All Activity

Here are the facts. 1) The father always maintained his son had been kidnapped. 2) The father was searching for his son within 5 minutes. 3) The biggest lead they had, which is the Key testimony, was never followed up on. Timescale means nothing here. We can only speculate as to the meaning of the encounter because the FBI did nothing. 4) The last time I checked? Contraband moonshine or Ginseng does NOT scream. 5) I have established that families were removed from their homes to make a federal park. Did they all leave? Are there descendants still living inside the park? 6) The Green Berets have never been used in a missing persons case before or since. Why? 7) If Dennis had been attacked by a Bear or a Cougar? There would have been a struggle. And if there had been a kill? They would have found the kill site. Especially as long as they searched. Nothing was ever found of his personal effects. 8) You seem really tied up with David Paulides. But I am not. I have no dog in that fight at all. This case is well known. And why its well known is because of the oddities associated with it. But its perfectly OK that you want to dismiss it offhand based on your bias towards an author. 🤷🏻‍♂️

Attack the argument not the poster please.

Paulides is a con man. Norseman is a victim.

Published in the Weekly Santa Fe (NM) Gazette on July 18, 1868.

I tried to be clear on this but maybe I wasn't clear enough - it is entirely reasonable and expected for Bill Martin to de everything he possibly could to find his son and to get as many people and organisations as possible involved in helping him do that, in particular the FBI given their resources and their investigative powers and expertise involved, just as he did. I have a son of about the same age and would certainly do everything I could think of in those circumstances. Doug Martin (not the brother, the friend who was playing with Dennis just prior to his disappearance) said that his family had gone back some 3 years later and bumped into the grandfather Clyde, who said that he had been walking those trails every weekend for those years just because he couldn't give up. I suspect I would be the same. The pain must be unimaginable, made all the worse for not knowing. That's what makes distorting the facts to generate conspiracy in order to in turn profiteer off that pain and the almost certain death of a small boy all the worse. You seem to be still stuck in the false narrative of M411. The FBI didn't 'dismiss' the report. They met with Harold Key and Park officials on site to follow up. They accepted the Rangers' assessment that the scream was too far away to be relevant given the timeline. Harold Key, as far as I can find in newspaper reports and the NPS and FBI files, never called the man he saw 'mangy', 'hairy', 'dishevelled', 'unkempt' or anything else of that nature, just 'a man'. And no one was seen 'packing something through the woods'. This came out in Paulides' account some 50 years later. As I mentioned in my previous post, and as above, clearly Bill Martin was doing everything he could to get the FBI involved as was his right and duty. It's therefore all the more striking that he wasn't shouting from the rooftops to the FBI, the governor he wrote to and the newspapers about this man, if he was indeed carrying something. The only logical explanation is that Harold Key never actually said that that's what he saw. As much as Bill Martin (indeed anyone in that situation) might want to believe that their child was kidnapped so as to hold on to the hope that he might still be alive, and as much as he might wish to persuade the FBI that this was the kidnapper, the actual facts were that: Harold Key reported hearing a scream and seeing a man. This was most likely at the same time as Dennis went missing, possibly up to 60 minutes before, and no later than 60 minutes after. This was 90 minutes (fast hike, not carrying a struggling child) away. There's nothing odd about concluding that it wasn't relevant or credible evidence of any kidnapping of Dennis. In fact, by placing this man a minimum 90 minutes away within a max 60 mins of disappearance, it actually constitutes an alibi! I didn't say that the man was 'mangy' (see above for my thoughts on that) or that he was necessarily operating a still or picking ginseng. I offered those as examples given Harold Key's initial thought and the fact that there was an admitted illegal ginseng harvester in the area some years later, so that could be plausible. What I said was that he was probably up to no good, which was based on his making his way away from the Keys asap. it could be something else as I said, and it doesn't necessarily have to be illegal either. But it does seem that he didn't want to be approached. The one thing I do know beyond all reasonable doubt that he wasn't kidnapping Dennis Martin. If the Park Service believed there were unscrupulous bad actors in the Park, I'm quite sure they wouldn't immediately jump to 'I know this guy brews moonshine/picks ginseng, so with absolutely no evidence whatsoever, I'm going to assume he's also a child abductor'. I'm also pretty sure that the FBI wouldn't go along with it, assume authority and open up an investigation despite the fact that the timeline makes it impossible for this man to be involved anyway. I'm not sure what exactly you mean by 'feral people'. I'm assuming the 'more animal than man', cannibalistic, never touched by civilisation, type rumoured without verifiable evidence to live in the smoky mountains. But the video you posted doesn't show that kind of person - the first home shown belonged to a Mr Patterson who was Sheriff of the County, and a Mr Rust, a Warden, with a picture shown of him and his perfectly clean and well dressed children. A far cry from 'feral'. The Kari Swenson and Claude Dallas cases you previously mentioned dealt with people who wanted to live off grid in isolation but certainly not 'feral'. If dealing with the off grid isolation type person, why jump straight to the conclusion that they are child abductors and send the Green Berets after them without any evidence of wrongdoing? Note that as previously stated the Key testimony came over a month after the Green Berets had been deployed so it can't be that they were deployed because of that testimony, it would have to be a practically instant conclusion that it was abduction from within the Park. If dealing with the 'feral humans' why conduct a Green Beret take out mission in the middle of the most public, best attended SAR mission ever? The picture you give of a draconian Park Service that would certainly know of a single moonshining operation and who would never allow it to stand, also doesn't really tally for me with the idea of 'who and the heck knows what is inside that park' and the existence of people (whether feral or off grid types) who the park would instantly suspect in a child disappearance but who would also be either unknown or tolerated within the park. I'd also again make the point that if the NPS/FBI/Military had such a strong and instant belief that there were people living within the Park snatching children, they wouldn't be likely to send boy scout out looking for them. Not to mention the point I made about someone out of the thousands that took part in the SAR surely coming across some evidence of a dwelling for such Park dwellers if it existed. The Green Beret presence has been explained - nearby on training, able to continue the same type of training as would be necessary whilst also assisting in the search for a missing child in a case that caught the public attention, and at the request of the NPS. I know they don't get involved in SAR routinely, but how often would they be training for similar terrain in Vietnam, at the same time and next to an SAR mission that required exactly the skills they had and were training? On the flip side, if sending the Green Berets in is what the military does when it suspects foul play, does it follow that no other case could be considered as involving foul play given that the Green Berets weren't sent in? As I said, it's impossible to completely rule out kidnapping given that we don't know for certain what happened. But the obvious, probable answer is getting turned around, and some natural (weather or animal based) death befalling him. One of the SAR volunteers actually fell off a bridge and broke his arm and might well have been done for were he not surrounded by other SAR individuals, so the idea that it wouldn't be likely for a small boy in the dark, pouring rain and high winds doesn't stack. The case just doesn't need unfounded conspiracy heaped upon unfounded conspiracy to explain (unless of course there are books to sell).

Who among us hasn't gone insane, ran off to live in the woods, and lost the power of speech. Published in the Deseret News, Salt Lake City (UT) on December 11, 1883 and primary event mentioned in Bigfoot in New York and New England by Paul and Robert Bartholomew ; I don't recall them talking about the insane French soldier part.

'Sasquatch Calling Contest' held in Maine over the weekend kens5.comView the full article

This encounter is recounted in Bigfoot in New York and New England by Paul and Robert Bartholomew. It is unclear whether Tirademan posted in his original threadt; this account was published in the Deseret News, Salt Lake City (UT) on December 01, 1883.

Humans responsible? Like Russia?

What happens when a quiet hike near the Quabbin Reservoir turns into a confrontation with something impossible? In this chilling episode, we sit down with John Coster — songwriter, author, Harvard graduate — to hear the story of his life-changing encounters with a towering, white-haired Sasquatch in the forests of Western Massachusetts. From eerie silences and giant handprints on his car, to thunderous whistles in the woods, trees bent with impossible force, and even a massive boulder hurled into the lake — John’s story is one of the most interesting and compelling Bigfoot encounters ever recorded in New England. You’ll hear about sightings in Pelham, the hidden wilderness of the Quabbin, strange footprints near the Prescott Peninsula, and the long history of Sasquatch lore across Hampshire County and beyond down to Granville. Could these creatures still be haunting Massachusetts’ forgotten forests? Resources: Convergence: Encounters with an Impossible Being - buy link - https://amzn.to/3UERbNR (Amazon affiliate link helps support the podcast) https://www.johncostermusic.com/ 🗣️ Share Your Story Had a Bigfoot encounter or strange experience? Send it to bigfootsociety@gmail.com – your story might be featured on the show! 🎥 Watch & Subscribe on YouTube 🔴 Subscribe here → Bigfoot Society YouTube 💬 Leave a comment & let us know your thoughts! 📞 Leave a voicemail with your story → Speakpipe (Use multiple voicemails if needed) 👥 Share this episode → Watch & Share 🎧 More episodes → Podcast Playlist 🌲 Recommended: New Jersey Bigfoot Encounters 💥 Support the Show & Get Perks ✅ Join the community on Patreon – Become a Member ✅ Listen ad-free & early on YouTube – Join Here 📱 Let’s Connect Instagram: @bigfootsocietyTwitter: @bigfoot_societyTikTok: @bigfoot.society🧰 Tools & Partners I Use (Affiliate Links) These help support the show at no extra cost to you: Beam (Better Sleep): Try BeamWildgrain (Better Bread): Join HereSeed (Probiotics): Get SeedMedi-Share (Healthcare): Learn MoreLMNT (Electrolytes) Free Sample Pack with your first purchase! : Get LMNTOrganic and non-GMO groceries delivered for less http://thrv.me/uarEhS🎙️ Podcasting Tools: Repurpose.io: Try ItDescript: Sign UpStreamyard: Start RecordingRiverside.fm: Try Riverside🎧 My Audio Interface: View on Amazon ☕ Buy Me a Coffee – Support Here 🛍️ Grab Some Merch – Shop on Etsy 📬 Mailing Address: Bigfoot Society 125 E 1st St. #233 Earlham, IA 50072 📧 Business Inquiries: bigfootsociety@gmail.com Listen to the Podcast

If your kid was missing? And 5 miles away a scream was heard and a mangy man was seen packing something through the woods at roughly the same time frame? Would you want the FBI to dismiss the report or follow up on it? As a father and grandfather? I know which I would choose. Let’s back up for a moment. You say the mangy man was probably operating an illegal still or picking ginseng illegally. INSIDE A NATIONAL PARK? Why would criminals pack corn and yeast and sugar and copper tube and metal drums up some hiking trail in a National Park? And what would be the chances of not being seen packing all that in and then cooking it and then packing gallons and gallons of moonshine out? NIL. But Ok. So let’s say that’s plausible. My ranch almost touches Park service property and it doesn’t follow my experience with the park service. I would describe them as draconian. But whatever. Let’s just say this particular park has illegal activities going on inside its borders being operated by unscrupulous people. Do you think the Park Service is going to advertise this fact? Something doesn’t add up. Now? Now there is a kid missing. And the Park Service is sure that these unscrupulous bad actors have zero chance of anything to do with it? So much so that they dismiss the Key family testimony? I say actors in the plural because one man isn’t running an illegal still in a national forest by himself on foot. There is a completely plausible 3rd option. And that’s there are people who still live inside the park to this day. I live in the west. White people have not lived in the west nearly as long as they have lived in the east. Who and the heck knows what is inside that park. As for the Green Berets? I find it extremely bizarre they were part of this search at all. But if the park service has illegal stills and criminals inside the park? Or feral people still eeking out an existence on old family homesteads? Well that makes a lot more sense to me why you would want the Army involved. Who knows? Maybe Dennis is still alive? Sitting around a campfire in the woods with an adopted family. Maybe Bigfoot kidnapped him and ate him? Maybe a sneaky Bear or Cougar got him? Maybe he just wandered off and fell into a mine shaft? It’s why it’s a mystery. But are there strange things associated with this case? Absolutely IMHO. And there are others too.

The Smithsonian is exempt from NAGPRA. Lots of stuff has been “lost” from being sent to the Smithsonian.

Bob Gimlin Interview by Unknown Date, 1998 The X Creatures Episode – Bigfoot and Yeti Narrator – Mike Pengra Writer – Chris Packham [1] Available on Chesna’s Footage Room on YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWaDR4YDV_4.. This TV episode includes a very brief phone interview with Bob Gimlin in which he admits the possibility that he could have been the victim of a hoax, but - and the skeptics seem to leave out the "but" - it is a very bad idea to pull a hoax on a man armed with a 30.06 loaded with 180 grain bullets. Additionally, the episode includes actual video footage of John Green's interview of Bob Gimlin. Finally, the episode includes a "perfect" re-creation of the P-G film using a suit made by Optic Nerve Studios in 1998. Transcript 1998 Gimlin X Creatures Episode.docx

I don’t think it would ever make it to the fair without being sold off to some government agency.

Sorry it's taken a while to reply. Been busy and haven't had the time to properly research and set out my thoughts. I'm also sorry that this is going to be quite long. I wasn't aware that firefighters were involved in SAR missions, but clearly, in that light, you're right that that experience certainly counts. My issue with the Dennis Martin case is that much of what seems unusual only seems so if your information comes from David Paulides either directly (from the books/movies/videos) or indirectly (as the narrative that most people relay seems to incorporate his 'take' so that 'reporting' on websites seem to also incorporate them). If you look at actual newspaper reports, NPS reports and FBI Files and documents from the time, everything seems less unusual. Harold Key and his testimony is a perfect example. According to Paulides Dennis went missing at 3:30pm and that 'the same day sometime between 4:30 and 5:30pm' Harold Key heard a scream. This is important because Bill Martin and a Park Ranger supposedly hiked the 7-9 mile trail from Spence Field to the area Harold Key identified, taking 90 minutes to do so. The problem - Dennis went missing at 4:30pm (NPS chronology and the Incident report, as well as most contemporaneous newspaper reports confirm this) and Harold Key said he heard the scream 'it must have been around 4:30 in the afternoon. I know that it couldn't have been earlier than 3:30 or later than about 5:30' - Knoxville News Sentinel 7.21.1969. 'Key said that the scream 'a trouble scream' was heard about '4 or 4:30 in the afternoon' - Kingsport Times 7.22.1969 So the scream happened around the same time Dennis went missing, was just as, if not more likely to have happened before than after he went missing, and even taking the absolute latest time of 5:30pm would only leave and hour for someone to hike and carry Dennis a trail that had taken his father 90 minutes - his father, of course, would have been hiking as quickly as possible to prove a point, given his (fully understandable) desperation to get the FBI involved. Without changing the time of the disappearance (whether purposefully to suggest foul play, or a result of the shoddiest investigation/reporting of a fundamental fact possible, who can say?), the whole Harold Key testimony becomes irrelevant, exactly as the Rangers and FBI assessed. Remember also that Harold Key came forth on the July 20/21 1969. Green Beret help was requested June 15, and they had left by June 26. The Green Beret deployment couldn't be a result of Key's testimony because he wouldn't go on to tell anyone for well over a month after they were deployed and at a time when they'd left almost 4 weeks earlier. The idea of a man running and carrying something on his shoulder also seems to come from Paulides and Paulides only. He says that he interviewed Bill Martin (although Mrs Martin told Michael Bouchard later, after Bill Martin's death, that she had no recollection of any such interview) and that 'Mr Martin stated that the Keys had thought they saw a dark figured man running along a ridgeline carrying something on his shoulder.' So David Paulides says that Bill Martin said that Harold Key said there was a guy running with something on his shoulder. Only none of that appears in the NPS or FBI reports or crucially the newspaper reports. That means that Harold Key decided to come forward to try to help and either left out the most crucial part when talking to the press, or the press decided against publishing the most intriguing part of the story. Seems unlikely in the extreme. In addition to that, Bill Martin, who it seems to me from reviewing the FBI files and various newspapers, was of course desperate to get the FBI involved, didn't bother to mention to the newspapers, NPS or FBI that there was this evidence that would point toward a kidnapping and therefore probably get the FBI involved, exactly what he wanted? I don't buy it. There was a taped interview (see page 35 FBI documents) where Bill Martin 'speculated foul play ...but furnished no basis for this inference'. There's a letter in the NPS files (pg69) from Bill Martin to a Mr Hartsog complaining of not being informed of Mr Key's story before the press and before Mr Key showed the FBI and NPS where he was on that day. In it he states that he has spoken to Mr Key 'long distance several times. He complains that some descriptions of foliage and terrain, as reported by the newspaper, was incorrect. He did not complain that none of the NPS, FBI or newspapers made any mention of a person 'carrying something on his shoulder', which is again exactly the type of information that would likely have got him exactly what he was so desperate for. And those are his own written words. My take is that the man Harold Key saw was probably up to no good - moonshining as Harold Key thought, illegal ginseng harvesting like the later man who found bones, or something else. But it seems certain that it had nothing to do with Dennis Martin. That obviously doesn't mean that it's impossible that an off the gird mountain man didn't take Dennis because obviously nobody knows for certain. But it still seems infinitely more likely that a 6 year old got turned around in the forest, got lost and in the pouring rain and wind succumbed to hypothermia o, was attacked by an animal or fell down a crevice or into a stream. By all accounts 56 square miles had been searched by 6.23.1969. That equates to a circle with a radius of 4.22 miles. In 9 days. Meaning that the search assumed (or at least was not able to expand beyond) a possible distance of less than half a mile a day. As mentioned in a previous post, a conservative estimate of movement of 1mph would give a search area of over 450 square miles before the search had even really begun. Regarding the possibility of abduction by mountain men and Green Berets being deployed because of the threat, a few thoughts struck me while researching and thinking about this. If the Green Berets were deployed because of any such threat, it would require collusion between anyone at the NPS who had contributed to or seen the NPS chronology (so that it was faked), the FBI and anyone within it who knew about the threat of such mountain men and the military, including all those involved in deploying or searching with the Green Berets, with not one single person speaking out in over 50 years. Possible? Maybe. Probable? Would the authorities, knowing of the threat, allowed civilian volunteers to search the very areas that these mountain men were thought to predate on? In particular, if the authorities thought that a mountain man took a small child, would they allow the boy scouts to search remote places in the vicinity? Would the authorities send in the Green Berets to 'take out' a threat in an area that was being actively searched by hundreds if not thousands of people who might see or hear them doing exactly that? If they did suspect a Kari Swenson type situation, why hide it (in the official records that wouldn't be available to the public, not 'why wouldn't they announce it to the press at the time?')? My (very basic) look at that case doesn't suggest that they hid that case . If they turned out to be right they'd be heroes for finding the boy or giving the family closure (they could obviously come up with a 'they pulled their guns first' type story if necessary to cover for eliminating them if they found Dennis). If they thought so, but turned out wrong, who would care that they were extra precautious? If there are mountain men out there, off the grid, why would the authorities assume that they were murderous child snatchers? And wouldn't the search by thousands have found their dwellings? To me, although as I say, it isn't entirely impossible that Dennis was taken, any scenario other than him getting lost and falling foul to weather or animals, means making leaps in logic that aren't supported by any factual basis. It means saying 'everyone, the FBI, NPS, newspapers and military, is lying to you to persuade you that the very probably happened, whereas what actually happened was the very unlikely, for which I have no real proof'. Anyway, that's my 2 cents/pence, an eye opener for me only in the sense that I don't feel I have to look much further into the M411, given that the case that is often held as the flag bearer for the theory falls apart as soon as you start checking things for yourself.

^^^ Thanks wiiawiwb. Despite breaking an arm 2 miles into the woods, my wife and I have not carried any type of locator even though many hikes in the Adirondacks and Catskills have pockets of no cell service. We're going up to Banff shortly and the first thing I read was "don't expect to have any cell service." I went with a Zoleo as an emergency communication system in the event of something bad - whether it be a hobbling twisted ankle that requires more assistance than my wife can provide or being et by a 1,000 grizzly bear. My wife is trained on using it, so if one of us goes down, the other one is the communicator. If it's really bad (like the recent rock slide in Banff that killed a few hikers), well xin loi.

I’m Jim Peters, half of the Squatchers. My fascination with Bigfoot sparked while hiking in the Shawnee National Forest with a friend. Strange sounds, odd lights, and unexplained sightings turned my curiosity into a passion for exploring the Sasquatch mystery.

It would help if you can describe that type of potential emergency you are concerned about. For example, let's say are concerned if you were to fall and break a leg or twist an ankle and be physically unable to transport yourself out. You're not imminitely in danger but need help. A satellite communicator such as Garmin or Zoleo works perfectly. You can describe by text your inability to extract yourself and a family member or friend could come to help you out or summon SAR if necessary. If, however, you are concerned with something catastrophic, such as a heart attack, venomous snake bite, or severe laceration where time is of the essence, I'd suggest also having a PLB ( personal locator beacon). I have both and always carry them. In a catastropic event, you may be close to unconciousness and may be unable to text a message. In that case, you want able able to press a button and know the cavalry is on its way. A PLB is more reliable for that than a satellite-messenger device, in my opinion. By having both, you can reach SAR using the PLB and then text the nature of your problem with the Garmin/Zoleo. That would enormously benefical so SAR is apprised of the nature of your problem. I have preset messages on my Garmin that briefly describe the nature of the problem. For example, one message on my Garmin says, "I've been bitten by a venomous snake, may lose consciousness and have alerted SAR on my PLB." That way, they know the problem, they know the PLB alert has been activated and can coordinate things properly. Here is someone who has lots of valuable information regarding communicator devices and this video is where I got the idea to coordinate things between a PLB and Garmin device. I've started the video at the end in the Recommendations" section.

Just a short blurb, so I included the following article, which should allow members to befuddle their children, grandchildren, nieces, and nephews for awhile. Published in The Ogden (UT) Standard-Examiner on June 08, 1883.

When I first saw Tirademan's mention of this incident in the archives, I thought he meant a town or city named Armenia in the U.S. state of Georgia. He apparently meant the Transcaucasus, that mountainous isthmus that contains the present day countries of Armenia and Georgia. I hope to find a more fulsome article; if so, I will publish it here. For now, here is an article from The Silver Reef (UT) Miner published on September 03, 1881.

Published in The Deseret News, Salt Lake City (UT) on June 07, 1873. One has to wonder how they got their news from Florida.

What happens when everyday people step into the woods and come face-to-face with something they can’t explain? In this raw and unfiltered episode of the Bigfoot Society podcast, host Jeremiah Byron shares a chilling collection of first-hand encounters pulled from live call-ins across the United States and beyond. From a seven-foot figure peering around a house near Waitt’s Mountain outside Boston… to whistled replies in the Texas wilderness… to rocks hurled in Alabama’s backcountry… and even a trail camera capture in the forests of British Columbia — each account pushes the boundary between folklore and terrifying reality. You’ll hear stories from Malden, Walpole, Tamworth, Bankhead National Forest, Oakmulgee WMA, and the Willamette National Forest of Oregon, including moments where glowing eyes, massive footprints, and even towering twenty-foot figures left witnesses shaken to their core. More than just campfire stories, these testimonies explore the violent, unpredictable, and deeply mysterious side of Sasquatch encounters — and what happens when the unknown decides to show itself. 🗣️ Share Your Story Had a Bigfoot encounter or strange experience? Send it to bigfootsociety@gmail.com – your story might be featured on the show! 🎥 Watch & Subscribe on YouTube 🔴 Subscribe here → Bigfoot Society YouTube 💬 Leave a comment & let us know your thoughts! 📞 Leave a voicemail with your story → Speakpipe (Use multiple voicemails if needed) 👥 Share this episode → Watch & Share 🎧 More episodes → Podcast Playlist 🌲 Recommended: New Jersey Bigfoot Encounters 💥 Support the Show & Get Perks ✅ Join the community on Patreon – Become a Member ✅ Listen ad-free & early on YouTube – Join Here 📱 Let’s Connect Instagram: @bigfootsocietyTwitter: @bigfoot_societyTikTok: @bigfoot.society🧰 Tools & Partners I Use (Affiliate Links) These help support the show at no extra cost to you: Beam (Better Sleep): Try BeamWildgrain (Better Bread): Join HereSeed (Probiotics): Get SeedMedi-Share (Healthcare): Learn MoreLMNT (Electrolytes) Free Sample Pack with your first purchase! : Get LMNTOrganic and non-GMO groceries delivered for less http://thrv.me/uarEhS🎙️ Podcasting Tools: Repurpose.io: Try ItDescript: Sign UpStreamyard: Start RecordingRiverside.fm: Try Riverside🎧 My Audio Interface: View on Amazon ☕ Buy Me a Coffee – Support Here 🛍️ Grab Some Merch – Shop on Etsy 📬 Mailing Address: Bigfoot Society 125 E 1st St. #233 Earlham, IA 50072 📧 Business Inquiries: bigfootsociety@gmail.com Listen to the Podcast

Cliff Barackman and James "Bobo" Fay welcome BFRO founder and Finding Bigfoot co-star Matt Moneymaker back for the third time! Matt discusses recent anomalous light activity during sasquatch expeditions, a sighting of multiple sasquatches in Washington, a new trail camera photo from Missouri, and much more! Check out the BFRO's website and official Facebook group. Start your free online visit with Hims today at http://hims.com/beyond Sign up for our weekly bonus podcast "Beyond Bigfoot & Beyond" and ad-free episodes! Get your official "Bigfoot & Beyond: Enter The Sasquatch" shirt!Listen to the Podcast

No worries. I don’t rule Bigfoot out. But Occam’s razor would favor a human as being responsible. But I think the Key family testimony is alarming and the lynchpin to the case. I really wish I could find more just about what they saw.

^^ All good. Not saying that there aren't unusual aspects, but Bigfoot would be about #37 on my list of explanations. Also, when I started writing, I was in a "high hover" ready to spit vinegar and chicklets on everything. I calmed myself down as I typed! Also wanted to throw in that there's a difference between missing children who get lost in the city or abducted by estranged parents, etc., and kids/young adults that go missing in the woods. In eastern New York, there are at least 2 20-year-old cases of adults missing in relatively confined areas who have never been found. One of these got featured in the first 4-1-1- book. In another case a missing teenager was recovered (found deceased) 2-3 months after his disappearance. And in yet another case, a missing adult was found about six months after his disappearance in an area that had been searched by drones, yet when the snow melted and the leaves blew away six months later, there he was. These four cases were all in relatively tiny areas; finding a missing adult in the woods is hard, finding a missing child is that much harder.