7.62 Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago (edited) Kind of strange she didn't have a phone with her hiking in 2019 but I guess it's possible but unlikely . I think I'm going to put this in just a tall tale So later in the story she has a phone but minutes into the story has no camera she says . Yeah I hae really go witha tall tale and she needs to remember what she says because that is a mark of a someone lying . People forget lies Edited 19 hours ago by 7.62 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trogluddite Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago On 11/21/2024 at 5:01 AM, wiiawiwb said: I agree wholeheartedly that the use of a third-party narrator diminishes the usefulness of a report. People I've spoken to who've had a sighting, or were with someone who did, provided more valuable information. It was relived rather than rehearsed and they were seemingly transported back to the incident which afforded the opportunity to peel back layers of the onion to see what lies beneath. The BFF sighting-reports database provides the opportunity to search and mine for nuances. For example, in my area, I found that most sightings and encounters occurred between 9pm and 11pm. That was earlier in the evening than I expected. Once I focused my efforts during that time period, I got more activity such as wood knocks and eyeshine. I'm looking forward to the database coming back online now that I have time again to devote to this. 6 hours ago, FLY said: And what if it's more human than ape? What if it's just large humans that have regressed to feral ? This would explain why it might have been trying to take her. Neanderthals and modern humans mated.We all have neanderthal genes. Maybe this is how it happened back then also I don't disagree with any of this, although if it is more human than ape there may be interesting legal problems for the person who put it on a slab for the scientists to dissect. That would be an interesting legal brief to write - where do humans end and apes begin for the purpose of pursuing a murder conviction? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntster Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago 1 hour ago, Trogluddite said: I'm looking forward to the database coming back online now that I have time again to devote to this............ Oh, I noticed that I couldn't access it anymore. I thought I'd been kicked out. When is it coming back? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FLY Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 14 hours ago, norseman said: What if? Whatever it is it still needs to be classified. Chimps are known to rape human women. So do Dolphins and Dogs. Unfortunately we cannot use a Bigfoots attraction to our females as some sort of Litmus test. Again? How closely related to us it is would only be satisfied by a type specimen. But you see that's the kicker. If it's classified human. Then you would be charged with murder, the mystery would continue because all you shot was some big hairy person walking in the woods and most people believe Bigfoot is something other than a human. I do know most of the stories of people killing one end up with the shooter standing over the body in fear because of how human it looks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norseman Posted 4 hours ago Admin Author Share Posted 4 hours ago 29 minutes ago, FLY said: But you see that's the kicker. If it's classified human. Then you would be charged with murder, the mystery would continue because all you shot was some big hairy person walking in the woods and most people believe Bigfoot is something other than a human. I do know most of the stories of people killing one end up with the shooter standing over the body in fear because of how human it looks. No. That’s not how it works. We have been over this a million times. Collecting a type specimen is not murder. They are not “big hairy persons”. We cannot have our cake and eat it too. Have you not watched any of the presentations by Bill Munns or Jeff Meldrum talking about Bigfoot morphology being different than human? It’s amazing that in all of those stories? Not one body makes it to science. But also not one hunter is charged with murder…… I would guess it’s a primate cousin of humanity, but until a type specimen is collected, it’s all just a educated guess. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trogluddite Posted 37 minutes ago Share Posted 37 minutes ago 15 hours ago, Huntster said: Oh, I noticed that I couldn't access it anymore. I thought I'd been kicked out. When is it coming back? Don't know. Redbone told me that G(igantor) is trying to fix it. I had some questions into G on other issues, but haven't received a response. Being that I know what its like for life to get in the way of hobbies, I haven't pushed the issue. 3 hours ago, norseman said: No. That’s not how it works. We have been over this a million times. Collecting a type specimen is not murder. They are not “big hairy persons”. We cannot have our cake and eat it too. Have you not watched any of the presentations by Bill Munns or Jeff Meldrum talking about Bigfoot morphology being different than human? It’s amazing that in all of those stories? Not one body makes it to science. But also not one hunter is charged with murder…… I would guess it’s a primate cousin of humanity, but until a type specimen is collected, it’s all just a educated guess. Norse, not saying that a hunter would be charged, I just think it would make good fan fiction. Better, dare I say, than the "Bigfoot kidnapped me but we lived happily ever after and we now have five hairy children together" type. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts