Huntster Posted yesterday at 02:43 PM Posted yesterday at 02:43 PM 8 minutes ago, Huntster said: ..........I wonder how it could have gone if the guy wasn't terrified and used more welcoming body language?......... I recall another story, again I think from Peter Byrne (therefore, in a book, not a researchable internet source) where a sasquatch was hanging out near a camp for disabled kids somewhere in south-central BC. Eventually, a camp administrator, counselor, or employee (I can't remember which) sat still by a campfire one night as the sasquatch approached to within a few feet. The guy wasn't even armed. I have no doubt whatsoever that these creatures could respond well to body language, especially the females. 1 1
norseman Posted yesterday at 04:29 PM Admin Posted yesterday at 04:29 PM 1 hour ago, Huntster said: I recall another story, again I think from Peter Byrne (therefore, in a book, not a researchable internet source) where a sasquatch was hanging out near a camp for disabled kids somewhere in south-central BC. Eventually, a camp administrator, counselor, or employee (I can't remember which) sat still by a campfire one night as the sasquatch approached to within a few feet. The guy wasn't even armed. I have no doubt whatsoever that these creatures could respond well to body language, especially the females. Death by Snu Snu 1
Madison5716 Posted yesterday at 04:45 PM Posted yesterday at 04:45 PM 2 hours ago, Huntster said: Eventually, a camp administrator, counselor, or employee (I can't remember which) sat still by a campfire one night as the sasquatch approached to within a few feet. That's gutsy. Or stupid.
Huntster Posted yesterday at 07:54 PM Posted yesterday at 07:54 PM 3 hours ago, Madison5716 said: That's gutsy. Or stupid. Since he wasn't killed, it was gutsy. Had he been killed, it would have been stupid. I might have been able to do it with a handgun in my hand.
norseman Posted yesterday at 08:34 PM Admin Posted yesterday at 08:34 PM 40 minutes ago, Huntster said: Since he wasn't killed, it was gutsy. Had he been killed, it would have been stupid. I might have been able to do it with a handgun in my hand. I am shooting. 1
Huntster Posted yesterday at 09:31 PM Posted yesterday at 09:31 PM 54 minutes ago, norseman said: I am shooting. If it's a she, I'll give her a chance to be nice. If it's a he, I'm shooting. If neither he/she or I know the gender, I'm definitely shooting........ 1
Huntster Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago On 9/27/2025 at 3:34 PM, Huntster said: ........Better to just leave them alone, just like my Daddy said so long ago............. https://youtu.be/0uVbQQ1yeCg?si=bZv3EXfxinS1FJgO YouTube wouldn't even allow the video to embed. 1
norseman Posted 19 hours ago Admin Posted 19 hours ago 37 minutes ago, Huntster said: https://youtu.be/0uVbQQ1yeCg?si=bZv3EXfxinS1FJgO YouTube wouldn't even allow the video to embed. That tree would have made crummy 2x4s!🤷♂️ 1
Huntster Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 1 hour ago, norseman said: That tree would have made crummy 2x4s!🤷♂️ Super-duper hard wood, and really gnarly.
Huntster Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 1 hour ago, norseman said: That tree would have made crummy 2x4s!🤷♂️ Super-duper hard wood, and really gnarly. But you aren't going to find it, anyway. The gub'mint is hiding it in plain sight............
Backdoc Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago (edited) Survivorman or whomever search for Sasquatch. We need to keep in mind they may actually FIND Sasquatch. This leads to another Q. Once something is out in the public domain it becomes nearly FREE as social media exist to help it spread like wildfire. When it isn't free it is still near impossible for the owner of the legal rights to get the Geni back in the bottle. (hello 1990s/2000s Napster) If Les or someone actually got a Home Run video of Bigfoot what should be the next step. Sell it as a TV special? Release it on the internet? Could you really cash in? It would seem cashing in would require some way to limit access or control the images. Say Les had a modern PGF event. The video is top notch. The trackway is fully documented. That would have a value beyond just the historic value. In 1967 America we know Roger Patterson only had a few venues to sell or cash in on Bigfoot. To see it the public had to buy it. To see it one TV you had no VCR to record it. Les may look for Bigfoot. What if he finds Bigfoot? Then what? Edited 5 hours ago by Backdoc
norseman Posted 4 hours ago Admin Posted 4 hours ago 54 minutes ago, Backdoc said: Survivorman or whomever search for Sasquatch. We need to keep in mind they may actually FIND Sasquatch. This leads to another Q. Once something is out in the public domain it becomes nearly FREE as social media exist to help it spread like wildfire. When it isn't free it is still near impossible for the owner of the legal rights to get the Geni back in the bottle. (hello 1990s/2000s Napster) If Les or someone actually got a Home Run video of Bigfoot what should be the next step. Sell it as a TV special? Release it on the internet? Could you really cash in? It would seem cashing in would require some way to limit access or control the images. Say Les had a modern PGF event. The video is top notch. The trackway is fully documented. That would have a value beyond just the historic value. In 1967 America we know Roger Patterson only had a few venues to sell or cash in on Bigfoot. To see it the public had to buy it. To see it one TV you had no VCR to record it. Les may look for Bigfoot. What if he finds Bigfoot? Then what? It will have five minutes of fame before it hits the trash heap of Bigfoot videos experts regard as hoaxes. Only physical evidence will do.
Backdoc Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 3 hours ago, norseman said: It will have five minutes of fame before it hits the trash heap of Bigfoot videos experts regard as hoaxes. I think a Home Run level video would convince most especially in the hands of someone they respected. 3 hours ago, norseman said: Only physical evidence will do. Imagine some scenario with Les or someone hunting for Bigfoot GETS that physical evidence. I assume we are talking about a body as the physical evidence.
norseman Posted 58 minutes ago Admin Posted 58 minutes ago 22 minutes ago, Backdoc said: I think a Home Run level video would convince most especially in the hands of someone they respected. Imagine some scenario with Les or someone hunting for Bigfoot GETS that physical evidence. I assume we are talking about a body as the physical evidence. Convince science? No. Flesh, bone, blood, saliva, etc
NorCalWitness Posted 30 minutes ago Author Posted 30 minutes ago 25 minutes ago, norseman said: Convince science? No. Flesh, bone, blood, saliva, etc As you've already pointed out, the government won't allow this to come out. Imagine the logistics that go into getting a body out to the public. It's pretty much impossible if the government doesn't want it out. There is already plenty of hair samples that have been collected and submitted to science. It's done nothing. You are correct when you say that a video will just be called a hoax by people. No matter the quality.
Recommended Posts