Jump to content

Why Does Patty Look Nothing Like This....


Guest Bipedal Ape

Recommended Posts

Guest Bipedal Ape

Why does Patty's proportions look nothing like the classic bigfoot shape shown here:

Bart_s_thermal_pics.jpg

This is the classic bigfoot shape reported, notice the short legs, long arms etc...

Why does Patty (and all videos come to think of it) look like the proportions that could be created by a human in a suit? That includes the height too.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest MikeG

One is female and maybe old, maybe overweight, (maybe from recently giving birth), whilst the other could be male and in the prime of life, and is anyway CGI .

Who is going to come up with the comparative images of Robert Pershing Wadlow and a pygmy, or Arnold Schwarzeneger and a size 0 supermodel?

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Twilight Fan
Why does Patty (and all videos come to think of it) look like the proportions that could be created by a human in a suit? That includes the height too.

Maybe because all sightings are created by humans in suits, trying to PUNK the witness? :D It's possible

Link to post
Share on other sites

Patty is a female, and what you have posted is the silhouette of what many would call a male Bigfoot. I think, with enough research, you might be able to confirm that human silhouettes are also different based on gender. Let us know how it goes!

Link to post
Share on other sites

What about the above image makes you think it was intended to be accurate? Why don't you also ask why Patty didn't pose humorously like in the above image?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Crowlogic

I think the "classic" BF shape came along after the PGF when it had entered popular culture. Patty IMO looks more possible than animals that seem to have the build of professional wrestlers or iron pumping gym rats.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why does Patty's proportions look nothing like the classic bigfoot shape shown here:

This is the classic bigfoot shape reported, notice the short legs, long arms etc...

Why does Patty (and all videos come to think of it) look like the proportions that could be created by a human in a suit? That includes the height too.

Could you post the photogrammetric analysis that verifies this? (CGI need not apply). Thanx.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest parnassus

Why does Patty's proportions look nothing like the classic bigfoot shape shown here:

This is the classic bigfoot shape reported, notice the short legs, long arms etc...

Why does Patty (and all videos come to think of it) look like the proportions that could be created by a human in a suit? That includes the height too.

Because Patty is Bob Heironimus in a costume, while the popular image is a product of imagination.

Edited by parnassus
Link to post
Share on other sites
Incorrigible1

Could you post the photogrammetric analysis that verifies this? (CGI need not apply). Thanx.

Waiting.....waiting.....

Edited by Incorrigible1
  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Incorrigible1

I think some are waiting, whilst others have already made up their minds. This is true of both "sides."

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Dudlow

B) Squatchy, like people, seems to come in many different body morphologies: Endo-, meso- and ectomorphic.

Additionally, there is the strong possibility of multiple species or sub-species with the potential for hybridization.

So perhaps the 'classic' version of the Squatch we so often refer to is nothing more than an idealized rendering of a more broadly expressed body type.

Dudlow

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...