Forums
-
Bigfoot Discussion
-
- 203.8k
- posts
-
- 20.7k
- posts
-
- Ultralight canoe and a thermal
- By norseman,
-
- 18.3k
- posts
-
- 129.6k
- posts
-
- By AtlantiS,
-
- 20.6k
- posts
-
- By georgerm,
-
- 384
- posts
-
- By bipedalist,
-
- 323
- posts
-
- Florida 1872 - San Pedro Bay Wildman
- By Trogluddite,
-
- 10.6k
- posts
-
- 1k
- posts
-
- Blue Ridge Bigfoot Fest - September 26, 2026
- By OkieFoot,
-
- 17
- posts
-
-
Welcome to The Bigfoot Forums
-
- 3.3k
- posts
-
- New Member Introductions
- By IanM,
-
- 3
- posts
-
- Community Rules and Guidelines
- By gigantor,
-
- 11
- posts
-
- Welcome Our New Director!
- By joebeelart,
-
-
BFF Library
-
- 56
- posts
-
- 29
- posts
-
- Not a Yeti? John Napier, Lawrence Swan, And The Footprint That Made Shipton Famous
- By Patterson-Gimlin,
-
- 70
- posts
-
- 25
- posts
-
- By Catmandoo,
-
- 1k
- posts
-
- 74
- posts
-
-
The Tar Pit
-
- 87k
- posts
-
- By VAfooter,
-
- 25.4k
- posts
-
- By Incorrigible1,
-
- 903
- posts
-
- By VAfooter,
-
-
Who was online
- Babar1296
- Incorrigible1
- Willcreek
- JKH
- psrg
- Rainshadow
- RedHawk454
- JohnP3907
- LocalGayCryptid
- Ljlep40
- Buckaloo
- Huntster
- AtlantiS
- BlackRockBigfoot
- Nellie
- xspider1
- Gryphon66
- SEBigfoot
- IanM
- jameskrav
- MIB
- OrangutanFlaps
- norseman
- Ike
- PBeaton
-
Latest Posts
-
By Huntster · Posted
Key word: Army.. The Army has been deeply involved in the west since 1850, and in the capacity of a military occupier in native American lands. This is well before the current crop and power of biology and ecological land management agencies. In fact, it's before the mere concept of ecological management of lands. Part of there native American heritage is the existence of sasquatches, and the Native American belief that these were wild people, not "animals". The Army still has military lands, some of which are in areas which feature very active and recurring sasquatch sightings reports. The Army has a culture of secrecy and managing sensitive information. The Army has its own biologists tasked with cooperating with state agencies regarding wildlife and setting the Army's own goals managing wildlife on Army lands. I again focus on Ft. Lewis, WA. If there is any government lands where active sasquatch study has occurred, it's there. They may very well have obtained a carcass or bones at some point within the past century. What they would do with it after their own examination is anybody's guess. -
By norseman · Posted
Which for me? If true? Means the Government knows they exist. And they have covered it up by making the subject taboo. Anyone who rocks the boat draws the full ire of the bureaucracy. And if there is an army of Biologists, Botanists, etc (USFS, USPS, BLM) out there? What sort of evidence has been collected that is better than us amateurs? -
By georgerm · Posted
The Forest Service does have an army of biologist, but the problem is they never can get into big formation and march like an army to prove Bigfoot. I spent quite a bit of time in the Forest Service. I knew our biologist who was just one person, and he had to manage wildlife for 1,700,000 acres of the Rogue River National Forest. There are 154 National Forest across America and each one of them has a wildlife biologist . Their job was to make sure the wildlife would not be harmed by logging operations. However, their job was not to manage bigfoots since they had not been proven and they knew it was a taboo subject. This person would probably be fired If they began to write reports on Bigfoot. These wildlife biologists knew that Bigfoot is off limits therefore they had better not be writing them up in investigations. The Forest Service is composed of 154 national forest and each one of those forests had one wildlife biologist. This army of wildlife biologists probably noticed Bigfoot evidence on occasion, but they also knew that they had better not be reporting on this phenomena. -
By Huntster · Posted
I'm not presenting this data to exalt the U.N. or any other government. I'm pointing out that these issues have been debated and have some basis in ethics and law, even if not down to the level of Homo hominins........yet.......... My theory is that sasquatches HAVE been "discovered" by government, and they're simply not disclosing it. I base that theory on a number of factors which I've outlined on this forum for quite some time now. And, in accordance with that theory, I believe that one of the main reasons why government has chosen to keep sasquatch existence low key is because they've studied a corpse in the past, have determined that these creatures are, indeed, hominins, and this brings a lot of legal scenarios into play, all the way up to international legalities, they just don't want to go there, I understand why, and I agree. I understand, even if I'm pretty confident that there is no "army" of government biologists out there in the wilderness. I'm very familiar with them here in Alaska, and in good sasquatch habitat (in Southeast Alaska) you can count state area biologists and federal biologists on the fingers of two hands. I believe that government is willing to accept sasquatches going extinct, but might have enough knowledge to doubt that they will........and we don't. -
By norseman · Posted
I certainly DO NOT think everything is a human invention wrapped in a secret. I think there is plenty of history going back centuries of craft doing spectacular things in the sky. Even as recent as WW2. It wasn't a secret USAF program. The USAF didn't even exist yet. Something is going on outside of humanity. What it is has been elusive. And there may be not just one clear cut answer.
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
Incorrigible1
15 -
2
Skinwalker13
14 -
3
dmaker
12 -
4
norseman
11 -
5
Backdoc
9
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Total Members1,598
-
Most Online2,678
Newest Member
Willcreek
Joined -
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics93.1k
-
Total Posts998.2k
-