Jump to content

The realism of the Patterson-Gimlin Film subject cannot be replicated with a costume so; what are the possibilities? (2)


Recommended Posts

xspider1

Thank-you for the update, BC.  Keep feeling better, Bill M.  It would be great to see you posting again on the BFF, keeping it real!  :thumbsup:

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 months later...
Backdoc

Interesting video of the interview between Renee Dahinden and Dr. Grieve from early 1970s.  Many of the quotes and opinion of Dr. Grieve’s PGF analysis can be heard here as the source:

 

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • gigantor featured this topic
SackScratch
On 4/27/2019 at 2:54 PM, Huntster said:

The William Roe sketch was even hotter. That babe looked and sounded younger than Patty. She's got perky breasts. Same nasty hairdo, though..........

35461D87-1F72-4E76-8FF7-27A0F5D43BBC.jpeg

 

not much booty for twerkin'!!

Mike-Hawkins-Photographs-XSMPX2.jpg

big Ape in Gulf Breeze, Florida

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
SackScratch

IMG_20200421_072304.jpg

I think Humans future is either Planet of the Apes or Soylent Green!!  or maybe Logan's Run if we're lucky... lol

 

maybe Bigfoot's are responsible for all the missing hunters, hikers and campers like shown in "Missing 411 the Hunted" dvd!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • gigantor unfeatured this topic
  • 2 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Kent Walker

IMHO, it boils down to this: either you think the PGF is real or it's a man in a monkey suit. There seems to be no middle ground

Link to post
Share on other sites
BlackRockBigfoot
47 minutes ago, Kent Walker said:

IMHO, it boils down to this: either you think the PGF is real or it's a man in a monkey suit. There seems to be no middle ground

What other middle ground option would there be?  There was no CGI back then.  It's certainly not a lens flare nor a misidentified known animal.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
Kent Walker
3 hours ago, BlackRockBigfoot said:

What other middle ground option would there be?  There was no CGI back then.  It's certainly not a lens flare nor a misidentified known animal.  

didn't I say there's no middle ground? It seems that you are disagreeing me me agreeing with you

Link to post
Share on other sites
BlackRockBigfoot

Who's disagreeing with you? 

 

There is no possible middle ground that makes any sense.  I don't even think that there is another camp that thinks anything other than 'real' or 'hoaxed'.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
OldMort
9 hours ago, Kent Walker said:

IMHO, it boils down to this: either you think the PGF is real or it's a man in a monkey suit. There seems to be no middle ground

 

You are correct the PGF is either real or its a man in a monkey suit. Indisputable.

 

However, there certainly is middle ground in which one of those we think it is.

 

To some of us the footage remains inconclusive.

 

There are many "fence-sitters" as far as the authenticity of this home movie.

 

Where do you stand?

 

ETA: Oh dear, banned already? Whoosh...

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by OldMort
  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
norseman

Kent..... was the man in the suit! He has been hoaxing us for years! 

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
BlackRockBigfoot
4 minutes ago, norseman said:

Kent..... was the man in the suit! He has been hoaxing us for years! 

Yup. He just couldn't leave the subject alone.

 

 

Like a killer retuning to the scene of his crime...

Edited by BlackRockBigfoot
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
OldMort
13 minutes ago, norseman said:

Kent..... was the man in the suit!

 

Nah, Kent's IM ratios don't match. 

 

When I have time I will post some GIF's and break out my colored crayons...

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
×
×
  • Create New...