Jump to content
  1. Bigfoot Discussion

    1. 203.6k
      posts
    2. In the Field

      Discussion on how to conduct oneself in the field - equipment to use, how to gather evidence etc.

      20.6k
      posts
      • BFFbot
    3. News Articles

      This section automatically collects news feeds with the words bigfoot, sasquatch and yeti in them - as such, some articles about people with big feet and monster trucks are bound to get through, so try and sort the wheat from the chaff.

      18.2k
      posts
    4. Film/Video/Photos/Audio

      A place to discuss film, video, audio & photographs of alleged bigfoot.

      129.4k
      posts
      • Backdoc
    5. 20.6k
      posts
      • Abqnurse
    6. SSR Stats and Analysis

      Standardized Sighting Record Database

      384
      posts
      • bipedalist
    7. Tirademan's Historical Newspaper Archives

      Our long time member Tirademan (R.I.P. Scott McClean) compiled this extensive archive of Sasquatch related newspaper articles and donated it to the BFF before his passing. The earliest articles in this collection are from 1818 in Florida, 1877 (Australia), 1884 (Canada) and 1764 (Europe).

      322
      posts
    8. 10.5k
      posts
    9. Conferences, Symposiums & Other Get-Togethers

      Announce or discuss conferences here.

      1k
      posts
    10. Hunting and Fishing Forum

      Show us your trophies!

      17
      posts
  2. Welcome to The Bigfoot Forums

    1. New Members - Start Here

      All New Members or Members with Zero Posts, please start here

      3.2k
      posts
    2. 3
      posts
    3. 11
      posts
  3. BFF Library

    1. Relict Hominoid Inquiry: Research Papers

      Dr. Jeff Meldrum's  Relict Hominoid Inquiry at Idaho State University

      56
      posts
    2. Relict Hominoid Inquiry: Articles, Book Reviews, Essays

      Dr. Jeff Meldrum's  RHI at Idaho State University

      29
      posts
    3. Research Papers, Books, Articles

      This section contains papers from researchers not affiliated with RHI.

      70
      posts
    4. 25
      posts
      • Catmandoo
    5. 977
      posts
    6. 74
      posts
  4. The Tar Pit

    1. Politics, Current Events

      Politics, Current Events, History

      87k
      posts
      • VAfooter
    2. Lifestyles, Humor

      Jokes, Perspectives on Life, Miscellaneous

      25.4k
      posts
      • norseman
    3. Sports and Entertainment

      Sports and the failure of the Dallas Cowboys

      903
      posts
      • VAfooter
  • BFF Registration

    Join the BFF now!

  • Who was online

      • NormalJake
      • BC witness
      • JKH
      • norseman
      • Bonehead74
      • MikeZimmer
      • xspider1
      • langfordbc
      • Backdoc
      • Huntster
      • Nellie
      • GenesRUs
      • MIB
      • VAfooter
      • dilaudipenia
      • Incorrigible1
  • Latest Posts

    • norseman
      The scenario has allegedly already happened.   We shot down their saucer in 1947 and collected and dissected their bodies.🤷🏻‍♂️   Roswell New Mexico   Science isn't going to take any high roads. The Military isn't gonna take any high roads either.    They will take the most expedient route to the maximum data dump that can be seized and controlled.      
    • xspider1
      These recent posts got me to wondering.  As an analogy:    Suppose a UFO landed and weird beings were seen emerging from the craft (could happen).  Suppose then that they set-up camp and proceeded to explore Earth, basically minding their own business.  Would the prudent thing to do be A.) immediately try to kill them so that Science can prove that extra-terrestrial beings are visiting Earth?, or B.) At least attempt to contain them (alive) and make contact?  The correct response seems obvious to me (B.)  We could be prepared to attack if necessary although attacking might not work out so good, proactively or, reactively.  As with Bigfoot, we could end up with a much better understanding of what they are and perhaps what benefits to us they might provide.  We could at least try to take the high-road, no?     
    • Huntster
      Homo sapiens are primates, too.     There is evidence that they do, and if so, that would pretty much narrow them into the genus Homo.
    • georgerm
      Humans evolved from other hominins in Africa several million years ago. Although some scientists equate humans with all members of the genus Homo, in common usage it generally refers to Homo sapiens, the only extant member. Homo sapiens emerged around 300,000 years ago and migrated out of Africa, gradually replacing local populations of archaic humans. Early humans were hunter-gatherers, before the invention of agriculture and domestication of animals led to permanent settlement in the Fertile Crescent and other cradles of civilization.   We Homo sapiens emerged 300,000 years ago and we replaced archaic humans. I suppose the Neanderthals are the archaic humans and bigfoot is probably some kind of advanced primate and not human. Bigfoot is short of being an archaic human but seems to be highly intelligent for avoiding capture for this long? Does bigfoot have a spoken language?
    • Huntster
      Homo sapiens are also apes, although if you call somebody an "ape", they will almost certainly be offended.
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      norseman
      norseman
      4
    2. 2
      VAfooter
      VAfooter
      4
    3. 3
      Backdoc
      Backdoc
      4
    4. 4
      MIB
      MIB
      3
    5. 5
      georgerm
      georgerm
      3
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      1,562
    • Most Online
      2,678

    Allie
    Newest Member
    Allie
    Joined
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      91.9k
    • Total Posts
      996.5k
×
×
  • Create New...