Jump to content
  1. Bigfoot Discussion

    1. 203.6k
      posts
    2. In the Field

      Discussion on how to conduct oneself in the field - equipment to use, how to gather evidence etc.

      20.6k
      posts
    3. News Articles

      This section automatically collects news feeds with the words bigfoot, sasquatch and yeti in them - as such, some articles about people with big feet and monster trucks are bound to get through, so try and sort the wheat from the chaff.

      18.1k
      posts
    4. Film/Video/Photos/Audio

      A place to discuss film, video, audio & photographs of alleged bigfoot.

      129.4k
      posts
      • OldMort
    5. 20.6k
      posts
      • Abqnurse
    6. SSR Stats and Analysis

      Standardized Sighting Record Database

      384
      posts
      • bipedalist
    7. Tirademan's Historical Newspaper Archives

      Our long time member Tirademan (R.I.P. Scott McClean) compiled this extensive archive of Sasquatch related newspaper articles and donated it to the BFF before his passing. The earliest articles in this collection are from 1818 in Florida, 1877 (Australia), 1884 (Canada) and 1764 (Europe).

      327
      posts
    8. 10.5k
      posts
    9. Conferences, Symposiums & Other Get-Togethers

      Announce or discuss conferences here.

      1k
      posts
    10. Hunting and Fishing Forum

      Show us your trophies!

      17
      posts
  2. Welcome to The Bigfoot Forums

    1. New Members - Start Here

      All New Members or Members with Zero Posts, please start here

      3.2k
      posts
    2. 3
      posts
    3. 11
      posts
  3. BFF Library

    1. Relict Hominoid Inquiry: Research Papers

      Dr. Jeff Meldrum's  Relict Hominoid Inquiry at Idaho State University

      56
      posts
    2. Relict Hominoid Inquiry: Articles, Book Reviews, Essays

      Dr. Jeff Meldrum's  RHI at Idaho State University

      29
      posts
    3. Research Papers, Books, Articles

      This section contains papers from researchers not affiliated with RHI.

      70
      posts
    4. 25
      posts
      • Catmandoo
    5. 983
      posts
    6. 74
      posts
  4. The Tar Pit

    1. Politics, Current Events

      Politics, Current Events, History

      86.9k
      posts
      • norseman
    2. Lifestyles, Humor

      Jokes, Perspectives on Life, Miscellaneous

      25.4k
      posts
      • norseman
    3. Sports and Entertainment

      Sports and the failure of the Dallas Cowboys

      903
      posts
      • VAfooter
  • BFF Registration

    Join the BFF now!

  • Who was online

      • Incorrigible1
      • BC witness
      • MikeZimmer
      • norseman
      • Nellie
      • 17x7
      • MIB
      • Snoho
      • BlackRockBigfoot
      • OldMort
      • Babar1296
      • xspider1
      • FieldAnomaly
      • Huntster
  • Latest Posts

    • norseman
      GO TAKE A BIOLOGY CLASS! You’re talking out your donkey….   Type Specimens 1) Holotype (Species anchor) 2) Allotype (The opposite sex of the Holotype) 3) Paratypes (extra specimens of the same species) 4) Syntypes (when no Holotype was chosen by error)   Nothing I have told you is some personal version. It’s what I have read and what I have asked from scientists. If you would like to educate yourself in basic biology and discuss? I will be right here!   As far as majestic? Yah I think Bigfoot absolutely belongs with Elephants, Giraffes and Mountain Gorillas with their own scientific classification.   They DO NOT belong with Pixies, Gnomes and Hobgoblins in the mythological section at Barnes and Noble.🤷‍♂️
    • xspider1
      I'm talking in circles??  That's ripe.     One minute you say it doesn't matter as long as Science gets a complete male and a complete female Sasquatch, then you say Science just needs a type specimen?  Again, a type specimen can be (and often is) a body part recovered post-mortem.  Only your personal version of Science requires two complete Sasquatch skeletons. "As far as semantics? I guess I have a Bigfoot hypothesis then…..no feelings anywhere."  That takes the cake because 1.) you are trying to reduce Science to semantics which is basically the opposite, and  2.) no feelings anywhere?  geez   Why is it always Bigfoot ripping my arms off?  I'm not advocating hunting down a potentially breeding pair, you are.   "You on the other hand LOTS OF FEELINGS when it comes to killing “majestic animals” in the name of science!"  Correct.  When you quote "majestic animals" do you feel as though Bigfoot are not majestic?  They're just another every day 10 foot tall human-like Ape I guess..  No big deal.
    • norseman
      Correct. So according to you? I am “villainizing” all these animals. So that science is justified in taking a type specimen.🙄   The point is? Is you talk in circles until your asking me what point I AM trying to make……🤷‍♂️   The point I made back aways is that Bigfoot may rip your arms off and beat you with them. That obviously hit a nerve with you. But now you say every animal on the planet does it. Including spiders and squirrels….. Ok?   As far as semantics? I guess I have a Bigfoot hypothesis then…..no feelings anywhere.   You on the other hand LOTS OF FEELINGS when it comes to killing “majestic animals” in the name of science!😭   11.6 million specimens….. Are you gonna start a petition or something? 
    • xspider1
      "If you’re trying to kill one? Yah I think they could be very lethal to a human."  Same with a chimp, same with a dog, same with a Black Widow, what point are you trying to make?  If you attack a squirrel and it can't get away, it will try to kill you. 'Science makes assumptions all the time. Its called a hypothesis."  Nope.  'An assumption is a belief or idea that is taken for granted without sufficient evidence or proof.  Unlike a hypothesis, an assumption is not testable or falsifiable.' Look it up if you don't believe me.  You are correct that Science does not care about my feelings and, likewise, it does not care about your feelings either.  Science does care about strict adherence to Scientific Methods which, although they may change, do not at any time permit personal interpretations.  Have a great night.  8^)  
    • norseman
      They are impressive.   I watched one digging for Rock Chucks. He was moving some material with that big rippling hump.
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      norseman
      norseman
      9
    2. 2
      Huntster
      Huntster
      8
    3. 3
      VAfooter
      VAfooter
      6
    4. 4
      Backdoc
      Backdoc
      6
    5. 5
      xspider1
      xspider1
      5
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      1,560
    • Most Online
      2,678

    Cody Poston
    Newest Member
    Cody Poston
    Joined
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      91.7k
    • Total Posts
      996.2k
×
×
  • Create New...