Jump to content
TD-40

Patty The Conehead

Recommended Posts

SweatyYeti

roguefooter wrote:

 

 

Why would a hairless mask be the same size as a head full of hair? Do you not realize that the mask outline will be larger once it's fully haired?

 

 

More importantly, Rogue....there is no information on the size/scale of the subject's body...relative to the size of the 'costume head'.

 

Therefore, the graphic is meaningless. 

Edited by SweatyYeti

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kitakaze

Why would a hairless mask be the same size as a head full of hair? Whoever made this comparison apparently didn't take into consideration that adding hair will make the outline larger.

The head has internal padding and is worn by a average built man just over six feet tall. A head full of hair. We both know that Patty's hair is extremely short all over the body including the head...

101.jpg

The recreation of Patty's head is an excellent demonstration that a human head can fit in Patty's.

Reaction to that recreation by PGF believers is similarly an excellent demonstration of the absolute determination by them not to accept anything that could in any way indicate Patty is not the creature they desperately need to believe in.

Rogue, of the two hairless masks recreating Patty's head shown in that comparison, which in your opinion is the better mask and more accurate to the PGF?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

A human head cannot fit inside Patty's. That human would have to has his/her forehead sliced off. To make a 'mask' with such a sharply sloping cranium in order for the human head to fit inside it would need to be enlarged, as ape head in movies are. It would then look much bigger than it is. As ape heads in movies are.


roguefooter wrote:

 

 

More importantly, Rogue....there is no information on the size/scale of the subject's body...relative to the size of the 'costume head'.

 

Therefore, the graphic is meaningless. 

 

Absolutely it is. Meaningless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SweatyYeti

kitakaze wrote:

 

 

Reaction to that recreation by PGF believers is similarly an excellent demonstration of the absolute determination by them not to accept anything that could in any way indicate Patty is not the creature they desperately need to believe in.

 

 

Actually, kit....you show more determination in withholding key information from your "three principals"...(as to who "wore the suit" and who "made the suit")....than anyone else here is "determined to run/hide from the truth".

 

Maybe you should re-think your garbage proposal....and tell us who those two people were.

 

We are happily waiting...determined to discover what your version of "the truth" is... :popcorn:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
roguefooter

The head has internal padding and is worn by a average built man just over six feet tall. A head full of hair. We both know that Patty's hair is extremely short all over the body including the head...

 

 

Patty's hair was described as being "2-4 inches long". Sorry but any hair adds volume, and 2-4 inches will definitely add volume. Once that mask is haired it will no longer fit that outline. Just take a look at that giant brow on the mask- what's that going to look like once it has hair covering it?

 

Whoever sculpted that mask went by the shape of Patty's head without the bulk added by the hair. If they were a real mask maker they would have failed their job.

 

Rogue, of the two hairless masks recreating Patty's head shown in that comparison, which in your opinion is the better mask and more accurate to the PGF?  

 

        

 

Put hair on them then I'll tell you. A bald head will always look smaller than one full of hair.

Edited by roguefooter
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kitakaze

I've seen the mask with hair and it looks the same. What Patty is described to have had is unnecessary, I can do as Munns says and stick to the film. The hair is visibly extremely short and nowhere near four inches. 

 

The head matches Patty's perfectly and nothing like Bill's intentional fail.

 

Yet it shall not pass. Whatever hand wave you have to get it away from you is sociology to me and nothing more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

^

It's an epic fail Kitakaze.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
roguefooter

I've seen the mask with hair and it looks the same. What Patty is described to have had is unnecessary, I can do as Munns says and stick to the film. The hair is visibly extremely short and nowhere near four inches. 

 

The head matches Patty's perfectly and nothing like Bill's intentional fail.

 

Yet it shall not pass. Whatever hand wave you have to get it away from you is sociology to me and nothing more.

 

If you think we should just take your word for it again then don't even bother. Post pictures of the haired mask being worn so we can see for our self if it looks the same.

 

If the hair was "extremely short" on Patty's head then why can't we see the ears? Sorry, but what you see is only your interpretation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kitakaze

Excellent. What specifically is an epic failure of the following recreation of Patty's head in the lower right?

Bigaaron2.jpg

Similarly, what, if anything, is successful about the following?...

Bighead1.jpg

 

If the hair was "extremely short" on Patty's head then why can't we see the ears? Sorry, but what you see is only your interpretation.

So awesome. Maybe it's a bowl cut and the hair at the armpit crease and breasts and under the nose is fresh sheered.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SweatyYeti

Excellent. What specifically is an epic failure of the following recreation of Patty's head in the lower right?

 

 

 

Specifically....the following...

 

Here is an overlay of Bob H., scaled to fit just within the 'suit head'...

 

 

kitzo%20SuitheadBobH-AG2_zps62zhryp0.gif

 

 

Here is one of the animation frames...

 

kitzo%20SuitheadBobH-AG1%20Frame4_zps3zc

 

 

Now...overlaying an image of Patty, scaled to match the 'head size'......note the difference in the upper-arm lengths...

 

 

kitzo%20SuitheadBobHPatty-AG1_zpshxfyuuj

 

 

 

Here are the two images of Bob and Patty side-by-side...

 

 

kitzo%20SuitheadBobHPatty-SBS2_zpshwlstm

 

 

 

I think there's something wrong with your analysis, kit. :)

Edited by SweatyYeti
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sunflower

Sweaty,

 

Good analysis and that pic really is a great piece of proof.  Patty's arms are so much longer from the shoulder to the wrist.  The human skeleton cannot come close to what Patty's measurements are and the way she walks.  

 

Bravo!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
roguefooter

So awesome. Maybe it's a bowl cut and the hair at the armpit crease and breasts and under the nose is fresh sheered.

 

See Kit, a real creature grows hair at different lengths on different parts of the body. You're assuming that the hair should be of a consistent length over the whole body like on a suit. That does more damage to your argument than good.

 

BTW Still waiting for those haired mask pictures you claimed to have seen.

Edited by roguefooter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SweatyYeti

Sweaty,

 

Good analysis and that pic really is a great piece of proof.  Patty's arms are so much longer from the shoulder to the wrist.  The human skeleton cannot come close to what Patty's measurements are and the way she walks.  

 

Bravo!

 

 

Thanks, Sunflower. :)

 

The difference in the lengths of their upper-arms is easily noticeable. Notice how Patty's elbow reaches slightly lower along the body than Bob's....while her arm is swung forward by about 35-degrees...and Bob's arm is hanging straight down/vertical. 

 

That must have been a magical suit, that Roger made... :bow:

Edited by SweatyYeti

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kitakaze

 

 

 

Here are the two images of Bob and Patty side-by-side...

 

 

kitzo%20SuitheadBobHPatty-SBS2_zpshwlstm

 

 

 

I think there's something wrong with your analysis, kit. :)

 

Thank you for showing Bob's head fits comfortably in Patty's, the same as the average human head wearing the Patty recreation, regardless of the T-rex forearm illusion frame.

 

Patty's head and arms are not inhuman in proportion.

 

 

 

Bigsweats24.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

Patties forearms look quite a bit longer to me in the above pic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...