Backdoc Posted January 13 Author Posted January 13 DNA Brainteaser: Say there is a Bigfoot encounter where some scared citizen shoots at Bigfoot just before sunrise. He calls the cops because he is not sure if it was Bigfoot or a prowler. The cops show up quickly and they find blood, 15 inch footprint sin the mud, and a few clumps of hair in the rose bushes where the Bigfoot “prowler” ran off to the woods. Q: Under this dream scenario what DNA could be expected from… -The near-fresh blood? -The footprints? -The hair sample? What would we expect it would show? Would there be a way -apart from the crime lab doing the gathering -to trust the “scene” would not be contaminated by human presence?
Huntster Posted January 13 Posted January 13 56 minutes ago, Backdoc said: DNA Brainteaser: Say there is a Bigfoot encounter where some scared citizen shoots at Bigfoot just before sunrise. He calls the cops because he is not sure if it was Bigfoot or a prowler. The cops show up quickly and they find blood, 15 inch footprint sin the mud, and a few clumps of hair in the rose bushes where the Bigfoot “prowler” ran off to the woods. Q: Under this dream scenario what DNA could be expected from… -The near-fresh blood? -The footprints? -The hair sample? What would we expect it would show? Would there be a way -apart from the crime lab doing the gathering -to trust the “scene” would not be contaminated by human presence? It really wouldn't matter what the DNA revealed. The police/DA have it, and they will keep it..................secret............... 1
norseman Posted January 13 Admin Posted January 13 31 minutes ago, Huntster said: It really wouldn't matter what the DNA revealed. The police/DA have it, and they will keep it..................secret............... This post will self detonate in 5…..4…..3….. 1
Trogluddite Posted January 13 Posted January 13 MIB (the group, not our comrade in arms) have been dispatched to neuralize all of you.... 1
bipedalist Posted January 13 BFF Patron Posted January 13 (edited) Cops can't find cloaked DNA y'all! He** double hockey sticks, even the CIA is still asking for Dr. J's help with that one! Edited January 13 by bipedalist
night912 Posted April 9 Posted April 9 On 8/20/2024 at 1:24 PM, Backdoc said: Subject: Bigfoot DNA Ok. I'll admit it. I find this DNA thing confusing or at least all over the map. I get the science and the uniqueness of what it means. I read in the news how scientists studying sewer water can tell us there is some uptick in the Covid or Polo Cases in some Zip Code. Good enough. We know DNA can tell us if we are the father of the child or if it's the mail man. What about Bigfoot? What is the best DNA evidence supporting the fact Bigfoot might exist or does exist? I saw a Bigfoot expert on some YouTube video where the guy essentially said "any sample claiming DNA evidence of Bigfoot might be suspect unless [he] knew exactly how it was collected" or he might assume human contamination. Is there any hope of finding Bigfoot DNA should Bigfoot exist? I can understand maybe some stool sample or blood sample should we be lucky enough to have that. Could a person take DNA out of a stream and confirm Grizzly bears in the area? If so, why not Bigfoot? Can we even know what Bigfoot's DNA is even supposed to look like? It would seem DNA has a great chance to prove bigfoot exists instead of hoping for the next modern PGF. Where is the DNA evidence? What are the weaknesses of any claimed evidence? There's a misconception about the DNA being contaminated. A lot of people think that the contamination is just caused by the people doing the tests. But the real concern is the contamination from the person that collected the samples. On 8/20/2024 at 1:24 PM, Backdoc said: Subject: Bigfoot DNA Ok. I'll admit it. I find this DNA thing confusing or at least all over the map. I get the science and the uniqueness of what it means. I read in the news how scientists studying sewer water can tell us there is some uptick in the Covid or Polo Cases in some Zip Code. Good enough. We know DNA can tell us if we are the father of the child or if it's the mail man. What about Bigfoot? What is the best DNA evidence supporting the fact Bigfoot might exist or does exist? I saw a Bigfoot expert on some YouTube video where the guy essentially said "any sample claiming DNA evidence of Bigfoot might be suspect unless [he] knew exactly how it was collected" or he might assume human contamination. Is there any hope of finding Bigfoot DNA should Bigfoot exist? I can understand maybe some stool sample or blood sample should we be lucky enough to have that. Could a person take DNA out of a stream and confirm Grizzly bears in the area? If so, why not Bigfoot? Can we even know what Bigfoot's DNA is even supposed to look like? It would seem DNA has a great chance to prove bigfoot exists instead of hoping for the next modern PGF. Where is the DNA evidence? What are the weaknesses of any claimed evidence? There's a misconception about the DNA being contaminated. A lot of people think that the contamination is just caused by the people doing the tests. But the real concern is the contamination from the person that collected the samples.
Recommended Posts