Jump to content

Reasons Not To Consider The Pgf A Hoax (2)


Recommended Posts

SweatyYeti

Since William Roe's sighting report has been mentioned so many times, in these PGF threads....here is a seldom-seen picture of William... :) ...

 

WilliamRoe_zps33e958c8.jpg

 

 

Here is a link to the article, where I came across it...

 

http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/daniel-perez-on-william-roe/

 

 

 

And, since I've posted those...here is a clip from 'Bigfoot: Man or Beast'...in which his daughter Myrtle appears...(at about the 7:30 mark)...

 

Edited by SweatyYeti
  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
xspider1

Reason # 29452138-3 not to consider the PGf a hoax is this modern reconstruction of a Bigfoot caught on camera:

 

post-131-0-19591700-1394079435_thumb.jpg

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUea74xcAYg

 

The above isn't really too bad in the scope of things, and yet, I think we can see how the above is in stark contrast to the Patterson-Gimlin Film, can we not?

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Stan Norton

And this is not even an accurate depiction of the event it is supposed to recreate...the animal is moving in the wrong direction for one thing!

Link to post
Share on other sites
SweatyYeti

Reason # 29452138-3 not to consider the PGf a hoax is this modern reconstruction of a Bigfoot caught on camera:

 

attachicon.gifOklahoma-Casino-BF-reconstruction.jg

 

 

The above isn't really too bad in the scope of things, and yet, I think we can see how the above is in stark contrast to the Patterson-Gimlin Film, can we not?

 

 

Sure, I'd say there's a pretty distinct difference between Recon-Rug and Patty also, xspider... ;) ...

 

 

Reconstruct2B_zpsd20d17a7.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...
kitakaze

Reason # 29452138-3 not to consider the PGf a hoax is this modern reconstruction of a Bigfoot caught on camera:

 

Are you showing a reconstruction attempt of Patty?

Link to post
Share on other sites
kitakaze
 

Here are the pictures, put together into an animation...  :) ...

 

GlasserBigfootAG1_zpsbb7ed520.gif

 

 

 

There is definitely some movement on the subject's face...though, it looks like there is some possibility it's a flexible mask. But, the eyes do look amazingly realistic. 

 

 

Here is a cropped version...

 

 

GlasserBigfootAG4_zpsfed238bd.gif

 

 

47AE83EC-7EA3-44B9-AA3F-74E55315B1D8.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites
SweatyYeti

^

 

"It blew me away when I first saw it"... :lol:

 

http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w28/SweatyYeti/Fun/KitzoEyeball1.jpg

 

 

And then kit says this regarding 'detail' in the PGF...

 

The film can never be reliable evidence of Bigfoot. 

 

 

So, to summarize kitakaze's 'take' on the PGF...  :aikido: ...

 

The tiniest of details to have ever been "found" in the PGF....the "iris and pupil" in Patty's right eye, is described by kit as a "perfectly valid observation"....and..."useful for the discussion"......when, 'any and all details' on Patty...including the largest ones....."can never be reliable evidence".  

 

 

I see....  EYESEEYOU2.jpg.....it all makes "perfectly valid" sense... 

 

StoogesRunAG4.gif

 

 

 

So, are you showing anything, kit....or, just continuing to "grace us" with your "reliable" talk?? :)

Edited by SweatyYeti
  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
xspider1

Are you showing a reconstruction attempt of Patty?

 

No.  I never said I would do that but, you did.  Does your latest dodge of the Science still include plans to make a reconstruction?  And/Or, do you still intend to show Us the original suit?  Of course not.  Your claims are all over the place, and nothing.

 

I have never claimed to be actively constructing a suit...

 

kitakaze, on 07 Jan 2011 - 6:39 PM, said:snapback.png

"... I am doing a recreation of the suit in my documentary project. "

 

Sorry, that can't go both ways.  You either make a suit or, find a suit and show it, or you don't.  'You don't' seem to be the operative words there.

Edited by xspider1
  • Upvote 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
Doc Holliday

nicely done xspider......whats  the old line from Sir Walter Scott?  ..... "Oh what a tangled web we weave when we practice to decieve."  :good:

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
xspider1

Thank-you, Doc H!      :nomention:  The PGf Hoax conspiracies are a tangled web indeed.  With the newest Science indicating (more than ever) that the PGf was not and could have been a hoax; it's difficult to accept the ideas that: 'the suit would be easy to replicate if anyone really tried' and that 'a better suit could be made for $200, $500, or other random dollar amounts since the champions of such notions have nothing convincing to show what-so-ever.  Some may never accept the evidence for things which have no current, 100% accepted explanation but, as far as I can tell, that's the way it has always been. 8  )

Edited by xspider1
Link to post
Share on other sites

So. we can all say>>>PGF footage will never prove BF exists, all debates on SUITS notwithstanding?

Having FAILED to capture similar footage in almost 50 years...?

Oh yes...we haven't been looking in the right places...Patty will never to ever caught ever again!

Learned her lesson!

Edited by ronn1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Backdoc
BFF Donor

Ronn 1,

 

When a child was lost in wooded park of WVA, it took 1200 volunteers 6 days with cops, tracking dogs, and night vision gear to find the autistic boy who wanted to be found.  The search area was.....less than 3 mile radius.

 

It's not Patty who has learned a lesson in hiding, it is people who need to improve their tactics and efforts in searching based on this real world example. 

 

You may be right and you may be wrong.   Your basis for being dismissive does not match the reality of the demonstrative evidence needed to find someone/ thing in the woods based on this real world example.

 

Backdoc

Link to post
Share on other sites
Backdoc
BFF Donor

(and at one point they had up to 6,000 volunteers.  What kind of effort has been put into trying to find Bigfoot?  Based on this, what kind of effort might be required?)

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • gigantor unlocked this topic
×
×
  • Create New...