norseman Posted Thursday at 09:41 PM Admin Posted Thursday at 09:41 PM 2 hours ago, BlackRockBigfoot said: There are more people than ever who are involved with investigating the topic on a pretty serious level. Lots of small facebook groups focused on trading ideas on equipment and techniques. Theories and experiences. a forum setting would probably be more suited to that type of discussion, although I guess Facebook does have the convenience factor. Heck, there might be a way to introduce the BFF to some of those folks Ive watched your videos with you and your wife doing research together. Quite frankly with a Discovery camera crew? You guys are every bit as good as any other TV show out there. And maybe thats the secret to the BFF? It needs a media front to funnel people back to the forum. And same goes for the WV crew and Lane County crew. Also a shout out to everyone that posts in the Field Trip section. Looking at pictures and video of beautiful mountains and forests and possibly evidence is always a highlight for me personally.
RedHawk454 Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago I'm a believer in Sasquatch, and i hope to someday become a knower but I asked chatgpt if Bigfoot is real and this is what it said: is bigfoot real? ChatGPT said: No, Bigfoot is not real. There is zero scientifically credible evidence to support the existence of such a creature. Every supposed sighting, footprint, or video has either been debunked, lacks verifiability, or is anecdotal. In contrast, extensive wildlife studies, camera traps, and modern tracking technologies have failed to produce a single verifiable specimen or consistent biological trace. The idea persists because it's profitable (TV shows, merchandise, tourism) and taps into human fascination with the unknown. But from a practical standpoint, a large, elusive primate population surviving undetected in North America is implausible. It's fiction, not fact.
socialBigfoot Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 3 hours ago, RedHawk454 said: I asked chatgpt if Bigfoot is real and this is what it said: ChatGPT is sensitive to the prompt / question you ask. I tried something a little more specific and got a more balanced response. It's too long to paste here but try something like: "Is it plausible that North America is home to an undiscovered species of large primate?" It'll give you a detailed response and ask if you want more information. See where it leads you.
norseman Posted 13 hours ago Admin Posted 13 hours ago I am not a knower with Bigfoot. I am a knower with UFOs on many occasions back to the 70s. Chat GPT probably says the same thing. There is zero evidence. But I will trust my eye balls over a computer any day.
OntarioSquatch Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago AI responses can be inaccurate. Recently I received incorrect info on cellphone reception for a certain location. Now I research every answer I get for fear that it’ll mislead me again. I guess you can try to use it to solve scientific mysteries, but I wouldn’t recommend it.
bipedalist Posted 3 hours ago BFF Patron Posted 3 hours ago On 6/9/2025 at 8:09 PM, Trogluddite said: Well, I did do an online business lookup of the Bigfoot Forums which revealed that this site is worth over $1,000,000!!! Amazing how fast those $20 contributions to the cause add up. Also amazing? How wrong online business lookup sites can be. Probably the appraised auction value like with antiques because of all the fossils we have here we call members, speaking for myself in the antiquarian sense too 1
Recommended Posts