norseman Posted October 16, 2024 Admin Author Posted October 16, 2024 1 hour ago, NorCalWitness said: I went camping with Eli from Small Town Monsters and talked with him about the nest site. He said that its impossible to appreciate them from film, but he tried his best to present them. He said they are massive and amazing. Thats cool. I hope something tangible comes out of people finding these nesting sites. The Expedition Bigfoot nesting site doesn’t look used though. Probably slim pickings for DNA.
norseman Posted March 14 Admin Author Posted March 14 Season six episode 8. They got a blood sample. 🤞Hopefully it’s not all Hollywood tricks. ***If any Expedition Bigfoot cast or crew are reading this?*** You guys have got to loose the lights! I am a hunter. Predators can be hunted with a red light. They can’t see it. But they can see white light. But any PRIMATE has trichromatic vision. Assuming Bigfoot is a primate, like humans? We can see red light as well as white light. And assuming Bigfoot is hominid smart? You guys are easily avoidable in the woods. I know you’re filming a TV show. But film during the day. Thermals work during the day. At night? You should switch to night vision only or thermal. I don’t see any attempt by the team to mask their presence. If you absolutely must use a light at night? Use a red light to save your own night vision and throw a poncho over your head as to not give your position away. 1
Dubman Posted March 14 Posted March 14 I'm with you on this one Norseman. I annoys and frustrates me when I see them crashing through the woods with no attempt to be quiet and stealthy, as well as flashing lights all over the place. Maybe none of them have hunting experience. It's almost like they are trying to scare them away. The thermals they use have screens that shine back on their faces, surely they can afford a proper thermal spotter that has a small eye piece that will only emit a narrow beam back on them. The one I use is better than theirs. The images they get don't seem that clear. I can identify foxes, rabbits and hares, easily within a couple of hundred yards. Something as big as Sasquatch should easily show up. In theory, I know and I am in the UK, so not much chance of trying my spotter on a Sasquatch.
7.62 Posted March 14 Posted March 14 On 10/16/2024 at 1:40 PM, norseman said: Thats cool. I hope something tangible comes out of people finding these nesting sites. The Expedition Bigfoot nesting site doesn’t look used though. Probably slim pickings for DNA. What do you think of that clip Russ took ? just a hiker or a bigfoot ?
7.62 Posted March 14 Posted March 14 (edited) 2 hours ago, Dubman said: I'm with you on this one Norseman. I annoys and frustrates me when I see them crashing through the woods with no attempt to be quiet and stealthy, as well as flashing lights all over the place. Maybe none of them have hunting experience. It's almost like they are trying to scare them away. The thermals they use have screens that shine back on their faces, surely they can afford a proper thermal spotter that has a small eye piece that will only emit a narrow beam back on them. The one I use is better than theirs. The images they get don't seem that clear. I can identify foxes, rabbits and hares, easily within a couple of hundred yards. Something as big as Sasquatch should easily show up. In theory, I know and I am in the UK, so not much chance of trying my spotter on a Sasquatch. I think the reason is because its pointless anyways and they know it but they have a reality TV show to film with a camera crew and make up artists included in tow . Thermal will never be enough because look at through all the 6 seasons how many times they filmed a blob of something then they say where did it go it's gone!! with scary music. If they could actually get some clear day time footage it would go a long way at least in filming something that would make national news . Would it be proof? maybe not but it would be a lot better than thermal blob spots which they always seem to have . Edited March 14 by 7.62
norseman Posted March 14 Admin Author Posted March 14 41 minutes ago, 7.62 said: What do you think of that clip Russ took ? just a hiker or a bigfoot ? It looked black. So did the one last year in Cali. But without physical proof?🤷♂️ Hopefully this blood sample sheds some light. But as much evidence as they are supposedly finding? The nests, the footprints, the hair, the blood? If nothing conclusive comes of it? Then they have proven my position right. You’re gonna need a dead body. And this isn’t plucking Lemurs out of tall bushes. Get after it. Or? It’s all baloney.
7.62 Posted March 15 Posted March 15 Yeah Russ needs to start packing a scoped rifle instead of all the gear he carries in that 75 pound pack . 1
norseman Posted March 15 Admin Author Posted March 15 40 minutes ago, 7.62 said: Yeah Russ needs to start packing a scoped rifle instead of all the gear he carries in that 75 pound pack . He would have bagged one last year!👍 1
wiiawiwb Posted March 15 Posted March 15 The noise level, the lights, and using a walkie-talkie with a loud volume level are all ridiculous, in my opinion. I wish they spent a few minutes magnifying the dark object walking away which they want us to believe is a saquatch. I'd also like to see the magnified image played in super-slow motion. If the video has the goods, wouldn't it seem they would announce it to the world? In the alternative, if the video is even a maybe, I am surprised they didn't spend more time with it. When I'm in the woods, I use a 4Seven Quark mini flashlight in the 3-lumen mode. Just enough to barely see things you need to get your hands on. It keeps the light so low it wouldn't likely be detected at a distance. Why not use whispers rather than normal talk volume? 1 2
Recommended Posts