Jump to content
gigantor

The Best, Most Plausible, Detailed Bigfoot Reports (by SSR Score)

Recommended Posts

gigantor

Everyone likes a good Bigfoot story. It just so happens that the BFF SSR project scores each sighting and the best reports score the highest.

 

In this thread, we will post the best, most plausible and detailed Bigfoot reports based on the SSR score. Not all at once of course, but a few each week.

 

Enjoy!

--------------

This report scores an 8 (out of 10). It's from the State of Washington in 2003. BFRO Report 22475:

 

http://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=22475

 

-------------

The following is an account by Bart Cutino of the BFRO with Cliff Barrackman. It scores a 9 and it happened in the State of Washington. BFRO report 26065:

 

http://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=26065

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MikeZimmer
1 hour ago, gigantor said:

Everyone likes a good Bigfoot story. It just so happens that the BFF SSR project scores each sighting and the best reports score the highest.

 

In this thread, we will post the best, most plausible and detailed Bigfoot reports based on the SSR score. Not all at once of course, but a few each week.

 

Enjoy!

--------------

This report scores an 8 (out of 10). It's from the State of Washington in 2003. BFRO Report 22475:

 

http://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=22475

 

-------------

The following is an account by Bart Cutino of the BFRO with Cliff Barrackman. It scores a 9 and it happened in the State of Washington. BFRO report 26065:

 

http://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=26065

 

 

 

Bart Cutino was a member of the old forum, going by the moniker Bart Loves Jays or some such thing. He was a fan of the Toronto Blue Jays. I always pegged him as a pretty sensible fellow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SWWASAS

Yes.     Talk about BF while working for a logging company and you might as well start looking for another job.  If the loggers would talk, researchers would not have to spend so much time looking for active areas.    The loggers know where they are.  

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
NCBFr
BFF Donor

The road to BF is not built on a single piece of evidence.  It is built by thousands of bricks similar to this.  Sure you may knock one or two out of the house, but the structure will still stand.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OkieFoot
BFF Donor
On 2/14/2019 at 5:47 PM, gigantor said:

Here is a report with a score of 10!

 

http://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=28230

 

 

28230b.jpeg

 

gigantor, I'm late with this but thanks for posting this report. I can agree with a score of 10; this was an excellent report. I can't think of another one I've read where the witness actually watched the creature make a vocalization; in this case a "scream/holler."  The witness was also observant of details.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
NatFoot
BFF Donor
9 hours ago, gigantor said:

A great report from Ohio with evidence, it has a score of 8. BFRO Report 33979.

 

bfro-33979.jpg

 

That is a great one! Not sure I'd want them visiting that often. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OkieFoot
BFF Donor

I agree; this was a great report. It was like reading a novel; the details got better and better as you kept reading. Getting hit in the back of the head with a flying stick was a very interesting detail, along with the stacking of the deer legs.

gigantor, thanks for posting this.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Patterson-Gimlin

Thanks for sharing. It is a nice read. 

However, he says there are no bears in the area and the investigator contradicts that .

 

Foot prints look good  ,but broken fences and maimed deer could be bears. As well as the growls. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
gigantor
22 hours ago, Patterson-Gimlin said:

,but broken fences and maimed deer could be bears. As well as the growls. 

 

But not the broken lower jaw and the neatly stacked leg bones...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Patterson-Gimlin

And you know this with 100 % certainty. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
gigantor
57 minutes ago, Patterson-Gimlin said:

And you know this with 100 % certainty. 

 

No.

 

BTW, how long does it take you to walk 16.6 feet?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Patterson-Gimlin

Less than six seconds. 

35 inch stride according to my girlfriend 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×