All Activity

It's neither here nor there, but I'd like to again point out Heironomous claims he was to be paid $1000 for his supposed stroll in a bigfoot costume. That's a ridiculously high sum of money.

Last Friday night I was having a wonderful dinner at an Italian restaurant when I text rolled in from a number I could not identify: " I think I saw a bigfoot and I heard your the person to talk to. This is Zac In Jack's's backyard" I will admit to being very confused at first and showed it to my wife. She figured out that Zac was the 13 year old kid living to our left and Jack was his best friend that lived in the house to our right and that he has a bigfoot . 3-4 years ago Jack's dad told me about a weird encounter he had walking down the road very late at night. I explained it was probably a bigfoot and I explained to him my history with them over the last 25 years. The next day he and his two kids explored the woods behind our houses and finds what looks to be a very crude hunting blind and maybe nest built a few yards away from a downed tree. The kids turned the blind (basically 6 stacked limbs against a very large downed tree) in to a fort that basically resembled a large Teepee complete with tarp, kind of a door, and adorned with a deer antler. They played with it for a year or two before moving on to other things leaving their fort abandoned and slowly falling a part. I am very familiar with this area as I exercise my dogs in this little slither of woods separating 4 houses from a lake. The next morning after receiving the text I looked around the woods to see if there was any evidence of a bigfoot as I was skeptical (the actual time of the year is perfect, but a sighting at that time of the day in the open is unprecedented) and figured it was a bear coming out of hibernation. There were a couple of things out of place but that could have been anything and my dog picked up nothing. And then I saw the fort had been completely redesigned in to 3 separate blinds. One facing up the woods, one facing down the woods, and the third facing the lake. All very neatly placed with an easy ingress and egress and some interesting engineering. The log holding the lake-facing blind had been moved to that position as it was the main support log in the center of the teepee. What do y'all think of the fort turned hunting blind? To be continued.

https://www.deatleycrushing.com https://virtualglobetrotting.com/map/al-deatleys-house/view/google/

Roger Patterson burnt the alleged suit because he wanted to get rid of evidence but felt the need to keep the rehearsal Film, which is claimed he himself filmed lolololololololololz yeah, the logic is starting to make complete sense..

The beauty of the PGF is that, it doesn’t provide any proof that Sasquatch is real, but it can’t be disproven either. The film is inconclusive. And that’s what makes it great. Both sides can only make claims. Nothing so far has been definitive

I’m just trying to follow the claims the other side is making. For decades it was claimed by Bob H that he was the one in the suit and his what, 2005 recreation of it in a very inferior looking suit isn’t convincing. Now there’s this other guy, DeAtley, who I’ve never heard of in BiGFO0Tery, is a person the other side is claiming to be in the rehearsal suit.

I am a believer in Sasquatch but I can’t outright say that the PGF isn’t some fat dude in a latex, skin tight suit with ape looking hair on it. If anything suit in the late 60’s could be superior than today’s stuff since people actual did a quality job back then With that said, Pattys right pectoral muscle twitch, flex, and movement as she turned to look at the camera looks genuine muscle fiber moving and on a large relic hominid creature and not something faked. You see bodybuilders make those pec flexes especially in side chest poses. I can do it to.

Was it a suit? What did Gimlin say? Was it a full confession? That’s the only thing that would seal Patty’s fate in my mind I don’t trust the mystery film it could have been made after Patty and the date is just the freshness date when it was manufactured?

Just answered my own question. The claims are that DeAtley was in the 40 second rehearsal and Bob H was in the actual 1967 PGF. I’m just trying to follow the claims.

So who was in the suit? Bob heroinimois or Deatley?

Yes people were saying that picture in the trailer was from the mystery 1966 film. It was not it’s a frame from the PGF with filters applied to it.

Yeah, I’m still confused how the image above is supposed to disprove the PGF?

That’s a frame from the 1967 film. It comes after frame 352.

In the spirit of the topic! Favorite LB song ever, and I do not even hunt (but I will wet a line once in awhile...).

Is that not just after frame 352? That is the exact rock/stick formations from Bluff Creek, the 66 footage isn’t in Bluff Creek from what I’ve read. Just looks like a filter over the Patterson footage.

Looks to me like a Dfoot re-run.

It’s from the trailer

I sent a link to Sircalum's picture to Eric/Hairy Man Road, asking him to confirm that it is a still from the new documentary footage in question. Hopefully I get a reply soon 🤞🤞

Blobsquatch!

Please welcome my special guest tonight. Twelve-year-old Bentley St John says he's 'pretty mad' about getting hit while crossing at a crosswalk. His family wants the driver to turn themselves in to police. Listen to the Podcast

Source?

so is this supposed to be pro PGF or pro capturing sasquatch?

Here is the documentary pre-Patty Bigfoot!

So allegedly Patterson burnt the patty suit in a barrel which took 30 minutes but didn’t burn the rehearsal footage.. how convenient!

Bob Gymlan correctly splashes big bucket of cold water on the debunking, saying "Wait, hold your horses." He states that it will all boil down to the realism of the "rehearsal" footage.