All Activity

There is a hell of a lot more within Paulides cases that is genuinely interesting than a bunch of deadfall in the woods. As I told you? Don’t take Paulides word for anything. Go read other accounts of the same cases.

Paulides is a con man. I've been telling you this for a while.

The Federal government probably isn’t going to come after you legally. But they are definitely gonna come after IT. And if you resist? Then you’re probably gonna die. If you don’t resist? Then your probably gonna get a stern warning to never ever talk about this to anyone. And you won’t have any proof to back up your story. People talk about which state allows people to hunt listed or non listed game species. I don’t think any of this applies. It’s not gonna be a state game warden knocking at your door. Or a Skamania county deputy enforcing some misdemeanor. If I am correct in my assessment? The Feds will do what is necessary to protect the secret. Look at the storm Area 51 debacle. What are they gonna do? Shoot all of us? The governments reply was ABSOLUTELY! It is not easy swimming against the current. How bad do you wanna know the truth? Is it worth dying over? And this is if Bigfoot doesn’t use you as a human tree knocker first. I walked many miles in the woods and have played this scenario out in my mind 2 million times. Getting the body on the ground is just step one, and probably the easiest part of the whole process.

Coal Valley is a town.

Good find Bipedalist: Rich Germeau, co-founder of the Olympic Project and LEO Bigfoot Experiencer (interviewed on A Flash of Beauty) I watched parts one and two of riches Bigfoot experiences, and he is a very down to earth credible eyewitness. Rich was a sheriff, and he has investigated many big foot occurrences, and he is very credible. If you listen to part one all the way through there is a point to where he notices the woo factor of Bigfoot, and he is unable to explain this. This is what happened to me during some of my field experiences involving Bigfoot. This has confused him because he is a very down-to-earth sheriff, and he is trained to deal in hard facts. When people observe Bigfoot most of the time it's a flesh and blood occurrence, but some people such as Rich and Tom Powell of the Portland Bigfoot community have mentioned in detail that some reliable eyewitnesses have observed Bigfoot in supernatural occurrences. I'm reasonably sure that Forest Service's top ranked Wildlife biologist have also noticed this Woo factor that's also part of a Bigfoot observations. This might be why the top echelon of the PHD Forest Service biologist have come to stalemate due to this woo factor so they simply call Bigfoot a legend or part of folklore. What do you think of the woo factor and what will happen if these top Forest Service wildlife biologist are given permission to publish what they have observed in the field in regards to Bigfoot's. They are very detail oriented and many of them get to spend many hours in the forest observing wildlife. If the top echelons of the Forest Service divulge all of their information on Sasquatch how will this effect logging on over 190 million acres? if the Endangered Species proponents suggest that logging be hampered throughout the entire National Forest what can the Forest Service do to prevent this?

You make sense for a reasonable defense for shooting a bigfoot and killing it. There is probably some law prohibiting shooting bigfoot such as the law in Minnesota that allows the killing of a listed nuisance animal and bigfoot is not on the list. "You can take some animals which are normally protected by Minnesota Statute without a license or permit if they are doing damage. If you are the landowner, manager or occupant of the property where the animal is causing damage, you can take the following animals." Here is another confusing statement from the forest service: "While most people believe the Sasquatch to be a thing of folklore and urban legend, researcher Thaddeus Guttenberg, with the U.S. Forest Service Mythical Wildlife Division, recently confirmed that Bigfoot is every bit as real as he is." “We’ve been keeping his existence under wraps for years to protect his privacy,” said Guttenberg. “But because the country is losing more and more open space each day, we wanted to make it known that the habitat to one of America’s greatest legends may be at risk.” Loss of Space Threatening North American Sasquatch | Home

^^^ If a Hunter shot Bigfoot maybe they should just claim self-defense. If Bigfoot is determined to be essentially human, one can actually claim self-defense vs an attacking human. After all what kind of doctor does one take a sick Werewolf to anyway?

^^ My understanding is that in most states, hunters are only allowed to take "permitted" animals - that is, animals that the state permits you to shoot, trap, or catch. Like what happened in Canada (discussed elsewhere in another thread) - hunters were permitted to take polar bears, and permitted to take brown bears (grizzlies?), but not permitted to take hybrid brown/polar bears. So, if I recall correctly, an American hunter got a huge fine for shooting a bear that was virtually indistinguishable (to the naked eye) from a bear he was permitted to take. Presuming one lives in a reasonable state - and that the shooting has been highly publicized so that it can't be swept under the rug - whomever first shoots and kills AND makes it out with the body could be reasonably safe.

Post Malone Compares SKIMS Modeling Gig to a 'Sasquatch S... ComplexView the full article

This makes me wonder. If the government went after someone for shooting a bigfoot would a reasonable defense be: "You guys deny it existed so how could I be responsible? You guys didn't make a law saying I couldn't shoot one as you considered it a fairytale?

She also "rode" a large balance wheel she removed from a machine shop and was 8&1/2 feet tall.

Published in the Pittsburgh (PA) Dispatch o/a Apr 5, 1891. The account actually covers two reports separated by an unknown period of time.

Have We Ever Been Alone? Some In Congress Say No: What Happens After Catastrophic DisclosureView the full article

Is 'Bigfoot' the NYS Fair’s strangest attraction yet? Snake thinks so Rome SentinelView the full article

News of this encounter made it all the way to Utah! This "splinter" of news was published in the Salt Lake City (UT) Woman's Exponent on September 15, 1873.

What happens when a young boy’s summer afternoon in the Cascade foothills turns into a brush with something massive, gray, and very much alive? In this chilling episode, master botanist Keith shares decades of encounters stretching from Newcastle, Washington, to the wilds of California’s Sierra Nevada. You’ll hear about the day a Sasquatch rose to its full height just feet away, the night screams echoed through the forest like a woman being torn apart, and the time a pyramid of six glowing lights floated toward a tree fort with terrifying intent. From Cougar Mountain to Willow Creek, Keith’s stories weave together close-range sightings, rockfalls, strange smells, and moments when the woods seemed to hold their breath. This is a rare, raw firsthand account of how one man’s childhood playground became the stage for some of the most unnerving encounters we’ve ever heard. 🗣️ Share Your Story Had a Bigfoot encounter or strange experience? Send it to bigfootsociety@gmail.com – your story might be featured on the show! 🎥 Watch & Subscribe on YouTube 🔴 Subscribe here → Bigfoot Society YouTube 💬 Leave a comment & let us know your thoughts! 📞 Leave a voicemail with your story → Speakpipe (Use multiple voicemails if needed) 👥 Share this episode → Watch & Share 🎧 More episodes → Podcast Playlist 🌲 Recommended: New Jersey Bigfoot Encounters 💥 Support the Show & Get Perks ✅ Join the community on Patreon – Become a Member ✅ Listen ad-free & early on YouTube – Join Here 📱 Let’s Connect Instagram: @bigfootsocietyTwitter: @bigfoot_societyTikTok: @bigfoot.society🧰 Tools & Partners I Use (Affiliate Links) These help support the show at no extra cost to you: Beam (Better Sleep): Try BeamWildgrain (Better Bread): Join HereSeed (Probiotics): Get SeedMedi-Share (Healthcare): Learn MoreLMNT (Electrolytes) Free Sample Pack with your first purchase! : Get LMNTOrganic and non-GMO groceries delivered for less http://thrv.me/uarEhS🎙️ Podcasting Tools: Repurpose.io: Try ItDescript: Sign UpStreamyard: Start RecordingRiverside.fm: Try Riverside🎧 My Audio Interface: View on Amazon ☕ Buy Me a Coffee – Support Here 🛍️ Grab Some Merch – Shop on Etsy 📬 Mailing Address: Bigfoot Society 125 E 1st St. #233 Earlham, IA 50072 📧 Business Inquiries: bigfootsociety@gmail.com Listen to the Podcast

Not a report of an encounter, but a story on how Robert "Bob" Chance was investigating encounters in the 1970s. Many of his reports made their way to John Green and were included in his database. You find many of these reports in the SSR and in the John Green Sightings forum courtesy of Redbone.

I sent you message I sent you a message

Bears are a lot smarter than folks think. But their bully attitudes and unsatiable appetite overwhelms their intelligence.

I've already stated it, you quoted me, and it aligns perfectly with the statement you posted from the USFS, and I explained why I believe they have taken that position. I'm pretty confident that they don't. I don't think anybody in the agency wants to document anything about them. I didn't see a stamp or fine print footnote of official approval.

Ford Built a One-Off Bronco Sasquatch To 'Find Bigfoot' MSNView the full article

1. Good question and I'm going to quote what Norseman said, "Because that would require them to admit the creature is real." Remember bigfoot is what the forest service calls a mythical creature mentioned in folk tales. This means feel free to hunt them at your own risk. In reality remember before you try, they travel in groups in the deep forest, they are lightning fast, and they can tear bears apart in seconds for a lunch snack. They are not stupid and probably know taking out humans will bring in intensive search parties that disrupts their food foraging. I venture to say they rarely take out humans. If they do then they eat most of the flesh, then to keep from being detected they deeply bury the remains and disguise the grave. This is done by old starving bigfoots. 2. Ridiculous answer: The grey aliens who import bigfoots for some unknown reason have a treaty with the deep state federal government and that bigfoots will remain free to roam. It is a mythical creature and passing no hunting laws will indicate, as Norseman mentioned, that the government believes bigfoot is real. 3. If the forest service admits that bigfoots roams all 193 million acres of forest service lands, some bright group of biologist will try to classify bigfoot as an "endangered species" once it's captured or shot. This could restrict logging on bigfoot's habitat so much that we may need to buy most of our lumber from Canada. The Endangered Species Act (ESA) is the primary federal law in the United States that protects endangered and threatened species, along with their habitats.

Because that would require them to admit the creature is real. Just like issuing a hunting permit or putting up a warning sign on a trail or handing out safety pamphlets. All of these things require the authorities to admit that a 800 lbs primate roams our woods and they have no control over it and more terrifyingly it outsmarts them most of the time. If it was as dumb as a bear? It would already be in a zoo. If it was smarter than us? We would be in the zoo. Instead it fills a niche that terrifies Homo Sapiens. An ambush predator that loves thick cover. It is the “other” us. It’s in that “uncanny valley” state that robotics people talk about. It’s almost us, but it’s not us. And that terrifies humans. It’s why women used to feint when watching King Kong drag the dress torn woman to the top of the sky scraper. I think King Kong says an awful lot about humanity and our interaction with our closest living relatives over the last couple hundred thousand years. And maybe this is also the answer we seek concerning the cover up? Or at least one of them? And once you start telling lies? You cannot stop.

#1 Love the video. #2 A few years from now it is going to get really difficult to tell what is fake and what is real. This illustrates how good these vids are getting. Imagine a video 20 years from now; especially one made for harmful purposes vs comedy purposes.

This should be filed under the idea of "which is more likely" The thing that is more likely is probably true if the other option is really far-fetched.