Forums
-
Bigfoot Discussion
-
- 203.8k
- posts
-
- 20.7k
- posts
-
- Need Help In Central Texas.........
- By Bigtex,
-
- 18.3k
- posts
-
- 129.5k
- posts
-
- By Incorrigible1,
-
- 20.6k
- posts
-
- By georgerm,
-
- 384
- posts
-
- By bipedalist,
-
- 323
- posts
-
- Florida 1872 - San Pedro Bay Wildman
- By Trogluddite,
-
- 10.6k
- posts
-
- 1k
- posts
-
- Blue Ridge Bigfoot Fest - September 26, 2026
- By OkieFoot,
-
- 17
- posts
-
-
Welcome to The Bigfoot Forums
-
- 3.2k
- posts
-
- New Member Introductions
- By BipedalCurious,
-
- 3
- posts
-
- Community Rules and Guidelines
- By gigantor,
-
- 11
- posts
-
- Welcome Our New Director!
- By joebeelart,
-
-
BFF Library
-
- 56
- posts
-
- 29
- posts
-
- Not a Yeti? John Napier, Lawrence Swan, And The Footprint That Made Shipton Famous
- By Patterson-Gimlin,
-
- 70
- posts
-
- 25
- posts
-
- By Catmandoo,
-
- 1k
- posts
-
- 74
- posts
-
-
The Tar Pit
-
- 87k
- posts
-
- By VAfooter,
-
- 25.4k
- posts
-
- By Incorrigible1,
-
- 903
- posts
-
- By VAfooter,
-
-
Who was online
- daveinal
- Sweeney
- RavenMiyazaki
- Incorrigible1
- Nellie
- dmaker
- JKH
- Wolfjewel
- Backdoc
- Rod
- jameskrav
- BC witness
- OrangutanFlaps
- OldMort
- FuzzBucket
- Limited Hangout
- okieman
- PBeaton
- RedHawk454
- xspider1
- Ningen
- Tesroc
- MIB
- LocalGayCryptid
- BlackRockBigfoot
- Mary
- gigantor
- Ljlep40
-
Latest Posts
-
By MIB · Posted
Third option: at the level that controls the purse strings, the gov't does not believe bigfoot exists so looking for them never gets taken seriously enough to be assigned. That doesn't require field people not to know about bigfoot. How do you truly rock the boat, not merely look stupid, unless you have proof in hand, and if you have proof in hand, can you prove you were not gathering that on work hours while neglecting your specifically assigned duties? -
By georgerm · Posted
I hear what you are saying Norseman, but we always have hope. It takes a spark to burn down a field of dry grass. If someone can put all the evidence, we have so far into a paper that is intended to get other scientist on board, there is always a spark or chance to make a breakthrough. There are groups of bigfooters around the country, and if someone with drive and power can organize them so they can communicate with each other, a spark in dry grass could get the ball rolling. If someone with drive and know how can put a scientific paper together so university and private biologist could sign onto the bigfoot train, then maybe the dial can be pushed forward. Oh yes, some with poo poo the subject and laugh at us. There is enough evidence presently to make bigfoot's genus and species name stick. A good hot spark would be a captured juvenile bigfoot, one wounded during hunting season, or a fresh dead one found in the woods. -
By norseman · Posted
I don't think Congress will get involved. Knowers that I have talked to just have no interest in proof. And the government agencies in question make a big joke about the subject. So here we are. 🤷🏻♂️ -
By norseman · Posted
To defend yourself from the government simply because you did THEIR job….. -
By Huntster · Posted
Because, as my theories have evolved and here arrived: the government is reluctant and avoiding discovery. Of course, my position has also evolved to accept and agree with government's position on discovery both for the good of mankind and sasquatchery. But if one is determined to prove existence, here is how you would have your best chance: 1) Cut an agreement with Matt Moneymaker. His BFRO witness reporting system appears to be the best to respond to a FRESH, high quality report, and thereby improve the odds of catching another encounter. 2) Form a team that can respond IMMEDIATELY to a fresh report. This team should be equipped with top notch big game hunters experienced in harvesting dangerous game and shooting magnum calibers with 5-10 round magazines, a houndsman with trained Karelian bear dogs, and an experienced drone operator with a pair of top quality drones with heat seeking capabilities. Finally, if possible, the resources to hire a helicopter operator who would allow hunting from the bird (like people do with hogs) would pretty much seal the harvest. It appears the BFRO produces fresh, top quality sighting reports one to two times per year. If such a team deployed three times every two years, I estimate that a dead sasquatch would be laying on the ground within four years. Then you need the top quality lawyer.........
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
Incorrigible1
20 -
2
Skinwalker13
12 -
3
dmaker
11 -
4
norseman
10 -
5
xspider1
8
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Total Members1,592
-
Most Online2,678
Newest Member
Sweeney
Joined -
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics92.9k
-
Total Posts997.9k
-