Jump to content
JustAGuy

A new first gen. copy of the PGF film may have been discovered

Recommended Posts

Bill

The single most telling aspect of Mr. Johnson's described policy about this copy of the PGf is that he doesn't want it properly analyzed. Instead, he wants to hide it from analysis. If he really had confidence the film was a hoax, he should be confident the proof is within the film, and if he believes he has the original (which he almost certainly doesn't), then he should want it properly analyzed so it may prove the hoax he imagines. I've read posts by other skeptics who think the original is hidden because it will prove a hoax. This gentleman seems to be taking the point of view that the film must be hidden from proper analysis, so the myth of a hoax can be perpetuated.

 

Unfortunately, his actions will more likely insure that his copy will simply be forgotten, as insignificant to the PGF mystery and research effort.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OldMort

I think this guy is just seeking some attention or notoriety.

 

He mentioned that he was surprised about the "silence of the bigfoot community" so far and then took a nasty shot at the BFF in particular.

 

Unless he can provide any evidence and soon, I have to conclude that his story is a hoax.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bill

I don't doubt that he has a real copy of the film. But it likely isn't the original, as there are just too many holes in the story and description. So I'm not sure hoax is the proper way to describe his claim. To me, misguided is the more operative word.

 

But it was funny how he went on about the kodachrome processing, and was describing things that even the most imaginative person in this forum has never claimed about bootleg and home/garage processing options. Bottom line is the film was processed perfectly, by some facility that had the right machine, the right chemicals, and the right knowledge to do it perfectly. He seems to want to entertain a more fanciful scenario.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Twist

I agree, given the circumstances and available information, its points towards a misidentification and/or a hoax.    

 

I'm curious about SY's analysis of the timing.    We'll see what he comes up with.   😅

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SweatyYeti

^

The film was most definitely shot later than 1:30 PM.

 

See if you can figure out how that can be determined....(from data contained within the film images, plus a little bit of outside data.)

 

We'll wait.....for a long time.  🤣  

Edited by SweatyYeti

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...