Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Admin

The Actual Developing Of The Pgf (3)

Recommended Posts

Admin

Please continue the discussion here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Squatchy McSquatch

In before 'secret porno lab' nonsense :)

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Backdoc
BFF Donor

^

 

While I personally Don’t buy the idea of a porno lap type development, I applaud  good minds considering many options in attempt to clarify whatever the truth is.

 

I think a Porn lab is very unlikely.  Nothing wrong with considering a lot of possibilities though.

 

You think the Patterson film is a hoax and that’s fine.  Let’s talk Development.

 

Can you tell us where you think the film was developed since it had to be developed somewhere?   You and I would agree with the premise that it was probably developed in a lab that was capable of handling the specialised issues around very specialised film.  

 

What lab do you think developed the film?

 

How much earlier than the October 20 date do you think the filming occurred keeping in mind the full red trees which are visible in the film itself?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Squatchy McSquatch

Within a week or so before Oct  20, probably developed in Palo Altowould be my guess.

 

If the camera original ever turns up      we would have a better idea ;)

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Backdoc
BFF Donor

Question for Skeptics:

 

Would it be possible for the PGF to be a hoax and yet the film (hoax) still shot on Oct 20th 1967 to be viewed that Sunday?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OldMort

^^^ All that we know for certain is that a film was shot and that according to several first hand accounts, was viewed for the first time at Al Deatley's house on October 22. 1967.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Twist
2 hours ago, Backdoc said:

Question for Skeptics:

 

Would it be possible for the PGF to be a hoax and yet the film (hoax) still shot on Oct 20th 1967 to be viewed that Sunday?

 

Id say not likely as it’s the timeline as presented that leads me to believe it may be a hoax.   Not Patty herself.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Squatchy McSquatch
3 hours ago, Backdoc said:

Question for Skeptics:

 

Would it be possible for the PGF to be a hoax and yet the film (hoax) still shot on Oct 20th 1967 to be viewed that Sunday?

 

No.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Squatchy McSquatch

Not if you really think about it...

 

No.

 

It’s all been explained in the two previous threads.

 

Proessing within the timeline given by P/G was not possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Squatchy McSquatch

Or, at the very least has not been verified.

 

A ‘focusing on the film itself’ approach is haphazard imo. 

 

At the end of the day it’s still s bloke in a suit. 

Last thought before the weekend...

 

Can anyone — proponent or otherwise — show proof that the PGF was filmed on Oct 20?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Twist
14 minutes ago, Squatchy McSquatch said:

Or, at the very least has not been verified.

 

A ‘focusing on the film itself’ approach is haphazard imo. 

 

At the end of the day it’s still s bloke in a suit. 

Last thought before the weekend...

 

Can anyone — proponent or otherwise — show proof that the PGF was filmed on Oct 20?

 

Other than the “word” of the folks involved, I don’t believe so!   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Backdoc
BFF Donor

Possible doesn't mean likely, it just means it could be done.  Could doesn't mean it is some 1 in a million chance but some difficult but possible chance such as an onside kick or a hailmary pass in football.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Backdoc
BFF Donor
15 hours ago, Squatchy McSquatch said:

 

A ‘focusing on the film itself’ approach is haphazard imo. 

 

 

 

You are right.  We shouldn't ignore the fact Lyly Loverty and crew didn't see any signs of the PGF encounter or tracks just before the Oct 20th date and then did see it right after the Oct 20th date.  (he is not 100% certain but this is generally true).  This strongly suggests via a powerful witness the filming event likely occurred on Oct 20th as Roger and Bob claimed.

 

Yea, if we ignored important things like that, we might become a hardline skeptics instead of an open- minded believer or skeptic.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Backdoc
BFF Donor

I think it is difficult but possible Roger and Bob could film the PGF on Fri (Be it  real OR a hoax) and  have the film there Sunday for viewing.    In fact, I would say it is even more likely they could pull off the timeline if it was a hoax.  A hoax would be an anticipated event so it's easier to anticipate the pathway needed to accomplish the Sunday development.  This would be harder on-the-fly as each step needed could not be anticipated in advance.  

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Twist

Technically, it could have been filmed, flown and processed in the timeline given.  I have issue with the logistics of it, not that they are impossible but the whole thing from start to finish would of had to go off lickity split clean to happen.  I"m open to them doing so but but believe it unlikely.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×