norseman Posted Thursday at 04:24 PM Admin Posted Thursday at 04:24 PM 1 minute ago, CryptidTalk said: For me, burden of proof has been met to verify the validity of the PG film. Along with Dr. Meldrum’s various assessment of prints and locomotion. Again, the government is an entity. A singular person in the military does not represent the “government”. There is too much red tape and bureaucracy. The entity itself is too busy with other things to worry about new species of animals. They’ll acknowledge it when science does. What reasons do they have to cover up its existence? What reasons do the have to cover up UFO’s? But they do….
CryptidTalk Posted Thursday at 04:24 PM Author Posted Thursday at 04:24 PM 1 minute ago, norseman said: More importantly? It will never be indisputable proof. Your making a straw man argument. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man#:~:text=A straw man fallacy (sometimes,"attacking a straw man". We started with you asking for testimony. Which I gave you. Now you want an ape man on a slab. Which is the only indisputable proof….. Where have I stated I wanted ape man on a slab? You’re making erroneous assumptions. A mere document discussing a coverup would more than suffice.
CryptidTalk Posted Thursday at 04:27 PM Author Posted Thursday at 04:27 PM Just now, norseman said: What reasons do the have to cover up UFO’s? But they do…. I mean, none that are valid. However, admitting the existence of a far superior being that would likely dispel all proof of major religions and cause mass hysteria could be interpreted as a valid reason for some. But I don’t really see Bigfoot matching that description. So what need would they have to cover it up?
norseman Posted Thursday at 04:27 PM Admin Posted Thursday at 04:27 PM Just now, CryptidTalk said: Where have I stated I wanted ape man on a slab? You’re making erroneous assumptions. A mere document discussing a coverup would more than suffice. You stated you wanted PROOF. Thats the only proof you’re gonna get! Mere? A mere document like the redacted one above I provided? You think the government is gonna give you evidence of their skullduggery? Just now, CryptidTalk said: I mean, none that are valid. However, admitting the existence of a far superior being that would likely dispel all proof of major religions and cause mass hysteria could be interpreted as a valid reason for some. But I don’t really see Bigfoot matching that description. So what need would they have to cover it up? I don’t know how old you are but I am old enough to remember the fights over the missing link…. Plenty of religious implications there that I won’t go into because we don’t talk politics or religion in this sub forum.
CryptidTalk Posted Thursday at 04:29 PM Author Posted Thursday at 04:29 PM Just now, norseman said: You stated you wanted PROOF. Thats the only proof you’re gonna get! Mere? A mere document like the redacted one above I provided? You think the government is gonna give you evidence of their skullduggery? Thats what I would need to be convinced, yes. That doesn’t make me green. That makes me logical because I don’t accept fringe theory without proper evidence.
NorCalWitness Posted Thursday at 04:30 PM Posted Thursday at 04:30 PM 2 minutes ago, CryptidTalk said: Then provide actual, indisputable proof that I am wrong. I’m green because I don’t believe a fringe theory with no proof? you are green because you don't have the knowledge that there are MANY accounts of proof, higher ups knowing and telling people to be quiet about it. Here is a thread to get you started. Many good resources in the comments: not stop being a ********* and get to learning. much catchup to do. 1 minute ago, CryptidTalk said: Thats what I would need to be convinced, yes. That doesn’t make me green. That makes me logical because I don’t accept fringe theory without proper evidence. I, for one, do not give 2 shits if you are convinced. you aren't important enough to care about. 5 minutes ago, CryptidTalk said: I mean, none that are valid. However, admitting the existence of a far superior being that would likely dispel all proof of major religions and cause mass hysteria could be interpreted as a valid reason for some. But I don’t really see Bigfoot matching that description. So what need would they have to cover it up? Alien life has no implication on religion. That is a boring and played out theory.
norseman Posted Thursday at 04:32 PM Admin Posted Thursday at 04:32 PM Just now, CryptidTalk said: Thats what I would need to be convinced, yes. That doesn’t make me green. That makes me logical because I don’t accept fringe theory without proper evidence. You’re the one who is fringe. No one thinks that the government lying to the American people is fringe anymore. Your clinging to a belief that the government with a TRILLION dollar per year defense budget cannot detect a Bigfoot walking from BC into Washington based on INCOMPETENCE.🤣🤣🤣 1
CryptidTalk Posted Thursday at 04:38 PM Author Posted Thursday at 04:38 PM 4 minutes ago, NorCalWitness said: you are green because you don't have the knowledge that there are MANY accounts of proof, higher ups knowing and telling people to be quiet about it. Here is a thread to get you started. Many good resources in the comments: not stop being a ********* and get to learning. much catchup to do. I, for one, do not give 2 shits if you are convinced. you aren't important enough to care about. Alien life has no implication on religion. That is a boring and played out theory. Believing fringe theory isn’t knowledge, my dude. Hate to break it to you. It’s not about being important. You have made a claim and I have asked you to provide PROOF of that claim. You have not been able to do so and are name calling because I don’t accept your opinion as valid. I literally said it’s not valid, but one could see where some incompetent leadership would. Try to keep up. 5 minutes ago, norseman said:You’re clinging to a belief that the government with a TRILLION dollar per year defense budget cannot detect a Bigfoot walking from BC into Washington based on INCOMPETENCE.🤣🤣🤣 Please show me where I stated they cannot? I’ve stated they’re not trying to because it’s not important to them. Do you always jump to erroneous assumptions about other people when they disagree with you? You’re a literal nobody on the internet. I’m not required to take your word as gospel.
NorCalWitness Posted Thursday at 04:42 PM Posted Thursday at 04:42 PM 4 minutes ago, CryptidTalk said: Believing fringe theory isn’t knowledge, my dude. Hate to break it to you. It’s not about being important. You have made a claim and I have asked you to provide PROOF of that claim. You have not been able to do so and are name calling because I don’t accept your opinion as valid. I literally said it’s not valid, but one could see where some incompetent leadership would. Try to keep up. Please show me where I stated they cannot? I’ve stated they’re not trying to because it’s not important to them. Do you always jump to erroneous assumptions about other people when they disagree with you? You’re a literal nobody on the internet. I’m not required to take your word as gospel. tell me, what other cryptids do you believe exist?
norseman Posted Thursday at 04:44 PM Admin Posted Thursday at 04:44 PM 1 minute ago, CryptidTalk said: Believing fringe theory isn’t knowledge, my dude. Hate to break it to you. It’s not about being important. You have made a claim and I have asked you to provide PROOF of that claim. You have not been able to do so and are name calling because I don’t accept your opinion as valid. I literally said it’s not valid, but one could see where some incompetent leadership would. Try to keep up. Did “incompetent leadership” do these things? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_Syphilis_Study https://www.thecrimson.com/article/1994/6/9/cold-war-radiation-tests-on-children/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MKUltra
CryptidTalk Posted Thursday at 05:29 PM Author Posted Thursday at 05:29 PM 45 minutes ago, NorCalWitness said: tell me, what other cryptids do you believe exist? Big cats in Appalachia where they’re not supposed to be. Outside of that, it’s all circumstantial at best. I believe ground sloths in South America and Orang Pendek are plausible but suffice isn’t evidence hasn’t been provided.
CryptidTalk Posted Thursday at 05:32 PM Author Posted Thursday at 05:32 PM 46 minutes ago, norseman said: Did “incompetent leadership” do these things? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_Syphilis_Study https://www.thecrimson.com/article/1994/6/9/cold-war-radiation-tests-on-children/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MKUltra Of course, one would have to be incompetent to do those things. But that’s still not sufficient proof to show there is a coverup.
norseman Posted Thursday at 05:37 PM Admin Posted Thursday at 05:37 PM 1 minute ago, CryptidTalk said: Of course, one would have to be incompetent to do those things. But that’s still not sufficient proof to show there is a coverup. Ok then we cannot even agree on that. Thats NOT incompetence, thats a willful pre planned attack on humans that was covered up for decades. I think we are at loggerheads. Have a nice day.
CryptidTalk Posted Thursday at 05:39 PM Author Posted Thursday at 05:39 PM Just now, norseman said: Ok then we cannot even agree on that. Thats NOT incompetence, thats a willful pre planned attack on humans that was covered up for decades. I think we are at loggerheads. Have a nice day. You do realize it can be both, right? Doing something that is objectively bad for society is, by definition, incompetence.
norseman Posted Thursday at 05:42 PM Admin Posted Thursday at 05:42 PM 1 minute ago, CryptidTalk said: You do realize it can be both, right? Doing something that is objectively bad for society is, by definition, incompetence. No. Not the same. Incompetent people do harm without intending to do so. In all three cases they set out to intentionally harm people in order to study the effects in the after math. That isn’t incompetence. That’s evil.
Recommended Posts