All Activity

If science can exhume a skull and look at the skull and decide where all the muscle attachment points are? And then recreate the face, the lips, the eyes, the nose and the mouth with precision? Then they can look at a living creature and reverse engineer its skeleton. Muscle and bone and how they interact is a two way street. There is nothing “Giganto” about it. It’s Patty. So be it.

Thank you. Great explanation

Sure, its trolling, but its not AI. Most likely a statue or a person in a suit.

Copied the image, dragged it into this site, and it said that they are quite confident that no AI was used to generate the image. However, the "creature" doesn't look that tall compared to other object in the photo and as noted above, the "gee, do you like my sunset picture" without mentioning the Bigfoot in the room is disingenuous trolling.

Apparently, this hermit/wild man was in the Mattituck area for some time. From the Pittsburgh (PA) Post-Gazette of November 21, 1891, a full three years before the prior report.

Published in the Pittsburgh (PA) Post-Gazette on December 21, 1919. Ryerson Station is now a 1,164-acre park in the southwestern corner of Pennsylvania, near the West Virginia border. This report, in conjunction with some more I'll be posting soon, may be an example of "the halibut effect." This is discussed on the Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization website and I'm sure its mentioned somewhere in the Forums as well. Essentially, man's impact on the environment (through logging or building, e.g.) can drive out wildlife but when the environment recovers (forests regrow, farms are abandoned), the wildlife that fits that environment returns.

Personally, I think a return to film rather than digital (when it's still possible to GET film) for video and stills would be a step forward for researchers who used them as an adjunct to digital media when possible. Then again, I am a lousy photographer no matter what medium I would use....

I enjoy Chuke's work, as well as STM and Aleks Petakov. I like Eli too. I appreciate the way they don't sensationalize every single noise and always look for alternate explanations and "What is more likely". The work they've done at the cabin at Area A has been some good content.

A baseball playing Bigfoot? Sign him up. For now, I've lost the publication information on this story. I will note that an "escaped gorilla" scare was ongoing in this area of western Pennsylvania at the time, so the idea of hoaxers taking advantage of recent sightings is not out of the ordinary.

NOTE: Some of the language in this article, published on August 13, 1845 in the (Harrisburg) Pennsylvania Weekly Telegraph may offend modern readers. Publishing this old report of a possible Bigfoot does not represent an endorsement of the language used 180 years ago.

I think we are agreeing just in different language. As far as Standing goes....yes, I absolutely believe he faked the "Muppet Videos" as you call them (brilliant name by the way) especially. If I had to put a BS Meter to anything Standing has claimed as real since the video of the alleged creature running up the side of the cliff which if ANYONE other than Standing had introduced I wouldn't suspect it. The one with the black forehead....I allow for the possibility it is genuine, not the probability. As for the rest of his stuff...I don't credit at all as being real. So yes, he has NO credibility and is a definite red flag. PLUS....and this is purely from an LE point of view...I spent 27 years being lied to on a daily basis and if I were interviewing him I would be calling BS if he said it was raining and I was getting soaked. I am absolutely convinced that the P-G film is genuine. Everything about that, especially the enhanced and stabilized versions now available SCREAM "live creature". Standing, I am convinced, is desperately trying to hold onto his "brand" and his cult of followers and I believe he is actively engaged in hoaxing in order to do it.

Thanks for posting that. It's a really interesting bit of video. I'm not saying I'm "convinced" but I will say "Hmmmmmmmm.....that dang sure doesn't look like a bear". As an addendum, the "appearance" of the impression of a thick lower jaw and the right shoulder are compelling.

What happens when a conservationist working in Iowa's timberlands begins to sense that something is watching him? In this eerie and intense episode, we sit down with Jesse, a forestry contractor from Van Buren County, Iowa, who shares a lifetime of strange experiences that range from childhood encounters with hairy beings to mysterious orbs, tree structures, mind-speak, and being told to leave certain areas of the woods immediately. Jesse's detailed accounts—rooted in conservation work across locations like Lockridge, Douds, and the legendary Lacey Keosauqua State Park—paint a vivid picture of how something ancient might still be hiding in Iowa's forgotten forests. If you've ever wondered what it's like to work every day in the backyard of Sasquatch, this episode will open your eyes—and keep you up at night. 🗣️ Share Your Story Had a Bigfoot encounter or strange experience? Send it to bigfootsociety@gmail.com – your story might be featured on the show! 🎥 Watch & Subscribe on YouTube 🔴 Subscribe here → Bigfoot Society YouTube 💬 Leave a comment & let us know your thoughts! 📞 Leave a voicemail with your story → Speakpipe (Use multiple voicemails if needed) 👥 Share this episode → Watch & Share 🎧 More episodes → Podcast Playlist 🌲 Recommended: New Jersey Bigfoot Encounters 💥 Support the Show & Get Perks ✅ Join the community on Supercast – Become a Member ✅ Listen ad-free & early on YouTube – Join Here 📱 Let’s Connect Instagram: @bigfootsocietyTwitter: @bigfoot_societyTikTok: @bigfoot.society🧰 Tools & Partners I Use (Affiliate Links) These help support the show at no extra cost to you: Beam (Better Sleep): Try BeamWildgrain (Better Bread): Join HereSeed (Probiotics): Get SeedMedi-Share (Healthcare): Learn MoreLMNT (Electrolytes) Free Sample Pack with your first purchase! : Get LMNTOrganic and non-GMO groceries delivered for less http://thrv.me/uarEhS🎙️ Podcasting Tools: Repurpose.io: Try ItDescript: Sign UpStreamyard: Start RecordingRiverside.fm: Try Riverside🎧 My Audio Interface: View on Amazon ☕ Buy Me a Coffee – Support Here 🛍️ Grab Some Merch – Shop on Etsy 📬 Mailing Address: Bigfoot Society 125 E 1st St. #233 Earlham, IA 50072 📧 Business Inquiries: bigfootsociety@gmail.comListen to the Podcast

New member here. CA male, 66 Yrs retiree. High interest in outdoors, hiking, camping, trekking and odd road. Interested in Bigfoot research, data and sightings and hope to learn more here. Thanks for having me

Cliff Barackman and James "Bobo" Fay speak with Terrestrial, the founder and researcher behind the Sasquatch Data Project! The project aims to give sasquatch researchers a comprehensive dataset of sighting reports optimized for analysis, and Terrestrial is here to discuss her work and findings thus far! Check out her YouTube channel HERE. Note: This episode was recorded on Sept. 1st, 2025. Start your free online visit with Hims today at http://hims.com/beyond Sign up for our weekly bonus podcast "Beyond Bigfoot & Beyond" and ad-free episodes! Get your official "Bigfoot & Beyond: Enter The Sasquatch" shirt!Listen to the Podcast

Tossing in Giganto was a stretch. We agree to disagree.

Evidently you do. Science does this all the time. With bones, with flesh, with hair. 🤷‍♂️

Fake. The plastic fantastic was bankrolled by an entertainment company. The end result was guessing about Patty based upon a 16mm film, guessing about Neanderthals and tossing in Giganto. The skull was: from hiflier on 09-08-2023; "Meldrum used Dr. Grover Krantz' reconstruction of a Gigantopithcus skull that Krantz had created using its jaw fragment size as a basis for sizing the head and sagittal crest. Krantz then used his knowledge of Gorilla skulls to proportion the rest of it. That's what's on top of the 8' tall 3D-printed skeleton.". Way to go hiflier! To me, Giganto was a giant panda. I have not wasted much time on the movie prop, so post about the length of the Calcanus. Does it have a bacula? No bacula, then it is Matilda's really big sister. Credentials, credentials? I don't need credentials.

A definite classic! I have been on the hunt for property in NW WA for a while.

When it comes to Bigfoot a “body on a slab” would be 100% convincing. (Obviously this assumes the public would have access to it). At its best, Great Bigfoot DNA doesn’t seem like it’s even suggestive let alone convincing. The thread posts tell me no matter how good the sample process, analysis, and results it is not a home-run like I would think. I know many of you are very knowledgeable and I appreciate the posts. After all these thread responses I’m just getting the impression it’s too complicated for any potential payoff on the Bigfoot issue. Paternity DNA = Convincing Sample in the woods = Pretty convincing if the sample proves to be an antelope or a dog. suspected Bigfoot DNA. = Not definitive/ open to various interpretations Keep up the good work guys. This issue is worthwhile but I think m moving on to other threads for a while. This DNA issue is giving me a headache.

Join me this weekend as we celebrate the life of Dr. Jeff Meldrum and his impact on the subject of Sasquatch. I will be joined by many of his friends who come on to share their memories of him. This is part two. Listen to the Podcast

Thank you very much!

I was about 8-10 years old when my dad and I climbed up onto our mountain in search of a Christmas tree for mom. We were walking a logging road, with my dad cutting trail through the deep snow, when a set of tracks came off the bank and was ahead of us on the road. They were just big oblong punch marks. No details. But what stood out was that whatever it was, was walking cleanly through the snow. Dad was pushing snow with his thighs and our track looked like cross country skiing. This creature was not dragging its feet. It was walking cleanly through deep snow. These tracks were BIG. I have tracked Moose and Elk and Bear in snow. It was none of those things. Plus it was December so Bears should be taking the big nap by then. After following these tracks for aways? My father abruptly turned to me and said “we are getting out of here”. Our ranch is in Stevens county Washington, 30 miles from the Canadian border, and 15 miles from Bossburg Wa. The site of the famous “Bossburg tracks”.

Back in 2012, I exchanged whistles and knocks with something in the woods at my kids summer camp out in the Oregon woods. In 2018, my old dog and I kept finding frosty, barefoot prints at a lake. It intrigued me mightily. I met up with Tobe Johnson, and he taught me a few things about the species. For the next several years, NorthWind and I tramped all around the Oregon woods, eventually seeing two on FLIR on July 5, 2020 and one in a daylight, distant sighting in October 2020. I've spent this summer honing my backpacking and kayaking skills in preparation for multi-day adventures soon, and have upgraded some equipment. I used to care what people thought about my sightings, print finds, and audio, but now? Well, they exist and I've seen them. That's reality, and if someone can't acknowledge that or understand it, then that's on them; not my problem. They are free to believe what they wish, but I KNOW.

Saw "Bigfoot" in the mid-70s in The Six Million Dollar Man and In Search Of; even did a creative writing story on Bigfoot (in 6th grade) at that time, and then completely forgot about the topic for 40 years. Happened to have free time and available mental energy to become interested again in the early 2010s when Legend Meets Science and Finding Bigfoot came on the air. Was bewildered that the basic question (is it all a hoax or do they exist) wasn't resolved after 40 years. Just got pulled down the rabbit hole from there. I don't ever expect to encounter one; heck, I couldn't even encounter a moose or bear in two weeks in Alberta. Currently a skeptical believer after having compiled a lot of data that constantly fits into bell curves and doesn't fit into typical fraud patterns (except for a few clear frauds) and interviewing a witness or two. I would probably put the actual number of "true" encounters at 25% of those reported by people to websites. I hope to add something to the pile of evidence that is of use to others.