Jump to content
ShadowBorn

Has this been asked about the PGF before

Recommended Posts

OldMort
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Bill said:

I reasonably wouldn't expect such when trying to recall something that happened 45 years earlier. 

 

Personally, I would expect a far better and more detailed recollection of what was arguably the biggest day of Gimlin's life.

 

This was not just any random day.

 

The events that occurred at Bluff Creek contributed to shaping his life to this very day.

 

These are not difficult questions to answer - I would think the memories of that day have swirled through Bob's mind ten thousand times over the decades.

 

I'm pushing 70 now and can still recall vividly my most important and special times 45 and 50 years ago.

 

We tend to come back to those memories in order to relive them if just for a moment, over and over again. 

 

Granted, minor details may be inaccurate and colored or faded by the years, but early documentation of the events and statements did and does exist.

 

We are all different, but I'm quite confident that Bob could fill in some of the gaps if he chose to do so...

 

 

Edited by OldMort
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
norseman
3 minutes ago, OldMort said:

 

Personally, I would expect a far better and more detailed recollection of what was arguably the biggest day of Gimlin's life.

 

This was not just any random day.

 

The events that occurred at Bluff Creek contributed to shaping his life to this very day.

 

These are not difficult questions to answer - I would think the memories of that day have swirled through Bob's mind ten thousand times over the decades.

 

I'm pushing 70 now and can still recall vividly my most important and special times 45 and 50 years ago.

 

We tend to come back to those memories in order to relive them if just for a moment, over and over again. 

 

Granted, minor details may be inaccurate and colored or faded by the years, but early documentation of the events and statements did and does exist.

 

I'm quite confident that Bob could fill in some of the gaps if he chose to do so...

 

 

 

My mother in law lives in our basement and has no idea who we are or who she is. She is 74.

 

Your almost 70 and have a awesome memory. I think that’s great! But I don’t think that it’s uncommon for someone 80 plus years old to have memory loss.

 

I also feel like the camera was Roger’s deal. Bob just helped out.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Huntster
22 minutes ago, OldMort said:

 

Personally, I would expect a far better and more detailed recollection of what was arguably the biggest day of Gimlin's life.

 

This was not just any random day.

 

The events that occurred at Bluff Creek contributed to shaping his life to this very day.

 

These are not difficult questions to answer - I would think the memories of that day have swirled through Bob's mind ten thousand times over the decades.

 

I'm pushing 70 now and can still recall vividly my most important and special times 45 and 50 years ago.........

 

I have an excellent memory, and remember my wedding day 43 years ago quite well, but for God's sake I can't tell you what color socks I wore, what hors d'oeuvres were served, who was there and who was not, the name of the rather famous Alaskan photographer who recorded the event, or countless other details of the day. 

 

My brother, nearly 3 years younger than me, can remember almost nothing of our childhood. He can't remember the names of people, or can't remember people we name off.

 

On one Alaskan adventure, when I was essentially staving off a pissed off grizzly with another man while others were skinning the one they shot, I can't remember all the guys who were on that boat. I sure remember that pissed off bear, though.

 

Not only can I excuse Gimlin for not remembering what was on which reel, I can excuse him for not knowing squat about any of the reels at all. They were pretty much in the complete control of Patterson or others, especially after the event. If Gimlin even touched the camera, it was likely only because Patterson handed it to him.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Backdoc

Does Bigfoot Stink?

 

When we think of looking for 'bigfoot' we think in terms of looking for a hairy man ape.  In that way, we think how easy it would be for a person- sized thing to stay hidden.  

 

Isn't this a mistake?  What about Smell?

 

We are told that Bigfoot stinks.  If bigfoot stink then doesn't this increase  the 'size' of the target?   If I am lost in the woods a helicopter might fly right over me and not see me.  If I light a signal fire, that same helicopter might see me (the fire smoke) from a mile away.

 

If bigfoot smells so bad  wouldn't bigfoot be a 'target' the size of its stink.  If you can smell a bigfoot from 50 yards away, then bigfoot is essentially a 100 yard across circular target. (heck, ad a good hunting dog to the party and now it might be many times that distance).

 

Why doesn't the smell often reported help give bigfoot away?  

 

Bigfoot's reported smell should make it not just a little easier but much easier.  It should be like trying to hide in the dark while carrying a flashlight.

 

The smell should make Bigfoot a dead give away.  The ONLY issue would be the range of smell.  That is, does it stink just within 5 feet, 10 feet, 50 feet away?   I think in the PGF encounter Gimlin reported smelling (or maybe the horses did) Patty before they saw Patty.

 

Why isn't the smell a dead give away?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Catmandoo

They do not have a 'give-away' location smell all of the time. The pungent odor release is controlled. Windage is a factor. Patty was probably up wind of Roger and Bob.  Sasquatch hunting method is 'point blank'. If they smelled bad all of the time, they would be vegetarians.

Humans have a poor sense of smell relative to wild animals and your pets. Horses have a very different sense of smell. Tear gas does not have any effect on horses therefore you see them in tear gas crowd control situations.

There are dead zones in forests where one would expect a lot of wild life. Animals avoid those areas. Olfactory signaling / 'signage' from Sasquatch comes to mind in the way of marking their territory or leaving a scent trail due to frequent traveling. A scent trail would be weather sensitive.

From time to time I think about 'tracking' / sampling an area with a portable gas chromatography unit. Not available 'off the shelf'. One would have to have a unit made to sniff out Androstanes ( big assumption ). Very expensive.  Test it at a zoo in the ape area then red line it at a rave.  The sampling area would be so small that I consider such a device one notch above a ghost meter. Still, something to think about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Backdoc

Q:  Did anyone else report seeing Roger and Bob in the area of Bluff Creek around fall of 1967?

 

I don't doubt they were there.  I just wonder if they ever stopped or were spotted by others in any other small town, hunter, DNR Ranger, or whomever?

 

The reason I ask is the logic of needing 3 people to fake the film.  That is, if spotted, shouldn't there have been 3 people spotted instead of just Roger and Bob if Patty was a man in a suit?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SWWASAS

Well I was within 20 yards of two BF and smelled nothing.    Then again the wind was blowing the smell away from me and mine towards them.    That wind likely prevented me from having a very close encounter  because I think they smelled me before they saw me because of thick underbrush.     Since one of the two was a juvenile being carried the second was likely female.     Perhaps only males make the stink?  

 

I think sound detection would have a better range than smell detection and be a lot less expensive.    BF make a very low frequency thud even as they move quietly.    I can just barely pick it up at the low range of my hearing.   Two or three probes and an oscilloscope and you should be able to get direction and distance.   Bear or any heavy animal likely would make the thuds but it should be easy to discern the bipedal foot falls from a quadruped.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Backdoc
1 hour ago, SWWASAS said:

Well I was within 20 yards of two BF and smelled nothing.    Then again the wind was blowing the smell away from me and mine towards them.    That wind likely prevented me from having a very close encounter  because I think they smelled me before they saw me because of thick underbrush.     Since one of the two was a juvenile being carried the second was likely female.     Perhaps only males make the stink?  

  

 

SWWASAS,

 

I wonder if you took 100 people with an encounter what % would say they smelled something.  I think Roger said something with Patty like the smell of a wet dog if I remember right in that reported encounter.  I always think of TV shows involving reported sightings and it just seems to me many will say they smelled something unpleasant but Strong Smelling.  I guess I am getting at the idea we think to 'see' a Bigfoot we would think of the limitations of trying to actually see one with our eyes.   That would be expected to be a tall order unless one randomly came across one.  I say that no diff than if some Army Ranger was trying to hide in the woods as 3 campers walked by on a forested path.  That would be expected to be a piece of cake to hide for a trained Army Ranger.   Yet, if that Ranger had a camp, a boom box with loud music, a campfire cooking yummy food, those things all would make one say, "Hey there must be some people over there."  At that point the hikers increase their chance of either catching the person or noticing them if they attempt to hide.   I see Bigfoot the same way.  Even if patty was hiding and IF she was really skinky Gimlin and Roger would likely stop and look closer.  This would increase the chance of catching her hiding.  They would ride right by if she did not stink (if they didn't see her).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SackScratch
On 5/6/2019 at 10:59 PM, Bill said:

Thank you. I must admit to being dumbfounded that a purely technical and factual answer of laboratory procedures is somehow "disapproved". It reminds me of our dear departed court jester, Squatchy, who voted down a posting of mine that was pure fact and technical reference. Maybe some people are offended that i actually have some knowledge to contribute to the discussion.

 

Oh well. I'll just continue to dwell in the land of facts, knowledge, and truth. Nice place to live.

 

Bill

 

It's the Ghost of Leroy Blevins! 

 

If he was alive he'd put a Thumbs Down on 90% of the postings in this forum for sure! 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...