Jump to content
  1. Bigfoot Discussion

    1. 203.4k
      posts
    2. In the Field

      Discussion on how to conduct oneself in the field - equipment to use, how to gather evidence etc.

      20.6k
      posts
      • Dave Claessens
    3. News Articles

      This section automatically collects news feeds with the words bigfoot, sasquatch and yeti in them - as such, some articles about people with big feet and monster trucks are bound to get through, so try and sort the wheat from the chaff.

      18k
      posts
    4. Film/Video/Photos/Audio

      A place to discuss film, video, audio & photographs of alleged bigfoot.

      129.4k
      posts
      • Trogluddite
    5. 20.6k
      posts
      • Abqnurse
    6. SSR Stats and Analysis

      Standardized Sighting Record Database

      384
      posts
      • bipedalist
    7. Tirademan's Historical Newspaper Archives

      Our long time member Tirademan (R.I.P. Scott McClean) compiled this extensive archive of Sasquatch related newspaper articles and donated it to the BFF before his passing. The earliest articles in this collection are from 1818 in Florida, 1877 (Australia), 1884 (Canada) and 1764 (Europe).

      327
      posts
    8. 10.5k
      posts
    9. Conferences, Symposiums & Other Get-Togethers

      Announce or discuss conferences here.

      1k
      posts
    10. Hunting and Fishing Forum

      Show us your trophies!

      17
      posts
  2. Welcome to The Bigfoot Forums

    1. New Members - Start Here

      All New Members or Members with Zero Posts, please start here

      3.2k
      posts
    2. 3
      posts
    3. 11
      posts
  3. BFF Library

    1. Relict Hominoid Inquiry: Research Papers

      Dr. Jeff Meldrum's  Relict Hominoid Inquiry at Idaho State University

      56
      posts
    2. Relict Hominoid Inquiry: Articles, Book Reviews, Essays

      Dr. Jeff Meldrum's  RHI at Idaho State University

      29
      posts
    3. Research Papers, Books, Articles

      This section contains papers from researchers not affiliated with RHI.

      70
      posts
    4. 25
      posts
      • Catmandoo
    5. 866
      posts
    6. 73
      posts
  4. The Tar Pit

    1. Politics, Current Events

      Politics, Current Events, History

      86.9k
      posts
      • VAfooter
    2. Lifestyles, Humor

      Jokes, Perspectives on Life, Miscellaneous

      25.4k
      posts
      • Incorrigible1
    3. Sports and Entertainment

      Sports and the failure of the Dallas Cowboys

      903
      posts
      • VAfooter
  • BFF Registration

    Join the BFF now!

  • Who was online

      • xspider1
      • Apeman
      • MIB
      • Babar1296
      • Incorrigible1
      • JKH
      • Trogluddite
      • FieldAnomaly
      • VAfooter
      • NormalJake
      • Darkwing
      • FrankNBeauty
      • Ljlep40
      • OldMort
      • BlackRockBigfoot
  • Latest Posts

    • MIB
      We can't honestly, with any integrity, call it proof until mainstream science accepts existence of bigfoot.   That is what PROOF means.   There is no real proof but scientific proof, any lesser proof is not proof, "proof" is the wrong word for that whether it is used from ignorance, illiteracy, or just stubborn malice.    There is no way around this.   You seem to not understand what "proof" means.   You're trying to change the definition / refusing to use the existing definition.    Best of luck convincing anyone but yourself with that.
    • Doug
      Huntstir posted the DNA results.  Homo sapien.  
    • georgerm
      "Zana was named by Russian researchers after her discovery and capture in the Ochamchir region of Abkhazia, south of Russia in the 1850’s. She was said to have been living in the wilderness, naked, but covered in a thick auburn fur, and appearing to be a cross between a human and primate."     I think a DNA test was done on Zana's corpse and maybe someone can post what was discovered.
    • georgerm
      Could we conclude that for every bigfoot eyewitness plus 10, this would count as evidence and would simply be eyewitness proof for the observer? Now multiply by a 1000 an each eyewitness is a PHD biologist. Is this proof? What do we need for proof?
    • georgerm
      When will there be enough evidence before we call it proof?
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      MIB
      MIB
      8
    2. 2
      Backdoc
      Backdoc
      7
    3. 3
      norseman
      norseman
      5
    4. 4
      Incorrigible1
      Incorrigible1
      4
    5. 5
      xspider1
      xspider1
      4
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      1,554
    • Most Online
      2,678

    Iambrianne
    Newest Member
    Iambrianne
    Joined
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      91.3k
    • Total Posts
      995.6k
×
×
  • Create New...