socialBigfoot Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago I recently explored BFRO report data and found this trend (chart below) in Class A (good evidence) and Class B (questionable evidence) reports interesting, particularly the primacy of Class B reports after around 2005. I'm curious about the forums' thoughts regarding factors driving this pattern. Was it: - change in the types of witnesses reporting encounters (probably due to greater access to Bigfoot information via the web) - change in BFRO investigators -- i.e., more critical investigators reviewing reports - change in BFRO protocols for classifying reports -- i.e., more stringent criteria for Class A - something else? Any other observations worth more attention? The decline in Class A & B reports after 2005 to levels last recorded in the 80s is intriguing, too. I would have thought the running of Finding Bigfoot (2011-2018) and then Expedition Bigfoot (2019- ) would correlate with more frequent reports rather than fewer. NOTES: Data pulled from Kaggle: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/mexwell/bigfoot-sightings/data Report data available through February 2023, hence the low rates that year. 1
Huntster Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Excellent find. 1 hour ago, socialBigfoot said: ........Was it: - change in the types of witnesses reporting encounters (probably due to greater access to Bigfoot information via the web) - change in BFRO investigators -- i.e., more critical investigators reviewing reports - change in BFRO protocols for classifying reports -- i.e., more stringent criteria for Class A......... None of these seem likely because the A & B types paralleled each other. Quote ........something else? How about: - A rise and fall in the total number of BFRO reports published, independent of how many reports they've received? _ A natural biological fluctuation in Bigfoot population densities? - Are they nearing extinction? Quote .........Any other observations worth more attention? The decline in Class A & B reports after 2005 to levels last recorded in the 80s is intriguing, too. I would have thought the running of Finding Bigfoot (2011-2018) and then Expedition Bigfoot (2019- ) would correlate with more frequent reports rather than fewer. Excellent observation. Increased media exposure should increase reports. Glickman discussed this: http://www.bigfootencounters.com/biology/nasi.htm
Recommended Posts