Forums
-
Bigfoot Discussion
-
- 203.3k
- posts
-
- Best Circumstantial Evidence
- By norseman,
-
- 20.6k
- posts
-
- 360 trail camera
- By norseman,
-
- 17.9k
- posts
-
- 129.3k
- posts
-
- By Trogluddite,
-
- 20.6k
- posts
-
- By Trogluddite,
-
- 384
- posts
-
- By bipedalist,
-
- 327
- posts
-
- Idaho 1902 - Idaho's Wild Man
- By Trogluddite,
-
- 10.5k
- posts
-
- 1k
- posts
-
- Texas Bigfoot Conference - Oct. 16 & 17, 2026
- By OkieFoot,
-
- 17
- posts
-
-
Welcome to The Bigfoot Forums
-
- 3.2k
- posts
-
- New Member Introductions
- By Mgivens187,
-
- 3
- posts
-
- Community Rules and Guidelines
- By gigantor,
-
- 11
- posts
-
- Welcome Our New Director!
- By joebeelart,
-
-
BFF Library
-
- 56
- posts
-
- 29
- posts
-
- Not a Yeti? John Napier, Lawrence Swan, And The Footprint That Made Shipton Famous
- By Patterson-Gimlin,
-
- 70
- posts
-
- 25
- posts
-
- By Catmandoo,
-
- 763
- posts
-
- 72
- posts
-
-
The Tar Pit
-
- 86.9k
- posts
-
- By VAfooter,
-
- 25.4k
- posts
-
- By VAfooter,
-
- 903
- posts
-
- By VAfooter,
-
-
Who was online
- norseman
- OldMort
- Incorrigible1
- Trogluddite
- downtownbrown
- xspider1
- Tom
- JKH
- VAfooter
- Audrey
- guyzonthropus
- DrPSH
- BigTime1967
- Airdale
- Northern Lights
-
Latest Posts
-
By xspider1 · Posted
Well said and, I think I understand (at least that last sentence). % ) There is a 'School of Thought' that proposes the idea that human beings came into existence as a result of genetic altering. Without going too far into the woo aspects; that might explain our meteoric rise to world domination.. And, perhaps, Bigfoot are the result of deliberate genetic altering as well. I know that gets away from the OP a bit but, it does circle back to circumstantial evidence. Apparently, by definition, all of the evidence of Bigfoot (any everything else, really) is circumstantial, (exempting eyewitnesses, of course) until proven by Science. So, to me, the circumstantial evidence for Bigfoot points directly to their undeniable existence and, therefore, to the undeniable conclusion that we are missing, or deliberately avoiding, 1 or more pieces of the puzzle. -
-
By norseman · Posted
It was theorized it crawled. It’s just much harder for soft soled critters to be tracked. I have been on Bear trails that were completely matted down. But not any individual bear tracks that could be observed. And then there is the whole intelligence thing. If Homo Naledi was burying its dead? And Homo Erectus was tracking an animal to exhaustion? Surely Sasquatch understands it’s leaving tracks. The ones we find either cannot be helped or it didn’t care if we found them. Not saying Sasquatch is inventing the longer lasting light bulb. But it’s gonna be on a whole other level than say a Bear. And Bears crawl and roll around as well. Just because they can. Not because they are not wanting to leave tracks. But Elk are gonna leave hoof tracks when they stand up out of a bedded position. Just a much smaller foot print per animal size and very hard. Which makes them and all ungulates much easier to track. IMHO. -
By Backdoc · Posted
Were there obvious Bigfoot footprints in the area? How did bigfoot get there? slide or crawl for instance. I might be blinded by my expectations but I would expect Bigfoot footprints provided there is soil which allowed other footprints -
By Patterson-Gimlin · Posted
It certainly is. Well said.
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
VAfooter
10 -
2
Backdoc
5 -
3
Trogluddite
5 -
4
norseman
5 -
5
Incorrigible1
5
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Total Members1,540
-
Most Online2,678
Newest Member
downtownbrown
Joined -
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics90.7k
-
Total Posts994.8k
-