Jump to content

Trail Cam Bigfoot Pics


Recommended Posts

Huntster
50 minutes ago, SackScratch said:

it's getting to the point where to be politically correct they will just say that anything without canine teeth is part of the Human Family Homo as long as it was a biped!!........

 

That sounds like a good basis for the genus to me. It's certainly a better biological basis than tool use, brain size, spiritual behaviors, imagined behaviors, or imagined intellect. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
SackScratch
3 hours ago, Huntster said:

 

That sounds like a good basis for the genus to me. It's certainly a better biological basis than tool use, brain size, spiritual behaviors, imagined behaviors, or imagined intellect. 

 

if someone actually bags a Bigfoot Body and throws it on a table for the Scientists to dissect I bet they'll throw Bigfoot into the Human Family Tree with everything else afterwards!  

 

The only one that managed to avoid Humans hunting and inter-species breeding prowess for hundreds of thousands of years that rendered all the others Extinct...

Link to post
Share on other sites
Somerset

Why would the government have any more or better proof of BF than whats currently out there? Other than manpower i dont think they have anything in the armoury that Joe public hasn't used.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
BlackRockBigfoot
BFF Donor
25 minutes ago, Somerset said:

Why would the government have any more or better proof of BF than whats currently out there? Other than manpower i dont think they have anything in the armoury that Joe public hasn't used.  

Bleeding edge technology, unlimited funding, aircraft and drones, access to specialists in any imaginable field, the ability to silence or even detain witnesses in the name of national security, access to records unavailable to the average person....

 

The have a few more resources than me, at least.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Huntster
22 minutes ago, Somerset said:

Why would the government have any more or better proof of BF than whats currently out there? Other than manpower i dont think they have anything in the armoury that Joe public hasn't used.  

 

First of all, government has continuity. In other words, it lives a whole lot longer than Joe Sixpack the Sasquatch Hunter. The United States Forest Service has been existence since 1881. Secondly, government is the 9,000 lb Landowning Gorilla in the room. Government owns the majority of land in the western United States. If sasquatches exist, they can be found on government land. So combine those two factors; government has been in control if the majority of the land, and there has been an agency specifically charged with forest management for the past 140 years (and the Department of the Interior goes bak an additional 32 years).

 

If sasquatches exist, it's almost unbelievable that government doesn't know about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
SackScratch

one tiny alteration is the path of Humans (Homo Erectus) extermination of the many species of Biped Apes in Africa and this would be Humans today, just another Hunting Game to end up being heads hanging on walls! 

 

IMG_20200421_072304.jpg

 

it's strange that Homo Erectus left Africa after exterminating all the Biped Apes there (also breeding with them), then went into Europe and Asia and bred with Neanderthals and Denisovans and they call the hybrid "Human"... it's no coincidence that Neanderthals and most big game animals went Extinct not long after Homo Erectus arrived on the scene!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
SWWASAS
BFF Donor
15 hours ago, Somerset said:

Why would the government have any more or better proof of BF than whats currently out there? Other than manpower i dont think they have anything in the armoury that Joe public hasn't used.  

You must not be aware of the reported presence of BF on military installations.      Something coming and going from secure military installations is not going to be ignored.   It would be investigated and a determination made if it was a threat to national security.   Depending on the installation,   the military is authorized to use deadly force.    That would not be limited to M-16s which are simply not enough weapon for a adult male BF.    If one or more was killed they certainly would be examined as part of the investigation related to national security.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
Somerset
On 4/23/2020 at 5:47 PM, SWWASAS said:

You must not be aware of the reported presence of BF on military installations.      Something coming and going from secure military installations is not going to be ignored.   It would be investigated and a determination made if it was a threat to national security.   Depending on the installation,   the military is authorized to use deadly force.    That would not be limited to M-16s which are simply not enough weapon for a adult male BF.    If one or more was killed they certainly would be examined as part of the investigation related to national security.  

I'm aware of all that and the other posts in reply to my comment but all said and told based on posts on here and eye witness reports etc the BF would still be one step ahead no matter how many men you had or how powerful your gun's are, if anything some of the things in your governments armoury would actually work against them with BF in the field.

Don't get me wrong i'm sure they know and i'm sure they believe but as for the government having one in captivity then no, having a body now that's different but i'd still say no, that would under estimate something that's stayed hidden for 1000's of years and understands every blase of grass it walks on even if the military own it and the signs say it shouldn't really be there.  

 

Huntster, if you want continuity mate live in the UK, most of my thatched cottage is 500 years old :D

Edited by Somerset
Link to post
Share on other sites
Huntster
3 hours ago, Somerset said:

.....having a body now that's different but i'd still say no, that would under estimate something that's stayed hidden for 1000's of years........

 

I'm theorizing that New World governments (Canada and the U.S.) may have known (gotten a specimen) about sasquatches no earlier than @ 1885 and no later than @ 1950. Russia, China, India, and the Himilayan/Caucasus/Pamir/Altai nations? Maybe earlier, but instability within those governments kept the information/specimens from surviving the early 20th Century. Today, I can see all such governments agreeing to keep their knowledge secret and discourage "discovery".

 

.........Huntster, if you want continuity mate live in the UK, most of my thatched cottage is 500 years old 

:D

 

LOL! Agreed! In addition to a very few aboriginal stone structures dating back to before 1500, the New World is........well, new. And we tend to build with a disposable attitude. Alaska is especially young. The first Europeans didn't arrive until the 1780's, and the natives here built with wood and skins.

Link to post
Share on other sites
SWWASAS
BFF Donor
20 hours ago, Somerset said:

I'm aware of all that and the other posts in reply to my comment but all said and told based on posts on here and eye witness reports etc the BF would still be one step ahead no matter how many men you had or how powerful your gun's are, if anything some of the things in your governments armoury would actually work against them with BF in the field.

Don't get me wrong i'm sure they know and i'm sure they believe but as for the government having one in captivity then no, having a body now that's different but i'd still say no, that would under estimate something that's stayed hidden for 1000's of years and understands every blase of grass it walks on even if the military own it and the signs say it shouldn't really be there.  

 

Huntster, if you want continuity mate live in the UK, most of my thatched cottage is 500 years old :D

I cannot imagine a BF being captured.    They are several times as fast as humans on the ground which means you cannot chase them down and dart them and are so wary of anything made by humans trapping them seems very unlikely to me too.      Darting from a helicopter would be nearly impossible in most wooded areas.     I would imagine the military would simply have shot a few to figure out what they were dealing with and if they decided it was not foreign and a creature native to NA, decided just to tolerate their presence.    Perhaps they did have people who got close enough to observe them in the wild and determine their level of intelligence.    It would sort of take that to even get close enough to shoot one because of how elusive they are.     But a good sniper could take one down with a big sniper rifle from quite a distance out.  I can well imagine that older BF have eye issues like humans and cannot see very well as they age.   That might allow a sniper to get close enough to get a shot without being seen by the BF.   

Edited by SWWASAS
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • gigantor unfeatured this topic
SackScratch

anyone know the story behind this photo and when exactly it was taken?  I've gotten conflicting data on it over the years, any BFRO people on here know if the case is in the BFRO database?

IMG_20191030_020645.jpg

IMG_20191030_021137.jpg

one internet posting on it said it was taken in the 1950's or 60's by a camper in Oregon via a Polaroid camera with B&W film.

  this is a cropped pic, does anyone have a copy of the un-cropped version?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Alex L. S.

I think that looking at all these pictures, I don't find a pattern of the creature. If they were all real, then it should admit many subspecies of big foot.
:mellow:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Catmandoo
BFF Donor

Looks fake. Polaroid, the original selfie,  was not convenient back in the day. B&W photos had to coated with a fixer. There was a tube with  a little squeegee. It was messy to coat to film. The life of a Polaroid image depended on several factors such as the fixer procedure, storage and handling. Dark storage helped the lifespan.

The above image is a colorized B&W image. Bad idea. It has had very bad storage and handling. Manual colorization is an artistic endeavor. I can't tell if the phony age lines are supposed to be folds or scratches. Folds and scratches are death because the chemicals are in the substrate.

It is a colorized stump.

Edited by Catmandoo
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites
SackScratch
11 hours ago, Alex L. S. said:

I think that looking at all these pictures, I don't find a pattern of the creature. If they were all real, then it should admit many subspecies of big foot.
:mellow:

 

look how different humans look and they're all considered the same species... look at the 7'1'' Shaquille O'Neal who foot size has been compared to Bigfoot prints in recent Bigfoot Documentaries and TV shows as the length shows the Bigfoot print lengths is not out of the extreme range of Human foot lengths!!  It's the width is the difference... Shaq and his tiny wife look like they're from different planets but both are Human.  In recent years it's been found that Humans are hybrids of Homo Erectus, Neanderthals and Denisovans inter-breeding and they all looked very different!  After these findings they just started lumping the sub-humans as part of our family tree!  When I was a kid they said Neanderthals were savage cave dwelling cannibals that were basically tool making Ape-men...  In Sub-Saharan African populations they've found no Neanderthal or Denisovan DNA but have found other extinct sub-species they bred with in the past...

 

Thing is, with this much diversity in Human appearances within the same species why wouldn't there be even more diversity in something like Giganto if it's survived Humans all this time by staying hidden and existed for millions of years before Humans came along!?!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • gigantor featured this topic
  • gigantor unfeatured this topic
  • gigantor pinned, unpinned and featured this topic
×
×
  • Create New...