Forums

I’d say these are good points but ultimately the wrong question being asked.      We should assume any hoax requires destroying any evidence it’s a hoax.  We think that’s the suit and it is.  But, it’s also any photo or film of any dry run.  It’s a given the suit would be destroyed immediately or soon after the PGF money tour once they knew it wouldn’t be needed again.    Whatever the method, we can all believe-an accept -the suit would get destroyed.   the real question:  why would ANYONE involved in a hoax record evidence On Film of a hoax?     There is nothing about this point making any sense.  No one involved in any hoax would film any “dry run” of such a hoax and would destroy such a film right away if a pre-PGF would be needed.  No one developing such a film would sneak off and make a secret copy.  There would be no need to.  It’s a job.  Develop the film.  If the film was developed in secret like the PFG likely was the developer doesn’t keep a copy around.   Makes no sense.   Further they are trying to hide the fact they did a favor for someone in sneaky development.     if Bob Heironimus came forward back in the day claiming to be the man in the suit AND TOOK PHOTOS of the suit that is a story with promise.   We might assume he might photograph  the Patty suit on his person or displayed in the trunk of his car. Weird behavior from a loyal friend who they “knew could be trusted” but at least it makes sense.   We could further verify the photos by the fact  the suit on the photos clearly matches.     I can buy the concept Hoaxers doing a trial run to make sure the hoax looks convincing.   Unlikely but let’s assume.   But they would destroy the such a film right away.  There wouldn’t be copies made as there would be no need for a copy. Any original wouldn’t be let out of the site of the hoaxers.  They don’t keep it around or let come copy float around.   The Question has an answer.  No one gong to the trouble of a PGF level-film and allow a smoking gun to hang around.  I don’t care if it’s Kitkaze’s Patty suit under glass nonsense or a film of a “dry run”        

This is quite interesting.     

Good points Norse and why do you think South Africa may be a good place to look for primate fossils when compared to the temperate jungles of North America or places in South America or central Africa? Can someone post the link to the Otang?   Finding primate fossils in South Africa may bring clues as to the evolution and existing behavior of the South African bigfoot called the Otang. Discovering the living creature might bring more clues as to the habits of bigfoot if the Otang is proven to be identical to the other bigfoots found worldwide. The South African jungle is more confined when compared to vast jungles found in central Africa, forests of North America or jungles of South America that may help to bring about more knowledge of a flesh and blood bigfoot or a paranormal bigfoot through the study of the Otang. The paranormal feature of the common bigfoot leads me to wonder if bigfoot really evolved on Earth. The Otang will likely attract more researchers to the jungle of South Africa that may bring about more primate fossils and knowledge of the living creature.  

We are like Chimps in some ways. Google the Gombe Chimp war. Not many species fight total wars over years. We both do.   But of course there are differences as well.   Neanderthal DNA in modern humans has been linked to Autism. Autistic people don't like crowds, loud noises, being touched, etc.   https://news.clemson.edu/study-implicates-neanderthal-dna-in-autism-susceptibility/

Sorta'. His primary position is that chimps are not like us (and vice versa) even though we're so close genetically. We're more like wolves and cetaceans in social behavior, and I agree.