Is the Bigfoot Forum losing interest?

[norseman]

2 hours ago, BlackRockBigfoot said:

There are more people than ever who are involved with investigating the topic on a pretty serious level.  Lots of small facebook groups focused on trading ideas on equipment and techniques.  Theories and experiences.  
 

a forum setting would probably be more suited to that type of discussion, although I guess Facebook does have the convenience factor.  
 

Heck, there might be a way to introduce the BFF to some of those folks 

Ive watched your videos with you and your wife doing research together.

 

Quite frankly with a Discovery camera crew? You guys are every bit as good as any other TV show out there.

 

And maybe thats the secret to the BFF? It needs a media front to funnel people back to the forum. 
 

And same goes for the WV crew and Lane County crew. Also a shout out to everyone that posts in the Field Trip section.

 

Looking at pictures and video of beautiful mountains and forests and possibly evidence is always a highlight for me personally.

[RedHawk454]

I'm a believer in Sasquatch, and i hope to someday become a knower

 

but

 

I asked chatgpt if Bigfoot is real and this is what it said:

 

is bigfoot real? ChatGPT said:


No, Bigfoot is not real. There is zero scientifically credible evidence to support the existence of such a creature. Every supposed sighting, footprint, or video has either been debunked, lacks verifiability, or is anecdotal. In contrast, extensive wildlife studies, camera traps, and modern tracking technologies have failed to produce a single verifiable specimen or consistent biological trace.

The idea persists because it's profitable (TV shows, merchandise, tourism) and taps into human fascination with the unknown. But from a practical standpoint, a large, elusive primate population surviving undetected in North America is implausible. It's fiction, not fact.

 

 

 

[socialBigfoot]

3 hours ago, RedHawk454 said:

I asked chatgpt if Bigfoot is real and this is what it said:

ChatGPT is sensitive to the prompt / question you ask. I tried something a little more specific and got a more balanced response. It's too long to paste here but try something like: "Is it plausible that North America is home to an undiscovered species of large primate?"  It'll give you a detailed response and ask if you want more information. See where it leads you. 

[norseman]

I am not a knower with Bigfoot. I am a knower with UFOs on many occasions back to the 70s. Chat GPT probably says the same thing.
 

There is zero evidence.

 

But I will trust my eye balls over a computer any day.

[OntarioSquatch]

AI responses can be inaccurate. Recently I received incorrect info on cellphone reception for a certain location. Now I research every answer I get for fear that it’ll mislead me again. I guess you can try to use it to solve scientific mysteries, but I wouldn’t recommend it.