bipedalist Posted Sunday at 10:37 PM BFF Patron Posted Sunday at 10:37 PM I'm sure @Darby Orcutt would be happy to send you a prepaid mailer! Good luck!
Backdoc Posted yesterday at 03:13 AM Posted yesterday at 03:13 AM (edited) A broken bone is universally understood on an X-ray. Until the DNA results for Bigfoot could be universally understood and agreed to, it almost seems like a useless tool. Useful for paternity and so ion but surprisingly limited for Bigfoot study. Edited yesterday at 03:14 AM by Backdoc
Huntster Posted yesterday at 05:42 PM Posted yesterday at 05:42 PM 14 hours ago, Backdoc said: .........Until the DNA results for Bigfoot could be universally understood and agreed to, it almost seems like a useless tool. Useful for paternity and so ion but surprisingly limited for Bigfoot study. Seems to me that if DNA can ascertain what it is not, it can ascertain that something else is out there. But, as usual, and like everything else, DNA is used for what the powerful want it to be used...........and not to be used for what they don't want it used for..................... 1
Backdoc Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago ^^^ Isn't any suspected Bigfoot DNA sample somewhat of a self-fulfilling prophecy? To be overly simple, If we expect Bigfoot to be in the human-type line, any human like DNA result allows the skeptic to say it's human and not some unknown ape. DNA might be a bit like the height determination of Patty in the PGF. IF Patty was outrageously tall/ 8 foot tall it is so unique it nearly has to be real. If Patty is 6'1'' then Patty could be nearly any adult male in a suit. Unless a DNA result is something we have never seen before, doesn't it suggest its explainable. A common result can be dismissed as not unique enough to meet our/their expectations.
Recommended Posts