Jump to content
Guest Kerchak

Is It Really Almost Identical To The William Roe Encounter?

Recommended Posts

SweatyYeti

Yawn...

Figures...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

I knew I'd read a thread around here about this subject seeing as Kitakaze has just brought it up in another thread so rather than messing that thread up why not continue it here?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
roguefooter

There are similarities but only along the lines of seeing the same kind of creature. There are enough differences to note two completely different sightings and not a "verbatim" copy as Kit claims.

 

Many aspects of both descriptions were common with other sightings as well, including the silver tipped hair and specific facial features.

 

It's easy to cherry pick details to create a hoax conspiracy, you just ignore the differences. I could easily claim that Roger wore a plaid shirt and cowboy hat because that's what the gunman in the Roe drawing wears too. Oh yeah there's a rifle too- that must be why P&G had rifles with them..

Edited by roguefooter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PBeaton

Did kitakaze say they were the same again ? ha ! ha ! Anyone ever ask him ta point out the differences, just for fun, should be quite interestin'.  :) 

 

Pat...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bigfoothunter

Both incidents were in the forest - during the day - and under different circumstances. Other than that - both men may have seen a female Sasquatch. Considering there are only males and females of each species - nothing unusual to me that two sightings that happened 22 years apart may have involved a female of the species.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

^

 

Yes. In the forest. In the day. Featuring a hair covered upright creature. Isn't that the same as most sasquatch encounters?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bigfoothunter

Had people of believed that Roger encountered a male, then we'd be hearing the same diatribe in reverse ... and you could bet that  it would be said that Roger took the easy way out by not making his subject a female. And nearly all of those critics have not intelligently addressed the weight issues. Ex-member Kerry tried with his silly suggestions which only in turn made himself sound foolish.

 

 

Edited by Bigfoothunter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

Some people see everything in nothing. Bit like some wishful thinking bigfooters see bigfoot when it's a tree stump. Just re-reading through this thread again its obvious how different the Roe encounter was to Patterson's. They were not the same or verbatim at all. Similar in some aspects? Yes. But similar in some aspects to other bigfoot encounters as well, which of course we would expect to be the case if there are such creatures as sasquatch.I'm really really struggling hard to think why it's so suspicious that descriptions of two female sasquatch (both of which are considered gold standard sasquatch classics) share some common or similar traits. Wouldn't it be odder and more suspicious if they didn't? This actually points towards the authenticity of both encounters. Of course if a person totally dismisses the very notion of bigfoot that's different, but they would dismiss everything and they see suspicion and conspiracy theories everywhere so it's not really helpful or constructive and adds nothing to the debate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Backdoc

 So if we had 2 rare encounters with Wolverines years apart and they generally looked the same, is the second inspired by the first?

 

We are lead to believe the second Bigfoot encounter is using the script from the first encounter (Rowe) years before.

 

If bigfoot is fake it would not matter if the encounters were similar lies separated by time or dissimilar lies separated by time.  It makes sense if bigfoot is real a some things would be similar:

 

1)  Being a rare animal they would be encountered years apart similar to a baseball Perfect Game.  There has been more than one Perfect Game pitched in baseball but darn few in the decades of baseball play played by many teams over hundreds of games a year.

 

2)  Both Female?  Big Deal. There is a 50/50 chance of matching female in each encounter.  Flip a coin and it's tails.  Flip it again and there is a 50% chance of it being tails again.

 

3)  The breast might be the only sign the creature is female are we cannot see a blue or pink bow in its hair.  Thus, if they see the breast they are seeing what obvious characteristic there is to observe. Why does that scream hoax?

 

4)  We would not expect huge major differences if the creature was real.  A major difference from a typical encounter makes that encounter less typical and thus, less likely. 

 

Backdoc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PBeaton

The thought that two animals of the same species would look similar is absurd...isn't it kitakaze ???  ;) 

 

Pat...

post-279-0-78664900-1424741486.jpg

post-279-0-79031800-1424741589.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bigfoothunter

Right , Pat ---- how absurd to think otherwise. That is why Kitakaze is known as the critical thinker and we are not.    :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...