin and turn move to change directions, walking on a log etc. I deleted most of them. It is a blobsquatch to be fodder for social media. At the end of the day, there is an expression that works: " I don't know". 'I don't know' is a good answer. For those of you who want to burn more time, find out if Mr. Jacobs sold his Bushnell camera on ebay and bought a Reconyx brand camera. That time period would probably be an RM45, RC55 or an old Silent Image. Carry on.

I am open for it to be one of the three options. Bigfoot being the least of them, however, I am not willing to definitively say it is one or the others.

All the more for you to bear.

I'm not a bigfoot expert because I have never seen one . I have seen plenty of black bears because my state is loaded with them and get them crossing my property many many times every year . I know some say it could be a black bear with mange and it's true mange can make animals look really weird sometimes . I'm on the fence because in my opinion the two photos do not look like a cub with mange .It's just impossible to tell really what type of animal it is. The length of the limbs just look way too long to be a black bear . Escaped exotic animal from a owner ? maybe a chimp ...who knows

A few pictures from yesterday's hike.....some interesting impressions, what do you see, more thank one critter? Sotol snack discards, a new Cattail pond, and a very weird bone arrangement that wasn't there last week.

Next Time You See Bigfoot, It's Probably Just Rob Lowe OutdoorsView the full article

Smoky Mountain Bigfoot Festival collides with Star Wars Day for fun-filled event Elizabethton.comView the full article

There are not one but TWO images.

Says the steering guy whose contribution is trolling.

There were two images and it was tiny. There are no other clear images of a youngster.

‘Sasquatch Sunset’ Interview: The Zellner Brothers Talk Their Absurdist Bigfoot Comedy With Riley Keough And Jesse Eisenberg Punch Drunk CriticsView the full article

How Jesse Eisenberg Became A Poetic Beta-Male Bigfoot in Sasquatch Sunset GQView the full article

I don't think these photos are anything at all Bigfoot. I say this so everyone who disagrees can skip over the rest of this. For everyone else... It seems a lot is made of this video when we see- for whatever reason- something weird or odd. Right off the bat, since a Bigfoot sighting would be a rare event anyway, whatever it might be is very unlikely to be Bigfoot. There can't be many bigfoot out there should it exist. The odds of hooking one has to be assumed rare. If an area had reported recent activity, then I might see it as a slight increase in possibility but still one heck of a long shot. If we take the challenge to explain what we see on this vid/pic, it doesn't matter if we get it right or wrong if it's NOT bigfoot. The point of it being a concern to us and esp. those on the BFF is the idea of it being Bigfoot. If the image ends up being a normal animal (bear) at some odd angle or even some escaped monkey, the point is it will end up being something other than Bigfoot. If it's not bigfoot it really doesn't even matter what it is. The entire point is to determine how likely it is to look like bigfoot or suggest it even could be? Does it walk like a duck and squawk like a duck? Those who are convinced it is bigfoot can share why there is only one image? Why is it in order to see this as could-be-maybe bigfoot we need to have bigfoot doing Yoga poses or we need this to be some sort of juvenile bigfoot? I just bet if bigfoot would show up at a feeding station any pic taken would look pretty obvious as either bigfoot, some ape like figure suggesting a man in a suit, and so on.

I wouldn’t call that blurry for a nighttime 2007 Game Camera photo? Any photo gets pixilated when you zoom in to look for pimples.

That's one heckuva black kettle.

Sasquatch Sunset’ offers surreal delights in a romp through Bigfoot buffoonery NOLA.comView the full article

I will agree the camera resolution on the photo sucks, which is why its silly to stick to one specific aspect, since its blurry crap. Blobsquatch? But big game hunters are claiming its a chimp without proof and hiding behind name calling....

The Bear hunter at the end of this video knows it wasn’t a bear. Bear simply can’t bend straight down from the hips and tuck their head like it has.

Murder trial begins for noodler who feared Bigfoot was going to eat him Oklahoman.comView the full article