All Activity

This is the theory I heard. Mammoths knocked down trees and expand grasslands.

You just lost any credibility During the Cretaceous Period (145–66 million years ago), the Great Plains were covered by a shallow inland sea called the Western Interior Seaway. However, during the Late Cretaceous to the Paleocene (65–55 million years ago), the seaway had begun to recede, leaving behind thick marine deposits and a relatively flat terrain which the seaway had once occupied.[26] During the Cenozoic era, specifically about 25 million years ago during the Miocene and Pliocene epochs, the continental climate became favorable to the evolution of grasslands. Existing forest biomes declined and grasslands became much more widespread.

The Earth is not fragile and It has nothing to do with Trump, science says forest management….lots of forest management is good for the environment. The modern environmental movement is about making a quick buck. One man’s environmental damage is another man’s progress for human kind.

I doubt that completely. The vast majority of fires during that time was caused by lightning, humans couldn’t stop any fire. Humans causing one or hundreds of fires wouldn’t create millions of acres grasslands to form. Im not really sure where you’re going with this. Timber management is good, needed and probably would help the bigfeet since it would create cover and food. I doubt they would even notice though.

Human civilization was built on metal, wood, food, stone, etc... Capitalism isnt perfect, but there is nothing even remotely comparable. And Modern logging is a sustainable future. I dont want every stick taken out of the woods either.

Colorado Woman Reports Bigfoot Sighting | 570 WSYR | Coast to Coast AM with George Noory 570 WSYRView the full article

Colorado Woman Reports Bigfoot Sighting | NewsRadio WFLA | Coast to Coast AM with George Noory NewsRadio WFLAView the full article

Colorado Woman Reports Bigfoot Sighting iHeartView the full article

the Great Plains stretch over the states you mention, but your claim of human's creating fires, burning down forests, so now we have the Great Plains is absurd.

Do you guys know the story behind the largest and heaviest man made land object? it was called the Captain. Also known as Marion 6360. it weighed 30 million pounds. A hydraulic line burst and caught the whole thing on fire. the companies response? the buried the freaking machine underground and left a huge poison pill in the Earth. point being companies can and have (historically) have had little care for long lasting Environmental damage in the name of making a quick buck. and im a gun toting 3x Trump voter thats anti EV that drives a Ford with a 7.3 liter Gas v8, but i'm not gonna side with the Trump administration on every. single. issue

yes. It wouldn't be the first time humans didnt exploit natural resources and rape the land in the name of profit I'm talking about kansas up to north dakota. There isnt jack #4%^ when compared to the woods of the west.

literally posting "it looks good on paper" stats is fine, but theres a lot of assumptions being made about the infinitesimal stats of the timber thats going to be felled.

1. so you are concerned about an unknown future, which falls outside of any plans anyone actually has? so, the boogie man? 2. the reason that there aren't forests in the midwest (there are plenty of forests in the midwest) is 100% most certainly not because of humans burning them to the ground for hunting. this is insane and makes me question your reading comprehension abilities.

These are also... claims. Yes, I agree if everything being said is true than its fine but i'd be curious to see the actual result in the years to come, and thats what i'm concerned about. I know the 112 million acres doesnt automatically mean 112 million acres are going to be felled but the actual end result is what im talking about. its a theory but the reason we dont have forests in the midwest (such as kansas) is because thousands of years ago humans burned everything to the ground to drive animals out of the woods to be hunted..

We’ve seen a number of DNA campaigns run from various researchers and institutions. And I certainly agree this area should be the top priority in the search. We also have Meldrun doing a lot of work on the footprint and locomotion front. But what other areas could scientists and researchers really take a more in depth deep dive? I know infrasonics has been a large area of interest, but has anyone performed any large scale studies? I know it’s a pretty difficult undertaking with the costs and equipment, but there could be some invaluable data to be collected if the infrasonic theory proves to be accurate. To stay similarly in line with infrasound, have there been any deep dive vocalization studies? I know whoops and howls are a popular thing with field researchers, but have any primate vocalization experts spent any amount of time thoroughly researching? What other areas could we attempt in depth research into that could, if nothing else, provide us a means of getting closer to obtaining the much needed dna sample?

You make a good point. We all would like the Bigfoot topic to get the serious consideration and resources we feel it deserves. Yet, I would like to offer up this idea: PT Barnum (or someone like him) stated, "I don't care what they keep saying about me so long as they spell my name right" The idea is any press is good press. I don't see anything demeaning about a Messin' with Sasquatch commercial. In a way I think the more Bigfoot air fresheners in cars or mudflaps and beef jerky commercials put Bigfoot in the mind of the public. I see that as a good thing. This is having fun with the topic which I think softens the topic for the public. Attempting serious academic study of Bigfoot could be met with ridicule. Such serious people are lumped in with those people looking for unicorns. If a person claim they saw Bigfoot they probably don't have time to whip out their call phone This leaves them with a choice: Tell others what you saw or keep quit. As Gimlin found out, even having a film of a reported bigfoot is not enough to shied you from harassment and ridicule. If I saw what I thought was bigfoot in the woods, I might not tell anybody. Shows like Discovery and so on have done a decent job giving serious study to the Bigfoot concept. Really good shows have featured the kind of experts we want to present. These are people like Munns, Meldrum, john Bindernagal, Anna Nikaris, and so on. These people are a good face for the serious study of Bigfoot. Where we miss are shows like Finding Bigfoot where the bigfoot topic unintentionally becomes a joke. You have people talking about bigfoot like he exists as a proven. They brag about all these things they attribute as fact right down to bigfoot's diet, bigfoot's favorite color, and bigfoot's favorite baseball team. When you have Bobo running around saying every twig snap is a 'squatch' all the previous well- built credibility is lost. You can't underestimate the damage this has created. Anyone doing a serious study of Bigfoot is lumped in with the face of Bigfoot. That face is Bobo. For me, finding bigfoot has done more to harm the subject of bigfoot second only to Bob Heironimus unchallenged claims

Thanks for that. Definitely sounds as if it could be our quarry! Nice catch. Almost as if they were annoyed you put recorders on their turf.

Cut it into 1000s of fondue steaks and send it to every biology lab in the nation.🤷🏻‍♂️ I wont break our forum rules and go into detail, but the alleged reason that UFOs wont be disclosed is because of religious beliefs. Dunno.

This is a volume enhanced 2 to 3 minute .wav file from the original .mp3 file which was 2 hours long. This is just about the same size as the audio used in the video. Hope this helps. treefall.WAV

The spikes in the spectrogram, where I put the arrow, wondering if you could link that section of audio for more context.

I agree with you. The government knows. Why keep this from the people? There is something profound enough to merit the secrecy. Finding a body won't change the decision to keep it a secret. It will only lead to an aggressive cover up effort. How could you release it without being stopped by the government? Youtube? You'll be called a hoaxer. Sending the DNA to someone? They will be silenced and discredited. Sending it to a university? Their funding and grants will be threatened. How can you overcome the machine that is designed to control the info? Not saying its impossible, but it will require an in depth, multi threaded plan.

With their capabilities? SOMEONE in the government knows something I would wager. If you follow UFO’s? Many organizations have simply given up on disclosure and are now attempting to detect and possibly retrieve materials associated with UFOs first. If the Government acts aggressively when they claim nothing is there? It makes everyone stand up and take notice.

As someone in this industry, I agree fully and you’ve explained it perfectly. Another excellent post, lots of common sense on this board!!!

In my view, that is equally important.

Forests like everything else need to be managed. Letting nature take its course….has its effects!