Forums
-
Bigfoot Discussion
-
- 203.6k
- posts
-
- Bigfoot myth or monster?
- By Huntster,
-
- 20.6k
- posts
-
- By BFFbot,
-
- 18.2k
- posts
-
- 129.4k
- posts
-
- By Bonehead74,
-
- 20.6k
- posts
-
- By Abqnurse,
-
- 384
- posts
-
- By bipedalist,
-
- 322
- posts
-
- Idaho 1902 - Idaho's Wild Man
- By Trogluddite,
-
- 10.5k
- posts
-
- SC EP:1291 The Skookum Thermal
- By BFFbot,
-
- 1k
- posts
-
- Blue Ridge Bigfoot Fest - September 26, 2026
- By OkieFoot,
-
- 17
- posts
-
-
Welcome to The Bigfoot Forums
-
- 3.2k
- posts
-
- New Member Introductions
- By PepsReview,
-
- 3
- posts
-
- Community Rules and Guidelines
- By gigantor,
-
- 11
- posts
-
- Welcome Our New Director!
- By joebeelart,
-
-
BFF Library
-
- 56
- posts
-
- 29
- posts
-
- Not a Yeti? John Napier, Lawrence Swan, And The Footprint That Made Shipton Famous
- By Patterson-Gimlin,
-
- 70
- posts
-
- 25
- posts
-
- By Catmandoo,
-
- 979
- posts
-
- Oregon 1977 - Bigfoot Research Inspires Childhood Literacy
- By Trogluddite,
-
- 74
- posts
-
-
The Tar Pit
-
- 87k
- posts
-
- By VAfooter,
-
- 25.4k
- posts
-
- By norseman,
-
- 903
- posts
-
- By VAfooter,
-
-
Who was online
- NotPawPrints
- xspider1
- norseman
- Incorrigible1
- DrPSH
- LocalGayCryptid
- Josh1990
- OldMort
- krock316
- FieldAnomaly
- VAfooter
- BlackRockBigfoot
- Trogluddite
- BC witness
- Sting
- NormalJake
- BeachFoot
- JKH
- Littlewing
-
Latest Posts
-
By Huntster · Posted
If government will go to these lengths to protect certain trees (especially just maintaining the secrecy/remoteness strategies), would they do likewise to protect a rare human sub-species? I think so............ -
By norseman · Posted
I don't even insist on one. But I don't write the rules. But once discovery happens I would be for the most rigid protection for the species. Harming one would be a hanging offense in my book. -
By Huntster · Posted
I've become a wuss. I don't even want to eat bear anymore. A friend gave me some bear sausage the other day, and it was gross. I'm spoiled, even with high meat prices. I've got the money now. Attach enough money to it, and they'll fall all over themselves to prove it. -
By xspider1 · Posted
Never mind. It occurs to me now that a captured Bigfoot would probably never be released. And, if a pair is required for classification, omg, what if they have 'kids' out there... : / I guess I don't want to be any part of the 'required proof'. Maybe I will see them in the woods someday (preferably with a few friends and some big guns (for protection only), just in case they attack. My 99.9% belief might then be confirmed and maybe we could sit around the camp-fire later with the Bigfeet and all sing Kumbaya. -
By xspider1 · Posted
Yep. I would probably eat it if I had to. It's legal to eat road-kill here although, I usually just go to the store. Although, with the cuts in food-safety (including a 19% reduction to the FDA work-force) a squished squirrel or, a drowned rat doesn't sound too bad right now.. "No doubt, but Norse is correct that Science as an industry will simply not play ball until somebody delivers a carcass and essentially rubs their noses in it." I agree that Universities, most private companies, governments, etc. are not going to really get involved until Joe six-pack, wife and kids are convinced that they exist. 'Science' is often done by people who are unencumbered by those institutions. I don't know the best way to prove Bigfoot. I think one (or two, if Norse insists ) could be captured alive. I mean if we can capture elephants and whale sharks?? 🤷🏻♂️
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
VAfooter
6 -
2
Huntster
5 -
3
Backdoc
4 -
4
norseman
3 -
5
georgerm
3
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Total Members1,563
-
Most Online2,678
Newest Member
NotPawPrints
Joined -
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics92k
-
Total Posts996.6k
-