Backdoc Posted Friday at 07:43 PM Posted Friday at 07:43 PM Q: Does anyone know if this is real? Does anyone know if the story behind this was investigated? I have seen this audio featured in a Bigfoot Documentary or two. It sounds pretty interesting. What effort if any has been done to investigate it? 911 can track who calls and from where. I didn't know if there was an effort from law enforcement (police report), local TV, or whatever to look into this further. The caller sounds pretty convincing and the call sounds pretty natural. Anyone know?
Huntster Posted Friday at 08:36 PM Posted Friday at 08:36 PM It is unverified and will remain that way. This is yet another example of "government" power to simply close the book on the phenomenon if it so chooses.
socialBigfoot Posted Saturday at 10:31 PM Posted Saturday at 10:31 PM The BFRO refers to this as the "Northwest 911 Call" and says the recording is available on Ron Morehead's bigfoot recordings CD. (https://www.bfro.net/avevid/sierrasounds/911.asp) On Morehead's website the description of the recording is confusing at best. The site says, "On Track 10, Ron placed an emergency 911 call that is completely unrelated to the story but nevertheless it provides the listener with a live eyewitness account of an actual sighting." ... which sounds like Ron heard the story and then faked a 911 call to dramatize it?? This is news to me. If I'm reading this right, that voice we hear on the 911 call is Ron Morehead pretending to be the witness he and Peter Byrne interviewed. It's a sketchy thing to do, in my opinion. Judge for yourself: https://ronmorehead.com/about-bigfoot-recordings/ Someone please correct me if this is inaccurate. Gotta say, though, the 911 caller sounds similar to Morehead. 2
guyzonthropus Posted Sunday at 07:30 PM Posted Sunday at 07:30 PM This was in Washington state wasn't it?
socialBigfoot Posted Sunday at 11:31 PM Posted Sunday at 11:31 PM 3 hours ago, guyzonthropus said: This was in Washington state wasn't it? BFRO says this occurred on the Kitsap Peninsula, Washington (west of Seattle, across Puget Sound, and east of Olympic National Park). https://maps.app.goo.gl/97mMt8myvkbniM4f7
JKH Posted yesterday at 03:15 AM Posted yesterday at 03:15 AM It took me a long time to figure this out, years ago the BFRO didn't have as much detail, so I remember thinking it was Pierce County. Later I learned more through various sources. It's a classic, legit for sure, think Ron was in BFRO but could be wrong. He may have said more in recent years, IDK.
Backdoc Posted 7 hours ago Author Posted 7 hours ago On 5/16/2025 at 3:36 PM, Huntster said: It is unverified and will remain that way. This is yet another example of "government" power to simply close the book on the phenomenon if it so chooses. If we call 911 for an emergency, I am confident immediately they know the phone number, name, location and so on of the caller. Further I have to think it is recorded and kept for some period of time. Even if the tape would be erased, you would think we could go through some freedom of information act stuff to find out who made the Bigfoot call. We might even find out other details as to what actions the cops took that night-if any For example: the 911 call of Nichole Brown Simpson... I don't think any local dispatcher, cop, or sheriff would remove the recording or the info that goes with it in some sort of conspiracy. 1
Backdoc Posted 5 hours ago Author Posted 5 hours ago On 5/17/2025 at 5:31 PM, socialBigfoot said: The BFRO refers to this as the "Northwest 911 Call" and says the recording is available on Ron Morehead's bigfoot recordings CD. (https://www.bfro.net/avevid/sierrasounds/911.asp) On Morehead's website the description of the recording is confusing at best. The site says, "On Track 10, Ron placed an emergency 911 call that is completely unrelated to the story but nevertheless it provides the listener with a live eyewitness account of an actual sighting." ... which sounds like Ron heard the story and then faked a 911 call to dramatize it?? This is news to me. If I'm reading this right, that voice we hear on the 911 call is Ron Morehead pretending to be the witness he and Peter Byrne interviewed. It's a sketchy thing to do, in my opinion. ^^^^^ This is my point in asking the Question starting the thread. If this is an authentic 911 tape/ recording it is a pretty amazing thing to consider. If it is not, we need to know. If someone is portraying a transcript of such a recording it needs to be made very clear this is a RECREATION or a DRAUMITIZATION of some report. Even then, we should find the person who called (recreation or not) and further document their story behind the events which lead up to the call. If it is real 911 call it should leave traces for us to find out more about the incident. I'm just trying to find out the truth. Thanks again for posting. If this Bigfoot call is bogus, we lose credibility if we promote it as authentic.
Huntster Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 5 hours ago, Backdoc said: If we call 911 for an emergency, I am confident immediately they know the phone number, name, location and so on of the caller. Further I have to think it is recorded and kept for some period of time. Even if the tape would be erased, you would think we could go through some freedom of information act stuff to find out who made the Bigfoot call. We might even find out other details as to what actions the cops took that night-if any For example: the 911 call of Nichole Brown Simpson... I don't think any local dispatcher, cop, or sheriff would remove the recording or the info that goes with it in some sort of conspiracy. ^^^^^ All correct. However........ 1) If this recording was a hoax or "re-enactment" of a call nobody can locate, there is no "conspiracy", or....... 2) If an officer responded and found no evidence of anything, the incident disappears into the nexus of millions of such calls throughout the PNW over a decade or so, even if filed in a box in storage, or........ 3) Any number of other such scenarios where nobody (especially a law enforcement agency) cares about the call and recording, and........ 4) Would scoff ("cover up") if a "bigfoot researcher" showed up with a FOIA demand which would require lots of valuable resources to research and find, and which wouldn't really prove anything even if found. Personally, I find the recording and story very entertaining, but ultimately, like so much other bigfoot evidence, is essentially worthless for anything other than entertainment. No need for s "conspiracy" if government is wise enough to think likewise.
Recommended Posts