Jump to content

Interesting New Trail Cam Photo..


Recommended Posts

JustCurious

I've been doing more checking on this one.  The fur pattern in the 'non-foot' picture is consistent with what a bear's fur looks like.  The shape of the foot is consistent with a bear.  Bears are known to mess with trail cams, so behavior is consistent with a bear.  What is NOT consistent with a bear is that there doesn't appear to be any fur between the ball of the foot and the toes as would be expected in a bear and we don't see any claws.

 

I'm thinking it's possible this is a young bear cub.  Aside from something 'mythological', that's the only possiblity in my opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Huntster
On 9/28/2018 at 8:41 PM, Huntster said:

.......there are no claws visible at all, and cub claws on black bears are quite large for the size of their feet..........

 

 

83AF49DF-755B-47DB-879B-9B47FC05E522.jpeg

2BD89EF2-8E64-4207-8182-CA4F88101A4A.jpeg

485D0082-1D79-4F8D-839E-DFDD0FCB8978.jpeg

4DE26B82-E198-4BB2-AD6B-2FED395BEF19.jpeg

Link to post
Share on other sites
VAfooter
Admin

Just something that stuck out to me....

 

I noticed that the temp at the time was 55 degrees. That seemed a little cool for an OK night in the middle of summer. Checking the weather for the area it shows that the lows for that time period was in mid 60's. The local temp shown in the cam footage was a good 8-10 degrees cooler, so I wonder if it was up in the mountains a bit? Henryetta proper is at low elevation (less than 700 feet).

 

Like I said, just something that seemed odd...

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

In case you were not aware, the guy that posted this on Reddit is not the owner of the picture and does not have the original with all of the metadata.  He said he would try and get it but alas nothing new posted in Reddit from him on this subject in a week.  I think you need the original to see if there are claws which really will determine a lot about the picture.

Edited by NCBFr
  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
spacemonkeymafia
On 10/5/2018 at 6:47 PM, VAfooter said:

Just something that stuck out to me....

 

I noticed that the temp at the time was 55 degrees. That seemed a little cool for an OK night in the middle of summer. Checking the weather for the area it shows that the lows for that time period was in mid 60's. The local temp shown in the cam footage was a good 8-10 degrees cooler, so I wonder if it was up in the mountains a bit? Henryetta proper is at low elevation (less than 700 feet).

 

Like I said, just something that seemed odd...

I live in Chattanooga city limits. When I go to my parents house to visit 20 miles away in the country it's usually 10 degrees cooler. Most cities record the official temperature at the airport, at least Chattown does.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what I take away from the straight-faced assertions that this photo could maybe be, totally, of a skunk's or bear's foot is: Don't be so closed minded that that your brain dies from a lack of oxygen. We will probably never know what this is, exactly, but we already know, or should know, what it most definitely isn't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Give it time- I’m sure he’s being pulled in multiple directions, but I do think this holds a lot a value.. even though it’s not the clearest picture...

 

Cheers!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • gigantor unfeatured this topic
  • 2 months later...
adam2323

Well my observations it’s definitely not a bear or any mammal foot I’ve seen. And secondly it’s really impossible to give any accurate size. Just not enough here to say one way or the other

Link to post
Share on other sites
RedHawk454

Its a human foot, maybe a wide human foot

 

toes are too close to be a Sasquatch

 

theres some photos even here on bigfootforums that are from movies.  people were debating if they were real and didn't know it was from a movie.  If It was a movie called letters from the big man. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 year later...

Just came across this post and am very intrigued. If that foot is connected to a living non-human, then I am leaning toward a young juvenile pushing his boundaries. Supposedly Sasquatch and other animals can sense infra red, so it is possible a small one became aware of the trail cam by his senses or was made aware of it by an older, wiser one and just decided he didn't like it. It does not look human at all, even without taking the visible hair into account.  Like others have pointed out, the toes are too uniform, the calf and shin connect to the foot in a more central position opposed to closer to the heel like a human's. I haven't seen enough mid-tarsal breaks to really know what to look for, and the high step with the foot aligned completely vertical as is indicative of Patty's stride is all very interesting. If it is a hoax, it is someone with more than an average understanding of great apes and how a Sasquatch is believed to be built structurally.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
×
×
  • Create New...