Rockape Posted June 6, 2015 Share Posted June 6, 2015 ^That sounds like dis-information to me. We'll have to run you through the database to see which department you work for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Bonehead74 Posted June 6, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted June 6, 2015 Being mindful of what is being said online is crucial and embracing about some of the more shadowy parts of the topic as suggested here are difficult to reconcile for some . Whaaa...??? It's sentences like this one (and they are quite common in your posts) that make it very difficult for me to take you seriously, Gumshoeye. I truly hope you managed a bit more refinement and coherence when writing your reports as a detective. When I mentioned how the chronological order of events evolving from Garrett story and suddenly to SC reminded me of military psi-ops where do you think these men and women go when they leave the military? Do you mean "psyops", perchance? For someone who tries to speak authoritatively on the subject, I'd expect you to at least spell it correctly. These common lapses in the mechanics of your communications do not instill much confidence in their content. You know, attention to detail and all that... 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockape Posted June 6, 2015 Share Posted June 6, 2015 ^^ You're lucky I like your Quint avatar. I'm placing your file in our "ate by a shark" folder. You'll be receiving no more 1111111111 calls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWWASAS Posted June 6, 2015 BFF Patron Share Posted June 6, 2015 (edited) ^That sounds like dis-information to me. We'll have to run you through the database to see which department you work for. Sorry not free to divulge past associations outside of my military service. As things go, officially I was never in Area 51. Unofficially I was but did not see anything but desert. Certainly no BF with any sense would hang around that patch of desert. Let you decide if I am kidding or not and if so, what about. Edited June 6, 2015 by SWWASASQUATCHPROJECT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockape Posted June 6, 2015 Share Posted June 6, 2015 ^ We already know what you know and what you know is a known, known, so you're ok, ya' know. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Divergent1 Posted June 7, 2015 Share Posted June 7, 2015 I wish I could have given that more plus's Bonehead. Obviously I'm not the only member here afflicted with some form of dementia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonehead74 Posted June 7, 2015 Share Posted June 7, 2015 (edited) ^ We already know what you know and what you know is a known, known, so you're ok, ya' know. I knew that. Obviously I'm not the only member here afflicted with some form of dementia. That's what's wrong with me? Suddenly it's all becoming clear... Edited June 7, 2015 by Bonehead74 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Divergent1 Posted June 7, 2015 Share Posted June 7, 2015 You are so kind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 7, 2015 Share Posted June 7, 2015 Say JG, do you suppose drones are used to 'gps tag' boogers? Do you mean track after putting some sort of collar on one? I guess that would work. But, their flight time is so short. Unless you mean real drones, like Predator types. As you would guess, I don't believe the G is involved, so that limits drones to the little ones. I see the best use of a drone as being used at night with FLIR capabilities. It would be cool to say, hear a wood knock, and send a drone to investigate. Those woods are too thick for visual observation from the air, but FLIR at night may work. Heck, those woods are almost too thick to see a Sasquatch standing next to the trail Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest diana swampbooger Posted June 7, 2015 Share Posted June 7, 2015 Do you mean track after putting some sort of collar on one? I guess that would work. But, their flight time is so short. Unless you mean real drones, like Predator types. As you would guess, I don't believe the G is involved, so that limits drones to the little ones. I see the best use of a drone as being used at night with FLIR capabilities. It would be cool to say, hear a wood knock, and send a drone to investigate. Those woods are too thick for visual observation from the air, but FLIR at night may work. Heck, those woods are almost too thick to see a Sasquatch standing next to the trail Think larger, JG. For instance, drones that are available to the open market, like us, are small potatoes, out dated. Drone technologies are way beyond that. Not thinking collars, thinking of a small tag/s shot into a booger. It's only necessary to have a momentary line-of-sight to 'target' a subject. It's no longer necessary to have line-of-sight to 'tag' the subject. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 7, 2015 Share Posted June 7, 2015 Fascinating concept. Way out of my knowledge base. I still think those thick woods would preclude anything aerial from getting close. Also, I don't know of GPS units being that small. Usually the problem with things is battery size. Again, I really don't know what's out there as far as technology goes. I honestly don't believe any organization is tracking Sasquatch, other than compiling reports. But, that's just me. It just seems the last time REAL money was spent on the endeavor, it came out of Tom Slick's pocket. Squatchers need another sugar daddy now that technology has improved! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWWASAS Posted June 7, 2015 BFF Patron Share Posted June 7, 2015 (edited) ^ We already know what you know and what you know is a known, known, so you're ok, ya' know. Actually there was very little incorrect in my statement so if what I know is a known known I am in trouble. Then again I am told that BF likes the tunnels under Edwards Air Force Base, so it that is true, I could be wrong about Area 51. Been to Edwards several times. That is a known known. Tiny GPS tags inserted into humans is movie technology where as chips in dogs is real technology. As anyone knows who does GPS work in dense forests, trees pretty much block GPS signals. The difference being that GPS stuff requires batteries and that means collars large enough to contain a battery that lasts for a while. Dog chips are unpowered. I suppose that subcutaneous GPS chips might be possible, but the battery requirement, and skin attenuation of the signal would be seriously limiting. I had a Dish Network antenna not work because it had moisture trapped in the collector. It has a yard wide antenna, and the fog on the mirror moisture in the collector, was enough to block the signal. So human tissue would do a real job on GPS signals. Edited June 7, 2015 by SWWASASQUATCHPROJECT 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lake County Bigfooot Posted June 8, 2015 Share Posted June 8, 2015 (edited) The technology to track humans is easily down the road, as is a cashless society, simply we will all be a number. The microchip inserted beneath the skin in several places on the body. It is an inevitable end to what we have created, or perhaps we will all be deciphered by our print or facial recognition. The use of such technology for creating a more efficient means of commerce is leading us into an age of government control over our resources. Not that they do not already control them, but that is going to be a fact in this new age, as will the move toward total secularization, and the removal of those who disagree. Where does Bigfoot fit into a new world order, perhaps it will not be of any significance, or some will choose to abandon society and head for the hills, hills shared by this creature. The move toward living off the grid will be epidemic and many will return to a subsistence way of existence, and that is already happening to a smaller degree. Could this lead us back to our native ways, and maybe even into a place of understanding this creature, it might be a backdoor manner of our rediscovery of nature and it's inhabitants. Edited June 8, 2015 by Lake County Bigfooot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWWASAS Posted June 8, 2015 BFF Patron Share Posted June 8, 2015 (edited) The chips animals have are similar to grocery store security tags. Need to have a reader close by. I was talking with a clerk in our local grocery store about security, and she told me that Fred Meyers has a system that identifies a person and tracks them through the store, watching what you look at but don't buy, what you buy, and it builds a file on you as you shop. Then when you check out, it matches the file with your rewards card identity, and they basically know what you have done, looked at, and are interested in when you shop. Then amazingly enough when you are rung up and check out, it prints out discount coupons' of stuff you looked at or normally buy for you to use your next store trip. Credit card companies sell purchasing information, Amazon has a file on everyone that shops, and the list goes on and on. If we ever get chips like dogs we were be tracked everywhere in civilization. The only place we will be safe and private is in the woods with our big furry friends. Edited June 8, 2015 by SWWASASQUATCHPROJECT 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ChasingRabbits Posted June 8, 2015 Share Posted June 8, 2015 Quite frankly if someone showed up to me, claimed he was with some federal agency but did not show ID, I would be more inclined to think it was some BF researcher trying to find out what I know or where I go. For the most part some of the lazy ones seem to be more inclined to get involved in deception of various kinds, be it puppets or stuffed things in freezers, so why not pretending to be federal agents? Ditto. I follow general safety rules: they need to show ID and I need to be able to get that ID confirmed if I like. From time to time, we've had fake cops pull women drivers and assault them. So, I need whoever it is to show me ID. Also impersonating a Federal Officer has a fine and/or 3 years jail time according to US Code:https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/912Not that this would deter some people from doing it, I think it would deter most people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts