All Activity

DNA Q: It seems when they test for DNA they already know what a Black Bear, Wolverine, or Bobcat's DNA looks like. In this way I would think it is easy to look it up in comparison on a sample vs known DNA. After a lighting fast check the match would be in the Database. That might not be the exact way it works but essentially it has to work somewhat that way. What happens in the event of the DNA of an unknown animal? Clearly I am talking about Bigfoot. Say they have scat, hair, blood, or whatever from a Bigfoot. They test it. There is not Bigfoot in the database. Result? Animal A is known to exist Animal A is in the data base. Animal A leaves traces at a camp site. The sample is tested. "Hey guys, the sample is Animal A" Animal Z is unknown to exist Animal Z is not in the data base. The Sample left by Animal Z is tested. What is the result at the lab? What does that tell us?

I don't know if "da gub'ment" allows Sasquatch to "harvest" people in National Forests....but I would certainly allow for the possibility that DotGov is aware of incidents where humans have been taken and possibly consumed in the same way that any other predator would if presented with an opportunity for an easy chunk of toothless, clawless, slow moving protein and for economic and political reasons keeps it quiet. Then the question of WHY? I have a theory that as the logging, outdoor, tourist, and camping (equipment) business is nearly a TRILLION dollar per year business and all the tax revenue FROM those businesses TO the government would be in the area of $300 BILLION. Roll that into all the special interests, lobbyists, and money flowing into the coffers of politicians, then there's one hell of a motive for silence on the part of DotGov and the politicians who benefit. Look at the timber industry....if Sasquatch was undeniably proven to exist...body, live capture, roadkill...whatever, the ensuing protection of the species in prime timber areas would halt that industry and cost billions alone. So, there's another billion or so reasons why a lid would be kept on the whole subject as far as DotGov is concerned. "Oh no, nothing to see here, pay no attention to the hairy biped behind the tree". Why would a National Park be a "center of exploitation" for the Sasquatch? Guns and hunting are generally prohibited in National Parks and I am convinced that they are well aware of what a gun or a bow can do EVEN if they have no cognitive ability on par with a great ape, just by seeing a BOOM stick drop a deer they would accrue a fear of guns or bows....I know plenty of dogs, horses, and even coyote that are scared to death of guns and they are not on par with a primate or relict hominid. So...easy pickins in the National Parks. Let me just sum up my personal opinion with "Hell, I wouldn't be the least little bit surprised" at anything DotGov would do.

https://sites.google.com/site/noxgigasstudy/zana-and-the-black-plague

Publication information is in the clipping. This Associated Press article is also on Bobbie Short's (RIP) Bigfoot Encounters website under "Hoaxes." Not because the driver or passengers were pulling a hoax, but because 3 people came forward claiming to have pulled off the hoax. It is hard to see how a bus driver - himself 6' 2" tall - would confuse the 5' 11" hoaxer who claimed to be wearing the suit for a 7-foot tall smelly ape.

What happens when two hunters head into the Arkansas wilderness expecting a peaceful night under the stars — and instead feel the breath of something massive just outside their tent? In this terrifying episode, we hear from Joe, a long-time outdoorsman whose solo trips through Arkansas and Idaho took a turn for the inexplicable. From a silent, towering presence that shook him to the core, to a green tree branch ripped six feet high in the Idaho backcountry, Joe’s stories are chilling, detailed, and unforgettable. You’ll hear about stone markers, guttural breathing that rattled his chest, and an overwhelming silence that made even the raccoons stay away. Locations include the Ozarks of Arkansas, Snake River near Palisades Reservoir, and the eerie woods of South Missouri. If you think Bigfoot is just a campfire story — this episode will change your mind. 🗣️ Share Your Story Had a Bigfoot encounter or strange experience? Send it to bigfootsociety@gmail.com – your story might be featured on the show! 🎥 Watch & Subscribe on YouTube 🔴 Subscribe here → Bigfoot Society YouTube 💬 Leave a comment & let us know your thoughts! 📞 Leave a voicemail with your story → Speakpipe (Use multiple voicemails if needed) 👥 Share this episode → Watch & Share 🎧 More episodes → Podcast Playlist 🌲 Recommended: New Jersey Bigfoot Encounters 💥 Support the Show & Get Perks ✅ Join the community on Supercast – Become a Member ✅ Listen ad-free & early on YouTube – Join Here 📱 Let’s Connect Instagram: @bigfootsocietyTwitter: @bigfoot_societyTikTok: @bigfoot.society🧰 Tools & Partners I Use (Affiliate Links) These help support the show at no extra cost to you: Beam (Better Sleep): Try BeamWildgrain (Better Bread): Join HereSeed (Probiotics): Get SeedMedi-Share (Healthcare): Learn MoreLMNT (Electrolytes) Free Sample Pack with your first purchase! : Get LMNTOrganic and non-GMO groceries delivered for less http://thrv.me/uarEhS🎙️ Podcasting Tools: Repurpose.io: Try ItDescript: Sign UpStreamyard: Start RecordingRiverside.fm: Try Riverside🎧 My Audio Interface: View on Amazon ☕ Buy Me a Coffee – Support Here 🛍️ Grab Some Merch – Shop on Etsy 📬 Mailing Address: Bigfoot Society 125 E 1st St. #233 Earlham, IA 50072 📧 Business Inquiries: bigfootsociety@gmail.com Listen to the Podcast

In this "classic" episode from August of 2023, Cliff Barackman speaks with researcher and filmmaker Stephen Major about the Port Chatham Hairy Man! Alaska's Port Chatham was supposedly abandoned after a series of aggresive sasquatch encounters, and Stephen set out to investigate the legends! Visit Stephen's website and watch his films HERE. Start your free online visit with Hims today at http://hims.com/beyond Sign up for our weekly bonus podcast "Beyond Bigfoot & Beyond" and ad-free episodes! Get your official "Bigfoot & Beyond: Enter The Sasquatch" shirt!Listen to the Podcast

Show me a picture of her.

Zana.

Greetings everybody, and thanks for being here. I am excited to become a member of this community. I guess I've always had an interest in Cryptids. I just never devoted much time to thinking about it... You know, life gets in the way of all the really cool stuff sometimes. After getting very sick with Covid-19, I began listening to podcasts to escape from the mainstream news, and I have totally gone down the rabbit hole. I love photography and, as I am starting to replace my old, early digital equipment, I would like to acquire gear that will give me the best chance of getting the best possible images, should I ever get lucky enough to have a sighting. I live in Eastern NC, but hope to travel to the mountains of the western side of the state more and more. I am looking forward to diving in and enjoying all of your information, ideas.

Its NOT a Homo Sapien Sapiens….. I don't know of any woman on the face of the earth that looks like Patty. Or a woman that roams the wilderness naked in winter. So science needs two type specimens of every extant species on Earth. One male and one female. Full stop and no exceptions. Not even for archaic cryptid ape men. If thats not your goal to prove anything to anyone. Good for you. But don't muddy the waters by proclaiming that it’s “probably illegal”. Its probably many things…. but it’s DEFINITELY the largest discovery to science in the last decade. And undeniable proof is the only way you can get there.

Keeping evidence is stupid especially if it's probably an illegal act. " she kept the dress!?!?"~ bill Clinton I've taken photos of illegal doings and someday they will likely bite someone on the seat meat. Don't pose with dead protected animals, people outside of war zones , ...bring a hand or something only to have the DNA show human enough that you're screwed?? Nope.

I understand. A good 1911 trigger can't be beat. I just can't carry cocked and locked anymore. It would be fine for spending the night in a bomb crater with infiltrators expected in the dark, or even as a tent gun, but I can't carry such a weapon unless I'm walking into trouble................and I'm not going to do that, so.............. A smooth & tune trigger job on a Glock helps immensely, and it's easy to do. https://www.pewpewtactical.com/glock-25-cent-trigger-job/

‘Being Watched’: Bigfoot Evidence Claimed In Willamette National Forest OutKickView the full article

A UPI wire story published in the Nashua (NH) Telegraph on November 21, 1975.

I just cannot do squishy triggers. A 1911 to me is just so crisp and clean. Feels the best in the hand too. And looks amazing. And with a Rowland kit? Pretty serious four legged medicine. Besides if I cannot get it done in 10 shots? I still have a heavy bludgeoning tool in my hands!🤣

Nice forum pic, welcome to the conversation. We have a load of folks here such as myself that enjoy geeking out over this kind of stuff.

I do now as well since 2013. But Norse has done a good job of infecting me with the 460 Rowland bug. I was awaiting the return of a stolen Glock 21 from California, but got tired of the political stalling, so bought another, and I just ordered the conversion kit. The tritium sights and extended slide release just arrived, and I'll be doing the trigger smooth & tune in November. I've got a box of Underwood 255 grain hard cast flat nose and a box of Buffalo Bore 230 grain FMJ-FN for testing through the chronograph. I prefer the higher velocity of the FMJ-FN bullets, but can't seem to find them for reloading. Just the hard casts. The muzzle break makes the pistol too long for carrying around, but it's the perfect tent gun when bumps occur at night................on in a holster mounted to the snowmobile or Argo..............

I've already come to believe it, and I'm rather happy about it. I just hope I don't run afoul of one while in the outdoors and have to shoot it. But after a long life of outdoors activities in this region, and having found almost zero convincing evidence here, that isn't much of a threat. I've had LOTS of close interactions with black and brown bears and wolves, and have seen plenty of sign of all three, but almost no sasquatch sign. Just one instance of strange knocking in a location I later learned has a reputation with the local natives.

Yes, I think there were archaic human species that reached the New World, too. Here is possibly an archaic human footprint from Kansas: https://faculty.ucr.edu/~legneref/kansas/kansas.htm Although it could be faked from the similar looking Burtele foot which was discovered the same year as this foot print pictures were uploaded to the website. And here is well documented site of potentially archaic humans in Hueyatlaco, Mexico:

Agreed, along with numerous other negative interactions. But, along the positive side, there are the Dian Fosseys and Jane Goodalls out there who would habituate with the sasquatches in order to learn about them in the right way. Indeed, that might have already occurred................or is occurring now. I note the approach taken by the Olympic Project, which I'm very happy with. Moreover, it is supposedly on private lands, which allows research without government interference. There are other researchers out there conducting similar research on public lands, and with government behaving from a position of ignorance, as long as no harvest occurs, no foul. And who cares if Joe Blow in downtown Dallas doesn't know about it?

Hello from North Carolina. I have interest in archaic humans species, and thought people on big-foot forum may have share my interest in archaic humans. Here is videos of potentially archaic human site from New World:

Ford, Chevy, Dodge. I carry my Glock 20 in 10mm when I'm out in the boonies. I carried a Glock of one stripe or another with holes in the end ranging from 9mm to 40 to 45 during my police career, so I trust it completely. I used to carry my beloved Smith & Wesson 44Mag Mountain Gun, but I like the lighter weight and higher capacity of the Glock...plus, fifteen plus one in it and a pair of spares on my hip is a lot of bad medicine for bad critters (most likely 2 legged human variety). I'm not going to pee on another feller's choice of sidearm as long as they are safe enough with it to avoid shooting ME in the foot. If you like what you carry and you train and practice enough to be competent....carry an old cap & ball Navy 36 if you want to.

I'm pretty egalitarian in my choice of knives. I carry the same Camillus 6" Hunter I have had since I was 12 for a fixed blade. It holds a razor edge, has a full tang, and I figure I have known that knife for 45 years, skinned a lot of game with it, used it to baton a lot of kindling, and even lance a boil on my best friend's butt one time in Montana...I don't see a need to change. For a folder, I carry a 4.2" Spyderco that I carried for the last 15 years I was a cop, and a little two blade Victorinox Swiss Army knife and that's mostly for the tweezers and the toothpick.

The photographer, Russ Kinne, was a long-experienced technical/aerial/travel photographer affiliated with, not employed by, the Smithsonian Institute. He was still alive and living in Maine in 2020 according to the Brown Alumni Magazine website. I wonder if Dr. Meldrum would agree with Kinne's estimate of the Bigfoot bone structure. There was no story, just this photo published in the Nashua (NH) Telegraph on January 16, 1974.

We can make a list of those who were thought to be heretics only to be proven right. The list would be long. If Bigfoot was proven 100% to the science, what would the impact be on Jeff Meldrum's legacy in the eyes of science. I cannot think of a person in the pure sciences more connected to bigfoot than Jeff Meldrum. Grover Kranz is more of an old school connection in the eyes of science PhD's known mostly only by old dudes like me. Meldrum has been the science face of Bigfoot for decades. If Bigfoot was ever proven to that level, I really think Meldrum would be looked at as a revolutionary. Maybe he would be viewed at the level of the wright brothers. What would Meldrum's legacy be if Bigfoot was proven? A) He would be looked at as the one guy who got it right. They name a museum after him. A modern Wright Brothers. B) He would be viewed positively but beyond that he would be passed over by the establishment coopting his ideas. He would have 2 minutes devoted to him on an hour-long Bigfoot PowerPoint lecture. C) He would be viewed as a gullible scientist who happen to get it right but was still viewed in an unfordable light. D) Jeff Who? I think science is pretty ethical. In this way, the answer is A Could there be some jealously from some enemies of Meldrum now having egg on their face. Sure. I still say science as a whole would be on his side. ANSWER: A