NorCalWitness Posted January 17 Posted January 17 Can you please expand on how you think this is relevant to the Sasquatch topic? 1 1
Doodler Posted January 17 Posted January 17 1 hour ago, NorCalWitness said: Can you please expand on how you think this is relevant to the Sasquatch topic? First off, it's interesting information, second it's a revolution in the understanding of human evolution and as far as it being sasquatch related, It's elementary. If there's evidence that neanderthal and or homoerectus lived in NA, it's evidence that hominids spread world wide far more than previously recorded. And, since we don't actually know what sasquatch is, and some of the leading theories are that sasquatch are relic hominids like these two species, just evolved for bigness by a million years of isolation on this hemisphere, it follows that evidence for these two species being here is evidence for sasquatch more likely being them or their descendants. Personally, and entirely unrelated to how these two being in the WH, I think we are being slow walked into realization that "human" is a very loose term at best and a dozen distinct but related animals are known as mankind today. Like dogs are a hundred different breeds but still cross fertile, so is mankind. But only time will tell. 2 2
NorCalWitness Posted January 17 Posted January 17 1 hour ago, Doodler said: First off, it's interesting information, second it's a revolution in the understanding of human evolution and as far as it being sasquatch related, It's elementary. If there's evidence that neanderthal and or homoerectus lived in NA, it's evidence that hominids spread world wide far more than previously recorded. And, since we don't actually know what sasquatch is, and some of the leading theories are that sasquatch are relic hominids like these two species, just evolved for bigness by a million years of isolation on this hemisphere, it follows that evidence for these two species being here is evidence for sasquatch more likely being them or their descendants. Personally, and entirely unrelated to how these two being in the WH, I think we are being slow walked into realization that "human" is a very loose term at best and a dozen distinct but related animals are known as mankind today. Like dogs are a hundred different breeds but still cross fertile, so is mankind. But only time will tell. 1. being interesting doesn't mean it should be posted without context. 2. so rock tools from ancient humans are now evidence of Sasquatch how? have there been observations of tool creation by Sasquatch? if Sasquatch were descendants of these beings, wouldn't they be making tools from rocks as well? while your topics are all in the same ballpark, they don't weave the tapestry you are trying to make them weave. The fact that humans and their predecessors were global doesn't mean anything for the likelihood of Sasquatch being their descendant. interesting video? sure. related to the topic of interest here? not really. spammy post with no context and just a video link? absolutely.
norseman Posted January 17 Admin Author Posted January 17 1 hour ago, NorCalWitness said: 1. being interesting doesn't mean it should be posted without context. 2. so rock tools from ancient humans are now evidence of Sasquatch how? have there been observations of tool creation by Sasquatch? if Sasquatch were descendants of these beings, wouldn't they be making tools from rocks as well? while your topics are all in the same ballpark, they don't weave the tapestry you are trying to make them weave. The fact that humans and their predecessors were global doesn't mean anything for the likelihood of Sasquatch being their descendant. interesting video? sure. related to the topic of interest here? not really. spammy post with no context and just a video link? absolutely. 1) I don’t need your permission to post X, Y or Z. And I don’t give a pile of bull manure if you find it uninteresting or spammy or whatever. My suggestion is to drop the attitude.🫤 2) You may not be aware, but I found a Elk femur bone in the Selkirk mountains in which a hammer and anvil technique was used to extract bone marrow. Other groups have found evidence of stone tool use as well. Chimps also use primitive tools too. It’s well documented. 3) We don’t know what Sasquatch is. Which means YOU don’t know what Sasquatch is. So if other researchers in non Sasquatch circles are finding evidence of archaic hominids in NORTH AMERICA? You better believe I am sitting up and taking notice. As well you should too. I take keen interest in the Cerutti Mastodon find, the Chapala lake skull cap find, the Calico dig site, etc. Anything that debunks the Clovis first scenario. Some of this is obviously Homo Sapien. But some of it IS NOT. What was extracting bone marrow from a Mastodon 130,000 years ago in California…. not Homo Sapiens! What’s harvesting Elk bone marrow in NE Washington in 2020? 🤷♂️ Is this relevant to Sasquatch? You better believe it is. We have 12 feet of snow here now at 5000 feet. Sasquatch isn’t eating berries or skunk cabbage right now. Which leaves what? Meat. Fat. Bone marrow. 👍 2 1
bipedalist Posted January 18 BFF Patron Posted January 18 1 hour ago, norseman said: Getting an error message....not permitted to see it from above link?
norseman Posted January 18 Admin Author Posted January 18 50 minutes ago, bipedalist said: Getting an error message....not permitted to see it from above link? It’s the femur analysis in the researcher section. 2
norseman Posted January 18 Admin Author Posted January 18 11 minutes ago, Incorrigible1 said: I guess it’s in the premium section. So the link won’t show for everyone. 1
iacozizzle Posted January 18 Posted January 18 I stumbled upon an account that has a sasquatch using tools. Using two rocks to set some leaves on fire. It's just after the 15:00 mark. This witness is supposed to have a part 2 coming.
bipedalist Posted January 18 BFF Patron Posted January 18 (edited) @iacozizzle Just listened to this prior to your posting. The constant reference to military training and special forces gave me the impression that this may have been a "story" and not an experience IMHO. Selection of campsite in this "story" did not sound like somebody with that kind of training. Sounded like a multipart story to gain Youtube hits. Thanks for posting just the same. Edited to add: The narrator has a lovely voice and ought to go pro! Edited January 18 by bipedalist
iacozizzle Posted January 18 Posted January 18 I agree. I don't know much about campsite selection and military training. I try to be open minded about these but this one is rather fantastic.
norseman Posted January 18 Admin Author Posted January 18 I know the NAWAC documented a nut cracking station in their research area “area X”.
bipedalist Posted January 18 BFF Patron Posted January 18 (edited) It would be interesting to know if the storyline of the firebuilding Sasquatch included grabbing the rocks used and checking for the type? DNA op missed, lol! I remember the nutcracker description at NAWAC. Heck even crows position hickory nuts around here to be driven over on pavement for cheap meals. Edited January 18 by bipedalist
Recommended Posts