JustCurious 154 Posted October 5, 2018 I've been doing more checking on this one. The fur pattern in the 'non-foot' picture is consistent with what a bear's fur looks like. The shape of the foot is consistent with a bear. Bears are known to mess with trail cams, so behavior is consistent with a bear. What is NOT consistent with a bear is that there doesn't appear to be any fur between the ball of the foot and the toes as would be expected in a bear and we don't see any claws. I'm thinking it's possible this is a young bear cub. Aside from something 'mythological', that's the only possiblity in my opinion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Huntster 2,989 Posted October 5, 2018 On 9/28/2018 at 8:41 PM, Huntster said: .......there are no claws visible at all, and cub claws on black bears are quite large for the size of their feet.......... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
VAfooter 384 Moderator Posted October 5, 2018 Just something that stuck out to me.... I noticed that the temp at the time was 55 degrees. That seemed a little cool for an OK night in the middle of summer. Checking the weather for the area it shows that the lows for that time period was in mid 60's. The local temp shown in the cam footage was a good 8-10 degrees cooler, so I wonder if it was up in the mountains a bit? Henryetta proper is at low elevation (less than 700 feet). Like I said, just something that seemed odd... 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCBFr 202 Posted October 5, 2018 (edited) In case you were not aware, the guy that posted this on Reddit is not the owner of the picture and does not have the original with all of the metadata. He said he would try and get it but alas nothing new posted in Reddit from him on this subject in a week. I think you need the original to see if there are claws which really will determine a lot about the picture. Edited October 5, 2018 by NCBFr 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
spacemonkeymafia 30 Posted October 9, 2018 On 10/5/2018 at 6:47 PM, VAfooter said: Just something that stuck out to me.... I noticed that the temp at the time was 55 degrees. That seemed a little cool for an OK night in the middle of summer. Checking the weather for the area it shows that the lows for that time period was in mid 60's. The local temp shown in the cam footage was a good 8-10 degrees cooler, so I wonder if it was up in the mountains a bit? Henryetta proper is at low elevation (less than 700 feet). Like I said, just something that seemed odd... I live in Chattanooga city limits. When I go to my parents house to visit 20 miles away in the country it's usually 10 degrees cooler. Most cities record the official temperature at the airport, at least Chattown does. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WSA 1,071 Posted October 12, 2018 So what I take away from the straight-faced assertions that this photo could maybe be, totally, of a skunk's or bear's foot is: Don't be so closed minded that that your brain dies from a lack of oxygen. We will probably never know what this is, exactly, but we already know, or should know, what it most definitely isn't. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Twist 788 Posted October 12, 2018 ^ it’s most definitely not a horse!!!! Lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Whistler 58 Posted October 12, 2018 ^ it’s most definitely not mine!!! : ) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OKBFFan 135 Posted October 14, 2018 Has anyone sent these to dr. Meldrum? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCBFr 202 Posted October 18, 2018 I did. Shockingly no response. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Whistler 58 Posted October 18, 2018 Give it time- I’m sure he’s being pulled in multiple directions, but I do think this holds a lot a value.. even though it’s not the clearest picture... Cheers! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
adam2323 122 Posted January 8 Well my observations it’s definitely not a bear or any mammal foot I’ve seen. And secondly it’s really impossible to give any accurate size. Just not enough here to say one way or the other Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RedHawk454 18 Posted January 15 Its a human foot, maybe a wide human foot toes are too close to be a Sasquatch theres some photos even here on bigfootforums that are from movies. people were debating if they were real and didn't know it was from a movie. If It was a movie called letters from the big man. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
