Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Admin

Thoughts About Munns' Book - " When Roger Met Patty " (2)

Recommended Posts

salubrious
Moderator

Well, covered in fur and sticking straight out from the lower chest. They'd be more plausible as air sacs than mammary glands.

Seems to me we've had this conversation before.... how can anyone know how they are "supposed" to look? How is it that you are the expert on this???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OntarioSquatch

Such a small difference would be normal. Regular modern humans for example have large pendulous breasts, which are different from anything seen in other ape species, but that difference doesn't mean we're not real; it just means that we're the first example of it.  

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bigfoothunter

It's beyond silly for Kitakaze to even try to discuss Patty's breast as he has no history of examining them, nor any proof that he is an authority on them. He should first actually read up on the various differences in size - shape - and elasticity found among womens breast.

 

http://www.007b.com/breast_gallery.php

 

http://susansingerart.blogspot.ca/2010/06/different-sizes-and-shapes-of-breasts.html

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breast

 

As usual - I found no helpful information in the post Kitakaze made as he merely makes a statement that he can attribute to his experience as a way of having a back door to run through. But it took only seconds to do some checking to know far more than he obviously does about breast.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PBeaton

"The breasts look like a 60's cowboy's conception of Bigfoot breasts, not like any actual functioning breasts."

 

You'll have to forgive me when it comes to relyin on what kitakaze claims to see.

post-279-0-73891200-1435626589.jpg

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Backdoc

^^^

Pat,

It's like I had a pounding headache and here you arrived with the perfect medicine providing full relief.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DWA

Seems to me we've had this conversation before.... how can anyone know how they are "supposed" to look? How is it that you are the expert on this???

All the evidence from all these sightings and all these footprint finds tells us what sasquatch and their footprints look like.  But of course all that's a crock.

 

But breasts?  Kit, our World Expert, knows *just* what they're supposed to look like ...from...right up here in his ol' noodle!  Oh, OK.

Edited by DWA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JustCurious

I agree with salubrious,

we have had this conversation before,

multiple times.

 

In fact, my response remains the same: http://bigfootforums.com/index.php/topic/50665-thoughts-about-munns-book-when-roger-met-patty-2/page-6#entry897220

 

And I still see the same things as I saw here: http://bigfootforums.com/index.php/topic/39892-pgf-frames-sharpened-with-blurity-software/page-5#entry893215

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PBeaton

Backdoc,

 

He really does most of the work himself(the foot comparison)... :swoon:

 

Pat...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...