Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Guest Admin

The Actual Developing Of The Pgf (3)

Recommended Posts

Backdoc
15 hours ago, PBeaton said:

 

I like all three quotes as well.

Quote 1- "..would not risk.."

Quote 2- "..would never.."

Quote 3- "..would never consider.."

 

As I have repeatedly said, Frank Ishihara never says Tall didn't, he speculates that he wouldn't 

 

 

 

Frank seems to make the limiting factor Behavior, or motivation.   Your post does a good job of illustrating that.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Squatchy McSquatch
On 2/27/2019 at 1:16 AM, norseman said:

Oh I thought you said they gluuued the hair on?

 

Bob H claimed he wore a old football helmet under the horse hide.

 

Watch the Prohaska clip. Gluuuued. Is the term he used on account of his accent.

 

BobH said it was like a football helmet. He didn’t say it was a football helmet.

 

The dead red horse hide has been explained and dismissed so many times, it’s sad you need to bring it up :)

Edited by Squatchy McSquatch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
norseman
31 minutes ago, Squatchy McSquatch said:

 

Watch the Prohaska clip. Gluuuued. Is the term he used on account of his accent.

 

BobH said it was like a football helmet. He didn’t say it was a football helmet.

 

The dead red horse hide has been explained and dismissed so many times, it’s sad you need to bring it up :)

 

Ok. So explain your position concerning Prohaska?

 

Obviously as a die hard skeptic you think its some sort of suit.

 

And yanno whats sad? Every hoax theory ever introduced against the PGF. Including Heronimous.....

 

 

 

 

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Squatchy McSquatch

Like I said watch the Prohaska interview.

 

why do you keep bringing up Heironimus? 

 

How do you reckon the PGF got filmed on Friday and viewed the following Sunday?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
norseman

I've watched it a million times....

 

Because if the hair was gluuued on? Its being gluuuued on Heronimous right? Or are you prepared to name someone else?

 

If your going to promote that theory that is?

 

I dont really care. Its more important to refute what you see on the film or not. Than worrying about the details surrounding the film that are over 50 years old.

 

Like Prohaska? I think the idea is preposterous. But he thought that because of the muscles seen moving. And no suit could do that then. Each hair had to be individually glued on. Of course the easier explanation? Is that its not a hoax at all. 

 

Again need a body.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Squatchy McSquatch

Again with Heironimus. 

 

Nobody said anything about glueing anything onto BobH.

 

Why would I be prepared to name someone else?  I’m not aware of anyone else who claimed to be ‘that guy’ and I’m not talking about him, and this isn’t ‘that thread’

 

Again Norse

 

Do you have any idea how the PGF was developed?

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Squatchy McSquatch
32 minutes ago, norseman said:

 

Again need a body.

 

Dream on buddy.

 

1967, before 1967, after 1967 Nothing. No bodies. Nothing.

 

But hoaxes.

 

Stop logging onto the internet everyday, threatening to shoot something, posturing...each and every day body this body that. It’s tiresome.

 

Please answer a simple question:

 

How do you suppose the PGF got developed?

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Backdoc
17 minutes ago, Squatchy McSquatch said:

 

Dream on buddy.

 

1967, before 1967, after 1967 Nothing. No bodies. Nothing.

 

 

 

 

They claimed man landed on the moon from 1969 to early 1970s. 

 

Then Nothing.

 

50 years or so go by and yet, no more moon landings.

 

Does such criteria really mean it didn’t happen?

Edited by Backdoc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Squatchy McSquatch
56 minutes ago, Backdoc said:

 

 

They claimed man landed on the moon from 1969 to early 1970s. 

 

Then Nothing.

 

50 years or so go by and yet, no more moon landings.

 

Does such criteria really mean it didn’t happen?

 

Got Monkey?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
norseman
7 hours ago, Squatchy McSquatch said:

Again with Heironimus. 

 

Nobody said anything about glueing anything onto BobH.

 

Why would I be prepared to name someone else?  I’m not aware of anyone else who claimed to be ‘that guy’ and I’m not talking about him, and this isn’t ‘that thread’

 

Again Norse

 

Do you have any idea how the PGF was developed?

 

 

 

 

You seem to be deflecting.... kinda pitiful.

 

Your claiming Prohaska described how the hoax was done?

 

Flesh it out.... Im listening.

6 hours ago, Squatchy McSquatch said:

 

Dream on buddy.

 

1967, before 1967, after 1967 Nothing. No bodies. Nothing.

 

But hoaxes.

 

Stop logging onto the internet everyday, threatening to shoot something, posturing...each and every day body this body that. It’s tiresome.

 

Please answer a simple question:

 

How do you suppose the PGF got developed?

 

Posturing?

 

 

 

 

Edited by WV FOOTER
Edit Objectionable Text
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Squatchy McSquatch

So no thoughts on the actual development of the PGF?

 

Thanks Norse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
norseman
16 minutes ago, Squatchy McSquatch said:

So no thoughts on the actual development of the PGF?

 

Thanks Norse.

 

Your a skeptic on this forum that will attack Prohaska's testimony? But wont put yourself out there on the nuts and bolts of how the hoax was conducted?

 

And now suddenly you wanna stay on topic!?

 

Your a spineless knucklehead.

 

After I get my neck carved on? I plan on getting back in the saddle. And if I see this creature? If it exists? I will shoot it. If not thats fine too.

 

Either way its not "posturing" on a forum. Thats what you ARE Squatchy. A troll posturing on a internet forum.

 

In many ways I feel sorry for you.

 

Im simply exploring a question in my mind in some of the most beautiful scenery on Earth. You? You berate people on a internet forum to inflate your self worth to your buddies on another internet forum. LMAO!

 

As I said pathetic......

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Backdoc
10 hours ago, Squatchy McSquatch said:

 

Got Monkey?

 

It's possible Roger did.  I can't say for sure.

 

How about a Q about something which there should be no doubt should exist:

 

Got a suit where Patty is replicated in a same or similar way made with 1967 era materials?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Twist

Can this all go in the appropriate thread?   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Backdoc

Yep

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...