Forums

^ I think Huntster may be referring to the teeth and mandibles attributed to Gigantopithecus, georgerm.  (If not, he will probably correct me soon.)       I watched the video you linked regarding the Bulga Sphere, Huntster.  Interestingly, that is apparently about the same size and shape, and it moves similar to what I saw fly past me about 35 years ago, except the object I saw appeared almost to be on fire with orange flames.  Maybe the tiny Alien craft I saw travelled a million+ light-years but then traffic on Earth was just too much for them..   That is really a topic for a different forum, I guess.  I didn't mean to detract from this interesting topic because we have plenty to argue about discuss regarding our favorite giant human-apes.     What do many of us already know?  There are many witnesses to Bigfoot and I absolutely believe that they saw exactly what they describe but; what do they even know for sure?  Near death experiences are fascinating too, but again, no 'required proof' for Science.     I use the character: ' (open quote) not to upset anybody, but to indicate that the words contained within were said in some context, Norseman.  You said, and I quote verbatim: "Science will require one male and one female type specimen. It’s required for every extant species on the planet."  I asked you to reference that specifically which, you did not.  Instead, you want me to show your statement not to be true?  Even Science cannot prove a negative using only logic.  Your statement could only be proven false by testing which, as of now, cannot be done either.

Where did you find that we had a fossil record of bigfoot?   What do you think the buga sphere's purpose is?

"Discovery" is a sham. All it is is permission for the masses to accept what many of us already know to be true.   With regard to ghosts/spirits, we already know that people die, and later return and talk about things they couldn't possibly know. Lots and lots and lots of people. It's all just shoveled into the religion drawer, which is right above the sasquatch drawer.   We already know, and Science accepts, that sasquatch creatures have lived in the past. They have fossils. The only mystery is whether they're still around, and the evidence says that they are.   I personally don't accept extraterrestrial visits, but can't explain much of the phenomenon we see and have actually captured:      

Yes and yes.   More importantly, I think that sasquatches, when discovered, might be classified as a member of the genus Homo, and would thus be "human", not "animal", so the protections might end up being "overly".    Regarding the environmental industry, they are currently silent (and I mean completely so) with regard to sasquatchery, which is frankly suspicious, but after discovery, they'll be making more noise than a continuous nuclear detonation.

ONCE THE BIGFOOT SPECIES IS CLASSIFIED, DO YOU SEE NEW LAWS BEING PASSED THAT OVERLY PROTECT BIGFOOT'S HABITAT SO AREAS THAT WERE ONCED LOGGED ARE NOW SHUT DOWN SO BIGFOOT CAN FREELY HUNT AND BUILD HOMES? DO YOU SEE THE ENVIRONMENTAL MOVEMENT TAKING CHARGE AND HAMPERING LOGGING? (AT ONE TIME I WAS A CHOKER SETTER DURING A CAT LOGGING OPERATION AND UNDERSTAND LOGGING)