Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Today
  2. REVIEW: 'Capturing Bigfoot' – Abominable showmen Nerdvana MediaView the full article
  3. norseman

    UAP and Bigfoot?

    I certainly DO NOT think everything is a human invention wrapped in a secret. I think there is plenty of history going back centuries of craft doing spectacular things in the sky. Even as recent as WW2. It wasn't a secret USAF program. The USAF didn't even exist yet. Something is going on outside of humanity. What it is has been elusive. And there may be not just one clear cut answer.
  4. And as you and I both know? The UN is all bark and no bite. The miners and loggers continue to go into the jungle and ignore its inhabitants. And the Government continues to look the other way. Look? Human rights being extended to a cryptid ape man that is not Homo Sapiens is a question to be answered after discovery. We don't know what a Sasquatch is or its relationship to us until we have its genome. So we need to keep the cart behind the horse. You would think with an army of biologists out preserving eco systems that they would have a full inventory of everything living out there. That's their job, this is what they are paid to do. Maybe they know its out there but they have not convinced the brass. Maybe they don't know its out there at all. Or maybe they all know its out there but flat refuse to give it its rightful place with a scientific classification? Regardless if a tiny club like the Olympic project can document nesting sites and plaster tracks and audio calls and all the rest of the evidence that something called Sasquatch resides out there? I find it highly dubious that an army of Government biologists have no clue about this phenomenon. So now we are full circle. Is the Government more than happy to allow Sasquatch to go extinct? If true? That's a conspiracy if I ever heard one and flies in the face of their mission statement.
  5. Thed international community has already addressed the existence of uncontacted Homo sapiens: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncontacted_peoples A key phrase with this commission is "human rights", which non-humans don't have. Granted, sasquatches aren't likely to be homo sapiens (even though the Zana story proves that such hominins might be), if they are of the genus "Homo", they're "human". From the above reference: "State of nature" is. yet another consideration: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_nature I submit that governments (American, Russian, Canadian, Chinese, Indian, etc) really don't want to go here, especially if forced to by a tiny population of nearly extinct hominins who want nothing to do with us.
  6. Do these creatures haunt America's woods? Why they fascinate us USA TodayView the full article
  7. I think feral people absolutely are. Ask the Brazilian government.
  8. We (mankind) does, but we're not considered to be or managed like wildlife.
  9. Yesterday
  10. norseman

    Ultralight canoe and a thermal

    Sounds awesome! Good luck!
  11. Is it part of their “ecosystem”? Does it drink their water, poop on their land, eat their plants and other wildlife?
  12. David writes "Wes, For a little while, I worked part-time at a cancer center for a commercial cleaning company to pay off a credit card. I cleaned the majority of the facility, while my partner cleaned the remainder. As a result, I worked the last hour or so alone. One evening, I had to take some trash outside while my coworker was vacuuming the front lobby. As I was walking back toward the building, I saw someone sitting on a couch in the front lobby. The person appeared to be elderly. My coworker was on the other side of the room and wouldn't have been able to see them. I went inside and told him there was still a patient in the building. I walked over to the couch and turned around, but there was no one there. He asked me if I could still see someone. I told him, "Not anymore. Let me walk outside and see if I can still see them." I went back outside, but whoever I had seen was gone. I have one more encounter to share, and this one was a bit unsettling. I was about to leave the building with the last of the trash and set the alarm for the night. I was alone. I had the feeling that I was being watched from the long hallway to my left. At the end of the hallway was another waiting area that remained lit all night. Between the door where I was standing and the waiting room, the hallway was dark. The lights were divided into separate sections that turned on when motion was detected. I saw a figure about 50 feet away, standing off to one side in the dark hallway. There were rooms and alcoves on both sides. The figure was facing me, but I couldn't make out any details because it was backlit. I knew this wasn't a person because their movement would have triggered the motion-activated lights, and I knew I was alone in the building. I asked it what it wanted. I also told it that if it was trying to scare me, it was wasting its time. The figure was wearing high heels. I could see them, and I could hear them, too. It stepped off to the right and into one of the alcoves in a single, fluid motion. The right leg moved over first, followed by the left. Then the figure was completely out of sight. Again, the motion-activated lights never came on. I set the alarm and left. I'd experienced some strange feelings in that place before, but those were the only two things I actually saw. Thanks, Wes. I love the show and appreciate the help you give all of us." John "It was toward the end of August, sometime between 6:30 and 7:00 p.m., with the late-day sun just beginning to set. I was heading east on Highway 74 toward Kingston. There were woods on the driver's side and Prayer Lake on the right. I was driving a Ram ProMaster van, leaning forward with both hands on the steering wheel, when I glanced to my left and noticed a clear-cut area running up the side of a hill. In the middle of that clearing was something I couldn't explain. Keep in mind, I was traveling between 50 and 60 mph, so I only had a brief moment to take it in. What stood out first was the shape of its shoulders. They formed a rounded triangle, and its shoulders looked about the size of a basketball. The setting sun was shining through the trees and hitting its hair, giving it a shiny sheen. Its hair appeared straight, smooth, and well-kept. The next thing I noticed was the size of its right bicep. It looked as big as a Butterball turkey! By then, I had to turn my attention back to the road, and I was already around the corner. It took me about a mile to process what I had just seen. I finally turned to my stepson and asked, "Did I just see a Bigfoot?" I can't say for certain that I saw a Bigfoot, but I know I saw something that I had only ever heard about before. I'm posting a couple of pictures of the location. I also used AI to add a Bigfoot figure to one of the pictures to give you an idea of what it looked like. The location and the picture of the hill are real; the Bigfoot image is only for reference. Thank you for your time!" Listen to the Podcast
  13. True, but there are lots and lots of sasquatch hunters out there doing their own things and self funded. Organizing a quick reaction cooperative shouldn't be real tough or expensive. Another bug issue would be an organized effort on classified public lands like a national forest. Just one curious fed asking, "What's going on out here?" can start the trouble. You can't even film commercially without a permit.
  14. Is a hominin "wildlife", or should a hominin be "managed" like wildlife?
  15. BC witness

    Field trips 2.0

    Great looking country! I'll have to get busy and post some pics of my recent trip through BC, Yukon, and Northwest Territory. We saw a LOT of wildlife.
  16. norseman

    Field trips 2.0

    Up by Priest lake on a tight jeep trail for part of it. Bald Mountain area. Saw deer and rubs and a owl. Tamarack is all turning yellow.
  17. Your plan is very imaginative, and it would be a great start to put into action. The end results would be a deceased or a live sasquatch depending on the encounter situation. Using BFRO is a great idea for focusing this Squatch One Team or SOT on active bigfoot sites. SOT would need to employ a travel supervisor who would arrange private jet flights to the designated American state and secure established camping parks that would accommodate 10 dogs and a 20 person crew including a film team of 2 . One major issue would be the funding. Funding would be partially through private money and TV documentaries. Movie/TV rights would fund the project after the team supervisor contracts with a film company who would broadcast a weekly TV series.
  18. Maybe I am a stubborn pot stirrer. But if I see one? I am putting it down. The chips can fall where they may. But truth is truth.
  19. I would argue that would fall under the gross negligence category. And it still may fall into the conspiracy side as well. You hire an army of biologists that tell you you have an a 800 lbs primate in your forest. And you berate them into silence and don’t believe them? So any data that is mistakenly brought in by the agency it will simply be destroyed to fit your narrative? Biologists are out there collecting stool samples, water samples, hair samples, trail camera, thermal camera, etc, etc. They have eyes and have also probably seen tracks as well. We KNOW the data will be there! So maybe as you say MIB this is a institutional problem within our agencies. But even if the biologists and the data are not being believed by the top brass? Thats still gross negligence AND a conspiracy IMHO. I would argue its not important why they suppress the data. Whether they simply don't believe its real or they are afraid of the truth. 🤷🏻‍♂️ I determined it based on their own mission statement.
  20. Sightings of Sasquatch? The River 95.3View the full article
  21. Depends on how you determine what their job is.
  22. Seeing Sasquatch: Which states have the highest odds of spotting Bigfoot? Cleveland.comView the full article
  23. Seeing Sasquatch: Which states have the highest odds of spotting Bigfoot? PennLive.comView the full article
  24. Seeing Sasquatch: Which states have the highest odds of spotting Bigfoot? Cleveland.comView the full article
  25. Sweeney

    New Member Introductions

    Hello there! New member checking in. Just been browsing some of the fascinating stories and opinions posted here. Looking forward to learning more. Jim Sweeney
  26. Third option: at the level that controls the purse strings, the gov't does not believe bigfoot exists so looking for them never gets taken seriously enough to be assigned. That doesn't require field people not to know about bigfoot. How do you truly rock the boat, not merely look stupid, unless you have proof in hand, and if you have proof in hand, can you prove you were not gathering that on work hours while neglecting your specifically assigned duties?
  27. Yakima Valley Bigfoot Con Brings Sasquatch Experts to Our Studio News Talk KITView the full article
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...