For the naysayers of the paraphysical Sasquatch

[NorCalWitness]

A truly interesting video on the most paranormal aspects of the phenomenon 

 

 

[NorCalWitness]

part 2 here

 

 

[bipedalist]

I have to say that I learned a few things and some of the movement and eye characteristics of Sasquatch being covered was a bonus!

 

Otherwise, I will retreat back to my drone swarm hysteria compilations!  

[7.62]

Already know there are things that can either cloak or walk into portals and disappear before your eyes because I watched it happen

in daylight conditions on a dirt road . Not only me but the person I was with saw the exact same thing and described what he saw

before I told him what I saw . Walking on all fours and dark gray in color . His words were when I asked him to describe what he saw he said it just seemed 

to melt away while it was walking towards us. Wasn't a Bigfoot but if these are real what ever it was I believe Bigfoot can be real also.

 

That's what got me started in this because I thought the whole field was just filled with weirdos before this happened to me.

[NorCalWitness]

6 hours ago, 7.62 said:

Already know there are things that can either cloak or walk into portals and disappear before your eyes because I watched it happen

in daylight conditions on a dirt road . Not only me but the person I was with saw the exact same thing and described what he saw

before I told him what I saw . Walking on all fours and dark gray in color . His words were when I asked him to describe what he saw he said it just seemed 

to melt away while it was walking towards us. Wasn't a Bigfoot but if these are real what ever it was I believe Bigfoot can be real also.

 

That's what got me started in this because I thought the whole field was just filled with weirdos before this happened to me.

very interesting, I've had some wild things happen as well. 

[7.62]

44 minutes ago, NorCalWitness said:

very interesting, I've had some wild things happen as well. 

 

I know most  members in this forum discount the notion and I'm okay with that because I really think it's something a person has to see

with his own eyes . 

[bipedalist]

Of course I concur @7.62 ,  the larger question is when things get so complicated when the "hitch-hiker effect" kicks in, that is where the rubber meets the road and will test your mettle! 

[7.62]

21 hours ago, bipedalist said:

Of course I concur @7.62 ,  the larger question is when things get so complicated when the "hitch-hiker effect" kicks in, that is where the rubber meets the road and will test your mettle! 

I was actually hoping for it somewhat because we spent a lot of long days and nights with thermal  hoping to just see it one more time  .

 

We never saw it again ..

[MIB]

22 hours ago, 7.62 said:

 

I know most  members in this forum discount the notion and I'm okay with that because I really think it's something a person has to see

with his own eyes . 

 

The difference between believing and knowing is seeing with your own two eyes rather than relying on someone else's story.    I think it is really important (in all things, not just bigfoot, portals, or whatever) to keep that in mind. 

 

MIB 

[norseman]

The problem with our own two eyes is that they are connected to a lot of preconceived notions.

 

I will use myself as an example. I’ve never actually seen a Bigfoot. But on numerous occasions over decades I have witnessed UFOs. All but one were lights in the sky doing non falling star maneuvers. One was a silver cigar shaped object. None made any noise. My brain wants to put little gray aliens in all of them. But that has nothing to do with what I observed. I do think that in many cases we can rule out human technology. I feel like what I observed was also called “foo fighters” in WW2. And there are much older accounts than that. So by logical deduction? Non human. But what is it?

 

I did observe a snow trackway with my father that defies a known animal or a hoaxer. It’s like seeing a UFO. I see the evidence of its existence but I have no idea what it is. And if I saw a Bigfoot that day walking in the snow? I still wouldn’t know what it was. Even witness accounts describe different things. One witness says it’s an upright walking Gorilla. Another? A hairy human being. But Maybe it nothing!

 

If a vastly higher intelligence is present on Earth? To paraphrase Arthur C Clark? It would be indiscernible from magic.

[NorCalWitness]

2 hours ago, norseman said:

The problem with our own two eyes is that they are connected to a lot of preconceived notions.

 

I will use myself as an example. I’ve never actually seen a Bigfoot. But on numerous occasions over decades I have witnessed UFOs. All but one were lights in the sky doing non falling star maneuvers. One was a silver cigar shaped object. None made any noise. My brain wants to put little gray aliens in all of them. But that has nothing to do with what I observed. I do think that in many cases we can rule out human technology. I feel like what I observed was also called “foo fighters” in WW2. And there are much older accounts than that. So by logical deduction? Non human. But what is it?

 

I did observe a snow trackway with my father that defies a known animal or a hoaxer. It’s like seeing a UFO. I see the evidence of its existence but I have no idea what it is. And if I saw a Bigfoot that day walking in the snow? I still wouldn’t know what it was. Even witness accounts describe different things. One witness says it’s an upright walking Gorilla. Another? A hairy human being. But Maybe it nothing!

 

If a vastly higher intelligence is present on Earth? To paraphrase Arthur C Clark? It would be indiscernible from magic.

anthropomorphizing alien life and sasquatch sets us back in terms of understanding and speed of discovery. good point, Norse. 

 

Is there a term for assigning attributes of great apes to other animals? 

Edited January 6 by NorCalWitness

[7.62]

5 hours ago, norseman said:

The problem with our own two eyes is that they are connected to a lot of preconceived notions.

 

I will use myself as an example. I’ve never actually seen a Bigfoot. But on numerous occasions over decades I have witnessed UFOs. All but one were lights in the sky doing non falling star maneuvers. One was a silver cigar shaped object. None made any noise. My brain wants to put little gray aliens in all of them. But that has nothing to do with what I observed. I do think that in many cases we can rule out human technology. I feel like what I observed was also called “foo fighters” in WW2. And there are much older accounts than that. So by logical deduction? Non human. But what is it?

 

I did observe a snow trackway with my father that defies a known animal or a hoaxer. It’s like seeing a UFO. I see the evidence of its existence but I have no idea what it is. And if I saw a Bigfoot that day walking in the snow? I still wouldn’t know what it was. Even witness accounts describe different things. One witness says it’s an upright walking Gorilla. Another? A hairy human being. But Maybe it nothing!

 

If a vastly higher intelligence is present on Earth? To paraphrase Arthur C Clark? It would be indiscernible from magic.

I agree because the first thing I said was hey Mark there's a horse in the road . Your mind will try to make your eyes see what makes sense to you . But it wasn't a horse 

and it  was weird.  I posted before in another thread it didn't have a face  . This wasn't far it was at best 75 or 80 yards that's pretty damn close .

Daylight with nothing to obstruct our field of view as I said on the side of a dirt road walking towards us. I have  no idea what it was and it just was there and then as it was walking towards us and just seemed to melt away as my friend put it .  

Like I said until it happens to you though it's just another story to be added to the 1000's of others ..

[RedHawk454]

Human eyes only see visible light on the electromagnetic spectrum. 
 

also

 

Human eyes only see what’s relevant to us..

[NorCalWitness]

13 hours ago, RedHawk454 said:

Human eyes only see visible light on the electromagnetic spectrum. 
 

also

 

Human eyes only see what’s relevant to us..

This comment holds much truth and potential in terms of expanded understanding. Our perceptive capabilities are the true limiting factor in attaining understanding of this phenomenon, in my opinion.