Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Drew

Todd Standing Hoaxing? Is Blinky Todd Standing? - New Pics/dna Results

Recommended Posts

Drew

I have an excellent collaboration with Jeff and he and I have not discussed his other lines of investigation, so I simply trust that Jeff is responsible in what else he investigates and whom he also collaborates with, and I consider that in any situation, there may be things going on behind the scene or not readily disclosed which would change the whole context of the situation.

 

So frankly, I'm steering a wide course around this topic and will let it take its course, see where it goes. I won't judge it with only partial knowledge of the situation.

 

Bill

 

Right- I was just looking for your opinion on the mask/head eye movement only.  I understand your collaboration with Dr. Meldrum and was simply looking for an opinion from someone who has done Animatronics before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bigtex

Has TS ever given the type(s) of cameras used, lens, and distance? Nothing to hide there, and could explain a lot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Doc Holliday

Nothing Standing has presented looks living. It is funny how he can get such a close, high resolution facial pic, and still unabIe to prove anything.  I just can't believe that Dr. Meldrum is teaming up with this guy.

this ^, plus 1 wvf.

 

TS rep precedes him.

while i commend bill for taking the high road on this discussion,  the meldrum association with standing is interesting to say the least.... i can't see the good Dr. gaining any credibilty from this blinking situation.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

@Sweaty Yeti: that is a great high-res version. Where did you get it? Also, FWIW, great job on the hair. The mouth is not the correct proportion tho. According to countless sightings, their mouths on unusually wide.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SweatyYeti

^

 

The website that I got it from is linked-to at the bottom of my post. :)

 

One 'red flag' I see with that image, is how the subject's face became completely unobstructed by any branches...and yet still shows no movement, whatsoever....(except for that mechanical-looking eye blink).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bigtex

IMO.......BF's won't look alike unless they are twins, so features will vary. Still on the fence with Standing, and I haven't done enough research on the subject to make a call, it's either real or a very good puppet(s) obviously, but If fake and with so much care/detail involved, I would expect there to be a puppeteer lurking around, unknown & hidden to all except Standing.

 

There is obviously a hair gene that can switch on or off quickly, without the process of evolution, and has been seen throughout human history.

 

If I was gonna hoax a Bigfoot, why not get one of these guys to help you? I've often thought how cool it would be to know one of these individuals with the gene turned 'ON', and get them involved in some field studies. What would a Bigfoot think, they would surely be very curious.

post-193-0-06887300-1396979964.jpg

post-193-0-54486600-1396979973.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
salubrious
Moderator

the "Squatch" remains frozen...

 

SylviaAG3_zps446b1d4a.gif

 

Normally you're supposed to not repost images and here I am doing it. But I am doing it for a reason. Take a look at that stick in front of its mouth in both photos. Its the same stick- but in one photo the camera is closer to the stick, so it looks larger. So the prop has been moved to nearly the same position- but not quite, same for the camera. Yet the angle is the same, the distance to the lens seems the same, everything lines up etc. What are the chances of that in real life??

 

IMO this is incontrovertibly fake, make no mistake and no way around it.

  • Upvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wheellug

the big picture, fuzzy background etc is more the right.. the small inset picture to the left slightly. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

Welcome to Bigfoot's first photo shoot!

Say "Cheese" Bigfoot! Wait, move a little to the left, now closer......closer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SweatyYeti

In those two frames...notice how the shadow on/below the subject's right eye changes.

 

It seems strange to me, how the shading on it's face could change to that extent...while the subject's head, and face appear to change so little. 

Edited by SweatyYeti

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
salubrious
Moderator

Not shot at the same time of day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Crowlogic

Interesting.  Easy to make a still life model and then give it some harmless motion somewhere.  At least it looks better than Blevins.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AaronD
Moderator

IMO.......BF's won't look alike unless they are twins, so features will vary. Still on the fence with Standing, and I haven't done enough research on the subject to make a call, it's either real or a very good puppet(s) obviously, but If fake and with so much care/detail involved, I would expect there to be a puppeteer lurking around, unknown & hidden to all except Standing.

 

There is obviously a hair gene that can switch on or off quickly, without the process of evolution, and has been seen throughout human history.

 

If I was gonna hoax a Bigfoot, why not get one of these guys to help you? I've often thought how cool it would be to know one of these individuals with the gene turned 'ON', and get them involved in some field studies. What would a Bigfoot think, they would surely be very curious.

 

You might put them at risk of danger---I see what a cat does to the newbie in the house ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SweatyYeti

Not shot at the same time of day.

 

barncat wrote:

 

More likely one shot in full sun, the other when a cloud was passing overhead.

 

 

I think that salubrious' explanation would be the more likely one, barncat....because a shadow caused by a passing cloud would probably cover most, or all, of the subject's face.

 

The very small shaded-area looks more like it was due to a change in the 'angle of lighting'. 

 

But the problem with that is....how long would a real, live Sasquatch just stand there....(imitating a Squatch-aquin)....while Todd was right in front of it, at close range...moving around, and recording it??? 

 

 

This video of Todd's is nothing but a joke. It's obviously not a video of a real, live Beast in the wild. :)

Edited by SweatyYeti

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×