Jump to content
Guest Kerchak

Is It Really Almost Identical To The William Roe Encounter?

Recommended Posts

Guest BCCryptid

The comparison was also about the whole encounter not just the look of the creature. Read what Kitakaze was saying elsewhere in other threads. Sorry but I'm too lazy to bother to link to it right now hehe.

Sorry but I see NO comparison other than the sketch, which gives us a very sexy female sasquatch with some major ta-tas to copy, should you so be inclined, and also be a suit master on par with John Chambers of course.

Going through all the forums to see what kit has said? Can I pour acid in my eyes instead?

As for the 'way' Bob described the object as closely matching what Roe said, another explanation might be, uh, they were describing the same REAL animal? I know I'm always amazed when people in Russia describe a grizzly EXACTLY the same way as people in Alaska. UNCANNY!!! :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest nycBig

I think it was the Kunsler drawing that was implied Roger had been influenced by, not the one above.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest BCCryptid

I think it was the Kunsler drawing that was implied Roger had been influenced by, not the one above.

Can someone post the Kunsler drawing? Because I think the Roe sketch is a perfect match for Patty, being two accurate represenations of a female adult sasquatch, and all.

I think the ROE beauty is a squatch porn star though. Patty's are much more droopy! If Patty ever met the Roe babe, she'd say, 'FAKE, Bitch!' :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

It's my understanding all sasquatch are female and therefore you will always have some similarity between sightings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest nycBig

I think the ROE beauty is a squatch porn star though. Patty's are much more droopy! If Patty ever met the Roe babe, she'd say, 'FAKE, Bitch!' :D

wow, so you like hairy cankles on your women do ya? :D

ETA: biatch!!

Edited by nycBig

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

careful guys, Roe described her as a "young" female. She's (whisper) underage.

:blink:

dav

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Kerchak

I'll just keep have to keep in mind that you don't care about context and that cherry picking quotes is just your style.

The context is that some scoftics think the Roe encounter and the Patterson Gimlin encounter are very very similar, almost carbon copy. Kitakaze is a person who has claimed that. The quote was entirely in context with the claim. Here is the quote again:

""""He describes it near verbatim as Roe and he places it in a setup just like Roe's story.""""

Do explain how that is NOT in the context of accusations comparing the Roe encounter to the Patterson Gimlin encounter?

Patterson being accused of describing it near verbatim to Roe and Patterson being accused of placing it in a set up just like the Roe story is "out of context"? :blink::o

Where did you go to school to learn English?

Edited by Kerchak

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Blackdog
Where did you go to school to learn English?

(Kershak's quote before he edited it)

No se habla babble.

Guess that answers that doesn't it smart guy?

When you learn to talk to adults I just might start answering you like one.

Edited by Blackdog

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Kerchak

^

^

^

It's clear to me you are not even attempting to act like an adult but are rather here to play silly games and ruin this thread. My granny warned me about people like you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Blackdog

No Kershak, you started a thread based on an out of context quote and it's clear you did it just to bash a member here without basis.

I remember that from junior high, let me know when you get there, OK?

Edited by Blackdog
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hairy Man

It's not out of context Blackdog, I'm not sure where your beef is. I'm kind of scratching my head on why you are making it an issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Kerchak

No Kershak, you started a thread based on an out of context quote

I didn't start this thread based on any one quote.

The quote I found later at your request was entirely in the context of the William Roe v Patterson Gimlin encounter and here it is again:

"""""""He describes it near verbatim as Roe and he places it in a setup just like Roe's story."""""

and it's clear you did it just to bash a member here without basis.

No I started this thread to discuss the disimilarities between the Roe and Pattertson Gimlin encounters.

You did read my opening post didn't you? It was all about the disimilarities between the Roe and Patterson Gimlin encounter and was NOT about bashing any other member here. I didn't even mention any specific members until after YOU asked for a link. Remember?

Thanks for doing your best to try to sabotage my thread.

You clearly don't want to talk about the Roe vs Patterson Gimlin encounters. I'll ask you this once. Can you please stop your little games and lies? You are contributing nothing to the actual thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Kerchak

It's not out of context Blackdog, I'm not sure where your beef is. I'm kind of scratching my head on why you are making it an issue.

Thank you Hairy Man. I have no idea what Black Dog is trying to do. He asked for a link and I gave him a link and a quote where a member here accuses Patterson of placing the set just like Roe's and describing it almost verbatim to Roe's........and he says it's out of context?? :blink: :blink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Blackdog

I read Crows comments and I read kitakaze's and even though kit makes a frikken mess out of his answers I don't think his intent was to say that Patterson was making an exact replication of the Roe account. I think he made that quite clear dispite that goofy quote.

Maybe he makes his statements ambiguous enough to cause confusion, but that's the way I read it. That's my opinion and I'm entitled to it, right or wrong. Isn't that right?

Edited by Blackdog

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hairy Man

No need to thank me...your quote is totally in context. I have no idea why Blackdog is making it an issue. But I am very glad you started the thread because it is a great comparison. Roe and Patterson are not at all similar, and that is a great point to make. Thank you!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...