norseman Posted yesterday at 02:06 AM Admin Posted yesterday at 02:06 AM 12 minutes ago, socialBigfoot said: I wrote a post about the 'bones' argument a couple months ago on substack. There's a field of study called 'comparative thanatology' that has some application here -- its the study of how different species deal with the death of members of their group, flock, pod, herd, colony, etc. You can find it here if interested: https://thesocialbigfoot.substack.com/p/where-are-all-the-bones And there is also the topography of the area. Very few fossils of the Chimpanzee.
guyzonthropus Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago There wasn't geographic isolation from chimps when humans diverted? I would think speciation would have occurred between forest dwellers and those on the periphery of the plains/savannah, though I suppose there could still be contact between the two groups. Perhaps we were shunned by the chimps once we started our transition to bipedalism "oh they think they're just so upright and tall and always going on about their precision grip! Big deal!"
Recommended Posts