All Activity

There is a heck of alot more to evidence that Standing is a Con man than Paulides??? Paulides is simply reporting on missing persons cases on public lands. And the government cover up. Standing wants the Canadian government to recognize Bigfoot as a real species based on a couple of photos! Errmm… muppets!🤷🏻‍♂️ This best thing our community can do is ONLY accept physical evidence. But if Paulides is a con man? Standing IS Bernie Madoff! 🤨

Government silence: There was an old skit from Saturday Night Live back in the 1970s where President Carter becomes giant from a Pepsi spill on the control panel at a nuclear energy factory. Once President Carter becomes nearly 100Ft tall (from radiation poisoning) reporters ask the government questions. Here is the governments answer: Female Reporter #1: Yes, is it true that the president is 100 feet tall? Ross Denton: Nooooo! Absolutely not! Male reporter #3: Is the president 90 feet tall? Ross Denton: No comment. OK, maybe a non- answer IS an answer after all. :-)

Sasquatch is real. The U.S. Forest Service and other branches of government know it, and the reason they don’t openly acknowledge it has little to do with logging, despite what some people believe. The real reason for silence runs much deeper—and it would be profoundly destabilizing if the truth were admitted. Why Logging Isn’t the Issue Some argue that confirming Sasquatch would force vast tracts of forest to be shut down for conservation, crippling logging operations. That explanation is convenient, but it misses the bigger picture. In reality, logging protections would be a small policy change compared to the tectonic shock society would experience if we fully grasped what Sasquatch actually represents. Beyond Human Understanding These beings are not just another undiscovered primate. Witness accounts and field evidence suggest that Sasquatch possess abilities that challenge our most basic assumptions about physics, biology, and even consciousness. They seem able to evade detection far too effectively for their size, moving with speed and silence no known mammal can match. Some encounters describe shifts in perception, time distortions, and sudden feelings of disorientation—all phenomena that defy current science. If verified, this would mean that Sasquatch has access to dimensions of reality we don’t yet understand. Imagine what it would do to: Physics: Our current models of matter, energy, and perception would have to be rewritten. The ripple effects on technology and weaponry would be enormous. Biology: Human beings would no longer sit comfortably atop the evolutionary narrative. Sasquatch would represent a parallel lineage with capabilities we can’t reproduce. Religion & Philosophy: Entire belief systems would be shaken. Proof of a being that interacts with the physical world in ways beyond comprehension would challenge everything from creation stories to our sense of what it means to be human. The Detriment of Disclosure Society depends on consensus reality—shared rules about how the world works. Admitting that a living species can bend or bypass those rules would destabilize public trust in science, government, and religion simultaneously. Scientific institutions would lose credibility overnight as the limits of their models were exposed. Religious communities would fracture between those who embrace Sasquatch as divine evidence and those who reject it as heresy. Governments would be inundated with panic, conspiracy, and demands for control of a phenomenon they themselves don’t fully understand. Markets would reel as people scrambled to exploit or weaponize knowledge of Sasquatch’s abilities. The secrecy, then, isn’t about protecting loggers. It’s about protecting society from truths we may not be ready to process. Until our scientific and cultural frameworks evolve to handle the existence of such beings, silence is the safer path. There is no other logical explanation. Anyone claiming its about logging is quite simply not ready to go as deep as this subject requires.

Well, until your oversize graphic, you weren't posting in all-caps.

I admit I have not been studying this phenomenon for as long as some. Its been about 8 years of rather focused interest on my part. I have seen the numerous anti-Standing posts, but have yet to see anything that proves him to be a fraud. If there is some sacred knowledge that the more informed have, I would be more than happy to review it.

Conjecture works well in a world of conjecture.

^^^^^^^^^^ < SILENCE > Post Script: Am I angry? No, but I'm pretty frustrated..........

Who speaks for "the government"? When we say, "The government says you have to be 18 or over to vote" we can go to a specific area of the government and confirm this position. There is even overlap of various agencies holding this position. Other departments would not be expected to have any position. If I was to look up the issue: AGE TO VOTE I would go to the constitution, the local courthouse, ask a government employee involved in that department, and so on. They could even give me a paper with a written statement on the requirements to vote. That would be the accurate position of the government. We could ask "How old do you have to be to vote in the USA" or "Can a 12-year-old vote in city state or federal elections?" We can find an official position to address this. All government wouldn't care but those specific departments concerned on the matter would care. They would directly address the issue with an official position. With Bigfoot I would ask how anyone would know what the government's official position is. We would first need to know what part of the government to seek. I doubt the IRS or the local property tax assessor would be places to start. Once we defined where the proper place then we would ask what is their official position? Can anyone please provide an OFFICIAL GOVENEMRNT POSITON on Bigfoot and post it on this thread? If there is one, it should be easy. <Post the official government position on Bigfoot here>

check on if it is AI or not here: https://wasitai.com/

Are you angry?

show the proof or otherwise its just conjecture. this was an interesting watch:

Forums member Tirademan found several clippings about the wild man of Arkansas in 1846, 1851, and 1856; these were posted by Gigantor in the Tirademan archives. This article was published in the Cleveland (OH) Evening Post on May 15, 1852. The witnesses in this account dispute the details provided by earlier witnesses.

This. The amount of evidence accumulated over the past 70 years is "overwhelming", "convincing", "compelling", "persuasive", and "conclusive" enough to warrant the U.S. government to conduct its very first official investigation into the phenomenon. If they need help, they can first interview some of the local law enforcement authorities.........like these sheriff's deputies: http://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=76973

THE SCIENCE COMMUNITY HAS ALREADY STUDIED BIGFOOT AND IN MY OPINION THEY HAVE PROVEN ITS EXISTENCE WITH FOOTPRINTS, EYEWITNESSES, HAIR, AND VIDEO EVIDENCE. I UNDERSTAND THAT SCIENCE REQUIRES LIVING SPECIMEN OR A DECEASED BIGFOOT BEFORE IT WILL GIVE THE STAMP OF APPROVAL DESIGNATING IT AS A PROVEN ANIMAL. I BELIEVE THAT ENOUGH EVIDENCE HAS BEEN COLLECTED AND THE FOREST SERVICE SHOULD BE ASSISTING SCIENCE TO PROVE THE EXISTENCE OF BIGFOOT. NOW THE FOREST SERVICE IS MOST LIKELY DRAGGING ITS FEET BECAUSE IT FEARS THAT BIGFOOT WILL BE LABELED AS AN ENDANGERED SPECIES WHICH COULD DEVASTATE THE LUMBER INDUSTRY. AGAIN I DON'T BELIEVE THAT BIGFOOT IS IN DANGERED BY THE LOGGING INDUSTRY SINCE DEAR OR BROUGHT IN AFTER FORCE CLEAR CUTTING AND BIGFOOT FEEDS ON THE DEER. MIB SAID: Not truly disagreeing but I'd say it slightly differently. By way of analogy, do you recall when someone characterized the Ketchum study as "not even wrong"? I see the fed gov't "official" response as similar to that. In other words, not only do they not treat bigfoot as real, I don't think they take the question of bigfoot as a serious topic .. at least not officially. Certainly we have heard some INDIVIDUALS from fed gov't deny existence; likewise, we've heard a very very few say bigfoot is real, but none speak with agency authority, rather, they speak as individual people who happen to draw a gov't paycheck. I'M NOT SURE WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT IN REGARDS TO THE KETCHUM STUDY. YES I AGREE WITH YOU ABOUT THE GOVERNMENT NOT STATING THAT BIGFOOT IS REAL, BUT WE DON'T KNOW IF FOREST SERVICE WILDLIFE BIOLOGISTS WORKING FOR THE GOVERNMENT ARE SECRETLY STUDYING BIGFOOT AND COLLECTING EVIDENCE IN CASE IT BECOMES A PUBLIC ISSUE AND WHETHER OR NOT BIGFOOT SHOULD EVEN BE RECOGNIZED. I CAN'T BELIEVE THE FOREST SERVICE AT THE TOP LEVELS HAS NOT BEEN RESEARCHING BIGFOOT AND COLLECTING EVIDENCE BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO BE EVENTUALLY BROUGHT TO THE FOREFRONT AND THE FOREST SERVICE WILL HAVE TO DEAL WITH IT.

Not truly disagreeing but I'd say it slightly differently. By way of analogy, do you recall when someone characterized the Ketchum study as "not even wrong"? I see the fed gov't "official" response as similar to that. In other words, not only do they not treat bigfoot as real, I don't think they take the question of bigfoot as a serious topic .. at least not officially. Certainly we have heard some INDIVIDUALS from fed gov't deny existence; likewise, we've heard a very very few say bigfoot is real, but none speak with agency authority, rather, they speak as individual people who happen to draw a gov't paycheck.

I think it's more a "position" than "opinion". I opine that it's the other way around: Science will go where the government is. That's because government has the money, and Science (like everybody else) wants some. Government likes whiz-bang weapons, so Science produces them, and they get paid for it........handsomely.

This. We will be inundated with this stuff. Imagery has become counter-productive.

Yep. Unless of course one is forgiving the many hoaxes. I believe that is called naive. The Muppets is the most laughable. Of course if one takes the subject serious probably best to move on from any and everything Standing.

Published in The Evening Post, Cleveland (OH) on July 26, 1847, reporting events of about two weeks earlier in Canada. No mention of this wild man growing a coat of fur during his years in the wilderness, but you never know.

My Bigfoot Life review – teen cryptozoologist’s Sasquatch search is an uplifting odyssey The GuardianView the full article

Legend of Bigfoot extends to the Midwest AgUpdateView the full article

What happens when childhood games in a Georgia neighborhood turn into nightly standoffs with something not human — something watching from the treeline, glowing eyes like flashlights piercing the dark? In this gripping episode of Bigfoot Society, Jeremiah Byron sits down with witnesses who grew up surrounded by a family of Sasquatch near Ellenwood, Georgia, only yards from a military base and a trash-filled creek. From red-eyed window peepers to a creature running 100 yards in six steps, to deer frozen in a strange circle before being struck down — this episode is packed with terrifying, violent, and unexplainable encounters. You’ll also hear about military base sightings at Fort Benning, mysterious activity in Oregon’s Willamette Pass, and a chilling roadside encounter in Northern California’s Plumas National Forest. Whether it’s landfills crawling with giants or whoops echoing through the mountains, these are stories you’ll never forget. 🗣️ Share Your Story Had a Bigfoot encounter or strange experience? Send it to bigfootsociety@gmail.com – your story might be featured on the show! 🎥 Watch & Subscribe on YouTube 🔴 Subscribe here → Bigfoot Society YouTube 💬 Leave a comment & let us know your thoughts! 📞 Leave a voicemail with your story → Speakpipe (Use multiple voicemails if needed) 👥 Share this episode → Watch & Share 🎧 More episodes → Podcast Playlist 🌲 Recommended: New Jersey Bigfoot Encounters 💥 Support the Show & Get Perks ✅ Join the community on Supercast – Become a Member ✅ Listen ad-free & early on YouTube – Join Here 📱 Let’s Connect Instagram: @bigfootsocietyTwitter: @bigfoot_societyTikTok: @bigfoot.society🧰 Tools & Partners I Use (Affiliate Links) These help support the show at no extra cost to you: Beam (Better Sleep): Try BeamWildgrain (Better Bread): Join HereSeed (Probiotics): Get SeedMedi-Share (Healthcare): Learn MoreLMNT (Electrolytes) Free Sample Pack with your first purchase! : Get LMNTOrganic and non-GMO groceries delivered for less http://thrv.me/uarEhS🎙️ Podcasting Tools: Repurpose.io: Try ItDescript: Sign UpStreamyard: Start RecordingRiverside.fm: Try Riverside🎧 My Audio Interface: View on Amazon ☕ Buy Me a Coffee – Support Here 🛍️ Grab Some Merch – Shop on Etsy 📬 Mailing Address: Bigfoot Society 125 E 1st St. #233 Earlham, IA 50072 📧 Business Inquiries: bigfootsociety@gmail.com Listen to the Podcast

The Bigfoot looks like those cutout signs that people put up in their yards sometimes, just for a little conversation.

Cliff Barackman, James "Bobo" Fay, and Matt Pruitt answer your questions in this new Q&A episode! If you would like to submit a question for a future Q&A episode, please use the contact form or voicemail link HERE. Start your free online visit with Hims today at http://hims.com/beyond New York Bigfoot Conference (October 3-4) CryptidCon (Kentucky, November 22-23) Sign up for our weekly bonus podcast "Beyond Bigfoot & Beyond" and ad-free episodes! Get your official "Bigfoot & Beyond: Enter The Sasquatch" shirt!Listen to the Podcast

I’ll be Mr Boring: the “Federal Government “ has an opinion equal to the opinion of the science community in general. That opinion is ——->. Bigfoot is not yet a proven creature. if the science community in general -by a large consensus- felt differently the government would go where the science is. It’s no coincidence the government essentially says Bigfoot has not been proven to exist mirroring the science consensus its not more complicated than that.