All Activity

'I personally think the Guy got his locations mixed up, but if he says he made his way up the Toba then we'd have to assume he did.. Assuming this is true however,, i don't believe that he could be sure of being taken 25 Miles North/North East of the Toba by a Sasquatch ( he actually said 10 Miles in what i read ), especially with, as you pointed out, him coming out down by the Sechelt Inlet. That would say to me that he got taken South/South East instead, it would also mean that Mt Baker would have been more likely with regards to visibility. Anyway's, he believed that he had made 10 Miles or so from the head of the Toba Inlet in a North/North East direction when he first noticed disturbances.. He said he was awake for around about 3 hours inside the Sleeping Bag until they reached their destination & was asleep when he was picked up, speed would be unknown but was " going at a trot for a long time ".. He actually said he was awakened when he was picked up but half aseep, then said he had " no idea when it started as i was asleep when he picked me up ".. On his " escape " he made 3 miles in " record time " & then headed West emerging 2 days later on the Salmon Arm of Sechelt Inlet.. He simply must have headed South/South East whilst in the Sleeping Bag, towards the Sechelt Inlet but on the East side of the Jervis Inlet.. The distance from Ostman's alleged Camp which is inclusive of the 10 Miles North East he thought he made from landing at the head of the Toba, to the middle of the Salmon Arm is around 60 Miles.. If we are to assume that Ostman was taken South by the Sasquatch, then in 3 hours the Sasquatch would need to have been going at a pace of around 15 Miles per hour on average for those 3 hours or so that he was aware he was being transported, to be there or thereabouts & within the time & distances..'

Villainizing Sasquatch promotes and attempts to justify the idea that killing a Male and a Female is the best way to prove them to Science. As I'm sure you know, there are many dangerous animals and many laws against poaching. I'm not terrified of Spiders as you say, I actually admire and study them. I am just cautious and respective of many animals, those that kill humans and those that don't. I don't know what they eat and neither do you. And, in Ape Canyon, I'm assuming that you would be armed to the hilt and preferably not alone (I would be.) There are actually numerous animals and plants that 'throw' projectiles. Do the math yourself. You are generalizing the term 'Science' a bit randomly. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projectile_use_by_non-human_organisms

If the Washington DOT has caught it on FLIR cameras? The Feds have certainly caught it on all their surveillance.

We have evidence. Yes. John Mioncynski talks about Elk with broken necks. The Bauman story the trapper had a broken neck. The Nahanni headless valley. The Indian stories of Sasquatch being a giant cannibal. The Yeti is known as a Yak killer as well. How is a 800 lbs primate gonna feed itself in snowy mountains six months out of the year?🤷🏻‍♂️ DO THE MATH. ITS NOT A NOTION. Its called science. Its been happening for 100s of years. And don't shoot the messenger! I didn't write the rules. I hunt in Grizzly country and I cannot fathom a more terrifying scenario than having my cabin bombarded by giant rocks from a group of giants that are working in a organized attack. Animals don't do that. They don't throw projectiles and they don't conduct warfare on a human scale. Evidently Sasquatch do. That is terrifying. Port Chatham AK? Same story. If you want to be more terrified of spiders in your attic and think of Sasquatch as a gentle giant? Thats your prerogative to do so.

I have been in the woods with Nathan in north Idaho. He is a very respectful, knowledgeable young man.👍

You and I and most of the world don't get up every day of our lives and say, "Gee what do I have to do today to convince skeptics and the science community as a whole Bigfoot exists" But, if for any reason we had a body and especially a capture live specimen that would convince the most convinced skeptic, and it would quickly shift a new truth to the science world. One day science said the panda didn't exist. Sometime later, you can't find a single credible science who would say otherwise. One body and a little time solved the issue. That is all I am saying. We all have different standards to say, "I'm convinced" For some they require little and others a lot. Some I might say require too much. A body would convince all groups. The weird thing to me is AI poisoning the well. Back in the 1960's the PGF froze the encounter to a binary choice. That is, it is either a real creature OR a man in a suit. Now today if a great PGF like encounter occurred you might have another choice. Is it a high tech AI hoax made so well it will convince most people. And to think THAT was the 1990s.

What isn't so obvious to me is this: Why let their incalcitrant demands dictate my beliefs and activities? Why must I drag them kicking and screaming into what I believe is true? Why not let them rest smugly in their offices and classrooms in proud denial? I'm not responsible to update biology or anthropology. My hope is simply to see a sasquatch in the wild before I die (which is becoming pretty unlikely to occur now).

This is a very good point. We assume the 1,000 of miles of border are so secured they could see easily anything from a lost dog to bigfoot (and clearly identify it). Is that assumption correct? Assuming that is the case, it's a strong point. Are all areas of the northern border protected equally? I don't know how good the tech is and if that tech is universally that good along the entire border. Could good tech still so limited it looks like a blob on a scan resembling a hunter in the woods? I don't know Are there enough eyes to see? How good are those eyes? Finally, if Bigfoot is near extinct there are few encounter opportunities. Patty probably lived her entire life in Bluff Creek and the surrounding area. Unless she felt the need to travel, she may have never traveled more than X miles from home here entire life. If so, that might be she never was near the Canadian border. Granted that only might account for one specimin- Patty. Security cam from a store robbery: Cheap cell phone: Could be. For an event to be covered up the event first has to occur in the first place. Then, assuming it does, there has to be a motivation for those coving up to cover up. I can dream up scenarios for or against this idea. I will keep an open mind for now.

Of course you should! Right now as I eat my morning granola and type on this laptop I'm watching Nathan (a former, and perhaps still present poster here) on his Study Sasquach channel. He just casted yet another footprint. Now, I'm not so impressed with yet another sasquatch footprint cast. There must be thousands of them now in various collections, including the PGF casts that came with a film of the creature actually making the footprints. They "prove" nothing. What I'm interested with in Nathan's videos are: 1) He's honest, no BS, and is as down to Earth as they get 2) He's active and tenacious, and I can always expect him to provide an excellent video of his experiences 3) And he uses incredibly wonderful gear, which is a science in and of itself, and even at my age, I'm still interested in such stuff for hunting (which my tyrannical wife and decreasing health seems to increasingly prevent me from enjoying)

Represented by a governing body like, for example, the American Medical Association and National Institute of Health within the United States governs medical science? Or is it a journalist, like he/they who publishes (ore refuses to publish) journals? I will suggest that government's power over Science is more about their control of money, which Science is every bit as interested in as everybody else.

That all makes sense to me. I just think of it this way: When it comes to Bigfoot What one piece of evidence would be so convincing nearly every scientist in world would accept it? The answer is obvious. It is not a perfect new high def. Bigfoot video. It is not some DNA evidence. It is not a footprint. There is only one answer: A BODY. That body could be a body on a slab or a body secure in a cage/ trap. I might require less. But a Body would remove all doubt to 99.9999999999999% of the world. Take the iceman. Until we had him some of that what thought of recent ancient man was educated guesswork. Now they have a body. It might generate more Q's but no one would say there is no recent ancient man to begin with esp now.

That might be because you were born and educated some 100+ years after its birth. There has been lots of time for it to evolve itself. An example would be the question about why there are still crocodiles, which have existed without any evolving, while there are no Plesiadapiforms anymore (or for a long, long, long time). Darwin's two major publications, Origin of Species (1859) and The Descent of Man (1871) came precisely during the discovery era of gorillas, and there was plenty of social, religious, and scientific hubbub during the period between Thomas Savage delivering a gorilla scull to the Boston Society of Natural History in 1847 and Paul duChaillu's return from Africa with a dead gorilla carcass in 1859.

So, you have proof that Bigfoot run down prey and break their necks? I guess I should be watching more youtube videos. If Bigfoot are such an aggressive threat to humans then it seems like we would have a body already. Instead, they seem to avoid us like the plague. I was not talking about classifying magnificent animals, I was talking about the notion that the only way to classify one was to kill a male and a female. You can bet all you want, but you don't know me. There are many far more dangerous places than Ape Canyon, WA.

There has to be a connection between the Ebu Gogo, Orang Pendak and what we call a Hobbit. If there is not? Then that Jungle is just loaded with potential bipedal cryptids! How many unknown species are down there? I have always wanted to go on a Orangutan expedition. Would be a great winter Vaca!

Where do you think he was? Great job!👍

The collective body of scientists is the final voice. In a peer reviewed journal. This is why Melba Ketchum got the smack down. She circumvented the whole process and her work was garbage. But the Government is also the supreme judge because it controls the flow of information. Science cannot be done correctly without testable and repeatable results for the whole body to examine. This doesn’t happen in compartmentalized cells each not knowing the results of the other. And then compound that globally among adversaries.

^ That is a good point, thank-you, Huntster. I could only add that an ideology struggle over Darwinism doesn't make much, if any, sense to me. Are there actually opinions with any credibility that deny random variations in organisms? And, if so, is there any credible notion that favorable (along with unfavorable) variations are passed down to offspring? That seems like a no-brainer to me. And, I think (hope) that the favorable variations are prevailing, overall. Although, these days, it often seems like evolution is going backwards..

Gorillas don't eat meat and they don’t run down prey and break its neck. They live in tropical Africa in lush jungles. A Bigfoot is bipedal. A Bigfoot lives in mountainous regions of North America. It cannot sit around all day long 365 days a year eating leaves. Its tracking game in snow. Like we would….. If you are more afraid of black widow spiders? So be it. But I bet if you were in the cabin at Ape Canyon? You would be quite scared. Magnificent or non magnificent has nothing to do with scientific classification of biology. We don't just kill and classify ugly animals.🧐

No, but the original "discovery" of lowland gorillas (a process during the years 1847-1859) came (part and parcel) with a world ideology/struggle that continues to this day: Darwinism.

This. The federal government have agencies full of scientists, and their work and publications are government property. It may or may not be published. So if it isn't published, is it still Science? Is it still truth? We've been told that even the POTUS has been kept in the dark over many issues over the "need to know" doctrine. But if the POTUS learns that aliens exist, and he/she announces it, does it make it so? If not, why not? Who then looks into the POTUS's claim and verifies it? Somebody has to be the final voice of discovery. Who is that, and how did he/she get that power? Beating Uncle Sam to an alien crash site is pretty much beyond the capability of Joe Sixpack, but beating authorities of all levels to a fresh sasquatch habitation area? Very, very possible...........

I had to dig real deep for this bad boy, nearly 15 years deep in fact but i found it. I'm still adamant that he got his locations mixed up too, and i'm gonna send this to Aleks..

Jeremy Wells - From builder to Bigfoot: Stites artist brings ‘Squatchy’ to Life Idaho County Free PressView the full article

Russell Wiitala went looking for Bigfoot nearly 20 years ago. Eventually, something started answering back. In this episode of Bigfoot Society, Russell takes us deep into his experiences across Washington and the Pacific Northwest, beginning with strange tracks, powerful odors, unexplained knocks, and vocalizations in the Willapa Hills. Then the encounters get closer. Russell describes a January 2025 trip to Ocean Shores, Washington, where he spotted a figure standing beside the road before daylight. When he and his friend returned to investigate, his friend saw a gray-haired figure attempting to hide among the trees in a swamp. Russell also shares years of experiences throughout the Olympic Peninsula and Wynoochee area: long screams echoing across valleys, rocks striking tents, strange voices in the forest, possible juvenile Sasquatch activity, trees coming down, unexplained gifts, and something descending a ridge and entering his campsite while he listened from inside his tent. Some of Russell’s later experiences move into even stranger territory. He describes possible cloaking, mind-speak, unusual dreams, unexplained physical sensations, and his belief that certain locations may play a role in Sasquatch activity. After nearly two decades of searching across four states and more than 30 areas, Russell has developed a very different understanding of what may be living in these forests. This is one of those Bigfoot Society conversations that keeps getting stranger the deeper it goes. Listen through the end and decide for yourself what Russell encountered in the woods. Locations discussed include Raymond, the Willapa Hills, Ocean Shores, Wynoochee, the Olympic Peninsula, Lake Cushman, Staircase, and other areas of the Pacific Northwest. Resources: Russell’s book: https://www.amazon.com/Sasquatch-Shaman-Woods-Russell-Wiitala-ebook/dp/B09LTH43L9 https://www.youtube.com/@SasquatchShamanoftheWoods Listen to the Podcast

Until they fall into one category or the other, they don't fall into either. And, if they are never classified, they will never fall into either category. So, I think you are putting the cart before the horse. I read your post (and certainly not trying to call you out, especially since you graciously run the show here and participate intelligently, probably more than anyone else.) But, I still have not seen any indication that a full skeleton of both a male and a female Bigfoot would be required by Science.

Did Scientific classification of the Mountain Gorilla, finally, in 1902 cause World panic? Did millions of World Government employees conspire effectively to keep Mountain Gorillas a secret since the beginning of recorded history, up until 1902? Of course not. They were just an extraordinary discovery that required definitive proof before most people who had never seen one would 'believe'. As Backdoc has indicated (several times I think) there is no massive, coordinated conspiracy required for Bigfoot to exist and not yet be classified. "A very large alpha predator that is intelligent living in remote dense mountainous terrain poses a significant threat." How do you know they are an Alpha predator? How do you know they are intelligent? How do you know they are a threat? just wondering I am more scared of Black Widow spiders than Bigfoot although, they are very non-aggressive and I hope I never need to kill one. Unless there is no other viable option, Bigfoot, Black Widows and many other creatures are just too magnificent to kill, in my opinion.