All Activity

Yes, stream pathways that branch off are harder to access and have restrictions but I think equally important is the overwhelming record of sasquatch doing this activity at night. This reduces exposure and therefore sightings, what few are by the river are majority at night by campers or night fisherman on reservations. I do have several dusk vocalization events close to salmon pathways at dawn and dusk and one very up close sighting ( 20 feet under a high powered flashlight ) in the parking lot of salmon fishing area.

Read this section from the regulations, especially the highlighted part. Do you know anything at all about salmon .. salmon fishing, etc? The places most people fish for salmon are main stem rivers, water 5 feet to 30 feet deep, and often a couple hundred yards wide. As shown above we are not allowed to fish for them in the kinds of places a sasquatch might attempt to catch them .. the spawning areas. The bulk of those are in places quite inaccessible to humans. Not impossible, but difficult, and it is highly improbable that an average urban person is going there. There isn't the overlap between humans and salmon vulnerable to bigfoot predation that you seem to assume there is. The literature says they DO eat salmon. Consider the Olympic Project "nests" area. Little finger ridges in horribly dense huckleberry brush over spawning streams. Same thing occurs in the northern Oregon coast range based on reports I've taken and also in the mid and south coast areas. Or consider what David Paulides reports learning from the lower Klamath River tribal people regarding "things" stealing salmon from their nets at night.

You’re hard to pin down. But since we have established that Bigfoot doesn’t need to leave the forest to forage or graze it you like? They have 25 million acres to do it in, just in Washington and Oregon alone. And that’s not counting state land or timber company property. Just National Forest. Also we do have reports of them seen fishing. But salmon runs in the PAC NW are not what they used to be. Grand Coulee dam alone wiped out a large swath of salmon bearing streams and rivers. https://alaskabeacon.com/2025/08/19/salmon-extinction-in-motion-in-washingtons-and-oregons-snake-river/

I happen to know where that pic was taken. It (and other such waterfalls along the Alaska coast) are almost all now within either national parks or other classified areas with human behavior restrictions because brown bears congregate there. There are a few in southeast Alaska like that where black bears congregate, too, but mostly under the cover of thick vegetation. There are lots of rivers and creeks where bears fish. They might not do so in congregations like McNeil River or Brooks Camp, but they're there. One rarely sees them because they'll come out at night when we go to bed. I'm thankful for that. I let them have the night. I think sasquatches have creeks where they like to fish, but they're almost assuredly in locations devoid of man. I think they know the dangers of mankind, and their priority is to avoid us. They do so even better than the bears.

Published in the Oakland (CA) Tribune on January 05, 1936 and mentioned in the Forums at least once. However, the sighting is mistakenly dated to 1936 (the year of the newspaper article) when, in fact, it occurred in 1886.

‘Bigfoot Took Her’ Review: When Sasquatch Was the Suspect The Wall Street JournalView the full article

‘Bigfoot Took Her’ Review: When Sasquatch Was the Suspect The Wall Street JournalView the full article

‘Bigfoot Took Her’ Review: When Sasquatch Was the Suspect The Wall Street JournalView the full article

‘Bigfoot Took Her’ Review: When Sasquatch Was the Suspect The Wall Street JournalView the full article

‘Bigfoot Took Her’ Review: When Sasquatch Was the Suspect The Wall Street JournalView the full article

‘Bigfoot Took Her’ Review: When Sasquatch Was the Suspect The Wall Street JournalView the full article

‘Bigfoot Took Her’ Review: When Sasquatch Was the Suspect The Wall Street JournalView the full article

‘Bigfoot Took Her’ Review: When Sasquatch Was the Suspect The Wall Street JournalView the full article

‘Bigfoot Took Her’ Review: When Sasquatch Was the Suspect The Wall Street JournalView the full article

‘Bigfoot Took Her’ Review: When Sasquatch Was the Suspect The Wall Street JournalView the full article

‘Bigfoot Took Her’ Review: When Sasquatch Was the Suspect The Wall Street JournalView the full article

‘Bigfoot Took Her’ Review: When Sasquatch Was the Suspect The Wall Street JournalView the full article

‘Bigfoot Took Her’ Review: When Sasquatch Was the Suspect The Wall Street JournalView the full article

‘Bigfoot Took Her’ Review: When Sasquatch Was the Suspect The Wall Street JournalView the full article

‘Bigfoot Took Her’ Review: When Sasquatch Was the Suspect The Wall Street JournalView the full article

‘Bigfoot Took Her’ Review: When Sasquatch Was the Suspect The Wall Street JournalView the full article

‘Bigfoot Took Her’ Review: When Sasquatch Was the Suspect The Wall Street JournalView the full article

Trick-or-treaters search for candy and Bigfoot this Halloween Monroe Evening NewsView the full article

Not really. I talked about the need to "graze" based on the limited diet would increase the need for Bigfoot to expand its food search area as a practical matter. Any time where Bigfoots needs can't be met locally it would force bigfoot to be on the move until its needs can be met. We don't know the specifics of those needs. "Grazing" as a concept means the active searching or Movement for food esp. plant foods. This doesn't mean we are talking about cows eating grass out in the open field in Nebraska. It's conceptual. It's simply a matter of degree. If we want to say Bigfoot eats fish (and I imagine they do) I do have to wonder, why they are not spotted around salmon streams on a regular basis. Other than small numbers of bigfoot in existence, I can't think of any other major reason. There are plenty of food available for the taking. Stuff grows IN the Forrest for anyone who hasn't been made aware. Since most issues of Bigfoot are conceptual (since we don't have a body on a slab to study) BFF postings on the issues are meant to be conceptual. If what Bigfoot needs is close by, bigfoot is likely to stay close by. If not, Bigfoot would have to be on the move. If Bigfoot's has a very limited diet, Bigfoot has fewer options to fulfill that diet. If Bigfoots diet is more flexible it should be easier to meet it's food needs. It's well and good if there are berries and mushrooms available. This assumes Bigfoot would eat them and can eat them. If not, it's useless to the direct needs of bigfoot.