All Activity

For me personally? Its authenticity has no bearing on things I have seen in the woods. And I am very sure that is true of others as well. And it also has no bearing going forward on proof of a new species. That requires a body. I will listen to new evidence. But as you say, everything thus far has been abysmal.

It’s 2026 and people are still desperately trying to discredit the film. So far all attempts have failed as none of them address the issues that exist with replicating the film subject with 1960’s costume technology.

Such surely brings into question any conclusions our new member draws.

I am not killing the messenger. You were cherry picking some “gotcha moment” Rogan video short against Meldrum. Which is a crock. It doesn’t even remotely represent what Meldrum said in the full interview let alone years of conferences and his BOOK!? Really? Have you read it? So hence forth I will be scrutinizing you based on this slanderous event you perpetrated on this forum. Sorry.

I’ve seen Heronimous in a costume….. I won’t hold my breath.

There’s also an unseen early film from the same location with the first trial costume?

Meldrum was just repeating Joe’s line where he explores what he thinks is a possibility. The only arguments presented here by skeptics are that people close to Patterson claim it’s a hoax. Meanwhile Patty herself has characteristics that aren’t repeatable with costumes.

Don’t kill the messenger it was Roger’s son Clint and Patricia Patterson. Clint explained the entire thing the only hope is that it was fake AI but I don’t see anyone questioning that on the News report in the link I posted above. Tune in Thursday after we watch it to go over the content.

Kind of like Meldrum’s “confession”??? Give me a break.

From the grave? Patterson passed away in 1972.

Patterson confession on film.

If it’s real? Do you get to keep your arms? 🤣

I volunteer to perform a blindfolded feel test on any purported Patty "suit" and live female test subject.

In what way, shape, or form?

Published in The Pacific Bee of Sacramento, California on October 11, 1879, but it appears to have been a reprint from the Philadelphia Times.

More from the Sun-Journal of Lewiston, Maine; I'm beginning to wonder if this paper was the National Enquirer of its day. The three stories are from July 25, July 31, and August 7, 1896, respectively.

https://people.com/famous-1967-bigfoot-film-was-staged-says-director-of-new-doc-11926085 The PGF is now a proven hoax.

Well, yeah - but Rogan also thought that Bob H walked identical to Patty based on nothing more scientific than the eye test, so I'll reserve judgement.

Interesting, as even Kitakaze is suggesting it's the Ahtanum Valley footage, which is discussed I believe in Greg Long's book, so it seems Joshua is at odds with Marq Evans on this. Okay - the breast thing is a bit suspicious, but we can't tell until we see those boobs.

I’m not Bart but Rogan got him to admit the truth. Now a documentary proves it with confessions and pre planned test run.

No. We have no body. Therefore we cannot rule out option A. No film includes a body for science to poke. You’re taking Meldrum out of context there. It’s cheap. A three second gotcha doesn’t erase his years of research on the subject. Or Bill Munns for that matter….. This might work on Reddit or some Facebook page. But it won’t work here. 🙄

Also apparently Bob is interviewed in the documentary. another quote from the director. "Yes, Bob saw the new footage and gives a very compelling answer to it. People will need to use their own judgment on what and when he knew."

from the *EDIT* Director of the film.

Explore The Stranger Side Of Reality (Release Date)View the full article