Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
kitakaze

Gimlin/Heironimus Interviews Analysis By Deception Detection Expert.

Recommended Posts

Guest

Sweaty has already done so. The measurements he is talking about are proportional in nature, which is height irrelevent. Or taken from scaled photographs comparing fixed points of reference.

He is trying to work out a more or less exact height for Patty...what Sweaty is doing is scaling Patty and Bob to matching heights and comparing fixed points of reference...which show that Bob's proportions do NOT match Patty's.

So you don't have any accurate measurements.

Thank you for confirming this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Incorrigible1

One can lead a horse to water.......

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SweatyYeti
Mulder, on 08 April 2011 - 08:51 AM, said:

Sweaty has already done so. The measurements he is talking about are proportional in nature, which is height irrelevent.

Or taken from scaled photographs comparing fixed points of reference.

He is trying to work out a more or less exact height for Patty...what Sweaty is doing is scaling Patty and Bob to matching heights and comparing fixed points of reference...which show that Bob's proportions do NOT match Patty's.

So you don't have any accurate measurements.

Thank you for confirming this.

As Mulder said....the comparisons of Patty to Bob H....(and other humans)...involve not only body 'lengths', but body 'proportions'.

And we absolutely can get good, meaningful measurements of Patty's actual skeleton, to compare her skeletal proportions to other human's skeletal proportions.

For example...these points are all unaffected by a suit and/or padding...so they must be points on the subject's actual skeleton...whether that be a 'man-in-a-suit', or a real animal...

The 'eye socket'....the elbow-joint....and the knee-joint...

PattySkeletalPoints1.jpg

The knee joint...and the bottom of the foot...

PattySkeletalPoints2.jpg

The backbone...(located by the dark line)...

PattySkeletalPoints3.jpg

Whether Patty is a real animal, or a 'man-in-suit'...the backbone must line-up with that dark line running up the back.

We would also know where the 'top of the skull' is...whether Patty is a human, or not.

If Patty is a guy-in-a-suit...the top of the man's head would have to be 2-3 inches below the top of the pointed 'suit head'.

In making comparisons to Bob Heironimus, that 2-3 inch difference can be adjusted for, very easily...and accurately.

That is quite a bit of information, regarding the actual skeleton of whatever/whoever Patty is. From those points, a lot of body lengths and proportions can be measured...and with a high degree of accuracy.

Edited by SweatyYeti

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

why? was only the suit seen "if true" but the rest of the said embellishments are not seen with it, stands to reason you would hide the lot as a whole part, because they are the suits make-up, and why? the illogical need to take that long trip up and down to retrieve the said suit shortly after,when the said hoax would not be revealed until later! easy enough to stash out of view.

would a masters hoaxer, do such? make a unnecessary trip! leave the main evidence of a hoax in the hands the guy that wore it! and then making that long trip back home hoping "but did not know! were it was left "stashed". it makes little or no sence.

BH, needs first to be asked many probing question on his account of what took place! you have to ask! just what did his two polygraphs taken are of any worth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Crowlogic

Yes giving Bob H the suit to take back to Yakima makes no sense. The suit was the smoking gun. Now are you going to entrust the smoking gun to someone that you plan on stiffing out of the money you've promised them? There was plenty of places for Roger to hide the suit. After all they had tent and camping gear that the suit could have easily been rolled up into and no one would have been the wiser. Hmmmm this deserves a thread of its own.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Night Walker

Kit, the documentary Forbidden Lie$ may be of interest to you:

Part 1 of 10:

Watch all 10 when you have the time. It provides a fascinating case study of a con-artist.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SweatyYeti

parnassus wrote:

There are no measurements of PattyBob.

Not a single one.

You don't have one, SY doesn't have one, Bill Munns, no one has one. sooner or later SY and the others are going to have to come to grips with that fact.

You're right, parn....there are no measurements of 'PattyBob'....because there is no 'PattyBob'.

Not a single one.

You don't have one, except for in your..... imagination2.jpg

Sooner or later you and kitakaze are going to have to come to grips with that fact... Horsey1.jpg

Edited by SweatyYeti

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest HucksterFoot

While not video, I think Bob's interview on Tom Biscardi's Bigfoot Live show in 2007 will be of great use. Bob Heironimus faces Bigfooters MK Davis and Pat Holbrook to defend his claims as well as answer the questions of irate Bigfooters. Thanks to Hucksterfoot for putting it up (Huck, where's part 5?)...

I wish rather than the repeated "no comment" refusals, Gimlin would show the same kind of willingness demonstrated by Heironimus to directly face his skeptics and answer hard questions rather than the sickly-sweet softball he gets from people like Battson and other fan interviews.

Part 5 below. :]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...