norseman Posted Thursday at 03:09 AM Admin Posted Thursday at 03:09 AM 1 hour ago, CryptidTalk said: That’s still not proof of any sort of cover up. That’s conspiracy theory. Show me a whistleblower talking about it. Show me government documents discussing it. Something credible. Not speculative theory. Your joking right?!! Lyle Laverty (USFS) Paul Freeman (USFS) Kathy Strain (California Parks) David Paulides (CA Cop and author of 411 books) Brian Gosselin (NY Cop) Seriously you need to go dig around, and see how many Federal employees, Cops, Military, etc have spoken out.
CryptidTalk Posted Thursday at 01:37 PM Author Posted Thursday at 01:37 PM 10 hours ago, norseman said: Your joking right?!! Lyle Laverty (USFS) Paul Freeman (USFS) Kathy Strain (California Parks) David Paulides (CA Cop and author of 411 books) Brian Gosselin (NY Cop) Seriously you need to go dig around, and see how many Federal employees, Cops, Military, etc have spoken out. Yeah, people speaking out about their stories doesn’t equate to a government coverup. Again, you’re providing speculation, not concrete proof of your claim. It’s a fun idea, but without proof it’s just a theory.
norseman Posted Thursday at 03:08 PM Admin Posted Thursday at 03:08 PM 1 hour ago, CryptidTalk said: Yeah, people speaking out about their stories doesn’t equate to a government coverup. Again, you’re providing speculation, not concrete proof of your claim. It’s a fun idea, but without proof it’s just a theory. “Show me a whistleblower talking about it” So now you want the Govt whistleblower to have a Bigfoot under his arm? You keep moving the goal posts…. Did Grusch or Favor have a flying saucer under their arm when they gave their testimony? No. Of course not. If we had that? We wouldn’t need the whistleblower now would we? Dave Paulides exposed a complete Park Service coverup of the number of missing people in the park system. And they told him it would cost over a million dollars to compile such a report! There is plenty of information out there if you care to look, or not.🤷♂️
norseman Posted Thursday at 03:14 PM Admin Posted Thursday at 03:14 PM Why would armed green berets search for a missing child in a national park? They NEVER do that.
CryptidTalk Posted Thursday at 03:18 PM Author Posted Thursday at 03:18 PM 7 minutes ago, norseman said: “Show me a whistleblower talking about it” So now you want the Govt whistleblower to have a Bigfoot under his arm? You keep moving the goal posts…. Did Grusch or Favor have a flying saucer under their arm when they gave their testimony? No. Of course not. If we had that? We wouldn’t need the whistleblower now would we? Dave Paulides exposed a complete Park Service coverup of the number of missing people in the park system. And they told him it would cost over a million dollars to compile such a report! There is plenty of information out there if you care to look, or not.🤷♂️ I’m not moving the goalposts. I asked for proof. A whistleblower is going to leak official documents supporting their claim. Telling stories is just that, telling stories. You have provided stories and theories, not proof.
CryptidTalk Posted Thursday at 03:34 PM Author Posted Thursday at 03:34 PM 15 minutes ago, norseman said: Why would armed green berets search for a missing child in a national park? They NEVER do that. I haven’t seen any proof that they were armed. But they were nearby doing training exercises and were brought in to help as a result. It’s not uncommon at all for SF to do various training in Appalachia. Land nav, SERE, etc. while I wasn’t SF, I trained with them multiple times in Appalachia. Them being utilized was just a byproduct of them already being present.
norseman Posted Thursday at 03:35 PM Admin Posted Thursday at 03:35 PM 13 minutes ago, CryptidTalk said: I’m not moving the goalposts. I asked for proof. A whistleblower is going to leak official documents supporting their claim. Telling stories is just that, telling stories. You have provided stories and theories, not proof. No they are not. I don’t think you understand how whistleblowers work! Whistleblowers usually give their story to an investigative reporter. And he blows the story open for the whistleblower. Hoping the attention gains traction, and hopefully gets a Congressional hearing. And that is exactly what I have provided you with. Government employees telling their stories that go completely against the narrative. Here is what it looks like. And who broke his story first?
norseman Posted Thursday at 03:38 PM Admin Posted Thursday at 03:38 PM 1 minute ago, CryptidTalk said: I haven’t seen any proof that they were armed. But they were nearby doing training exercises and were brought in to help as a result. It’s not uncommon at all for SF to do various training in Appalachia. Land nav, SERE, etc. while I wasn’t SF, I trained with them multiple times in Appalachia. Them being utilized was just a byproduct of them already being present. They were armed and they did NOT coordinate with search and rescue. How many missing people are there in Appalachia and how many times has SF intervened? Just Dennis Martin!
CryptidTalk Posted Thursday at 03:39 PM Author Posted Thursday at 03:39 PM 2 minutes ago, norseman said: No they are not. I don’t think you understand how whistleblowers work! Whistleblowers usually give their story to an investigative reporter. And he blows the story open for the whistleblower. Hoping the attention gains traction, and hopefully gets a Congressional hearing. And that is exactly what I have provided you with. Government employees telling their stories that go completely against the narrative. Here is what it looks like. And who broke his story first? If I’m not providing proof of my claims, I’m not a whistleblower. I’m a story teller.
CryptidTalk Posted Thursday at 03:46 PM Author Posted Thursday at 03:46 PM 1 minute ago, norseman said: They were armed and they did NOT coordinate with search and rescue. How many missing people are there in Appalachia and how many times has SF intervened? Just Dennis Martin! Then provide me proof of them being armed, with live ammunition… Should be easy to do since you’re so confident. How many searches have been as large as Martin’s? How many has SF been nearby training? You’re assuming these two things most definitely mean something but you’re providing zero actual evidence to back it up. You’re only providing theory. Their involvement does not automatically mean government coverup. That’s conspiracy fringe land. Your personal opinion isn’t proof.
norseman Posted Thursday at 03:49 PM Admin Posted Thursday at 03:49 PM 6 minutes ago, CryptidTalk said: If I’m not providing proof of my claims, I’m not a whistleblower. I’m a story teller. That’s not a whistleblower. Thats probably a Congressional task force that is authorized to go digging around DOD, FBI records to collaborate the accusations. Bigfoot is not there yet. But UAPs are approaching it. Listen? The reason why conspiracy theories abound? Is because our government has zero transparency to the U.S. taxpayer! You do a FOIA request and what you get (if you get anything at all) is so heavily redacted you cannot read it! 4 minutes ago, CryptidTalk said: Then provide me proof of them being armed, with live ammunition… Should be easy to do since you’re so confident. How many searches have been as large as Martin’s? How many has SF been nearby training? You’re assuming these two things most definitely mean something but you’re providing zero actual evidence to back it up. You’re only providing theory. Their involvement does not automatically mean government coverup. That’s conspiracy fringe land. Your personal opinion isn’t proof. I am done spoon feeding you like a baby. You are obviously as green as grass. So go dig around. Have fun!
CryptidTalk Posted Thursday at 03:59 PM Author Posted Thursday at 03:59 PM 2 minutes ago, norseman said: I am done spoon feeding you like a baby. You are obviously as green as grass. So go dig around. Have fun! You’re not spoon feeding anything other than your opinion. You’re providing literally zero proof. Stories are not proof. You are making a claim. I’m asking you to support it with actual evidence and you are failing. Instead of admitting it’s a theory, you want to accuse me of being green, then tuck your tail and run. That really seems, to me, to be an admission that you have no proof. Because if you did, you would have provided it already.
NorCalWitness Posted Thursday at 04:00 PM Posted Thursday at 04:00 PM 33 minutes ago, CryptidTalk said: I’m not moving the goalposts. I asked for proof. A whistleblower is going to leak official documents supporting their claim. Telling stories is just that, telling stories. You have provided stories and theories, not proof. witness testimony is enough to convict someone of capital murder. your bar is a false one.
Recommended Posts