Jump to content

What do you think of the US Forest Service's view on bigfoot?


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Backdoc said:

........That government dropped the ball silencing Patterson and Gimlin and their showing of the PGF.  I’ll just wait for the post suggesting Patterson was really poisoned........  

 

It is now proven that government didn't need to silence Patterson and Gimlin. All they needed to do was place tighter controls on access to the Bluff Creek area. 

 

BTW, the area is closed all winter long, when tracks in the snow can tell their tale. Every year.

 

You really don't have to "cover it up". All you have to do is officially ignore it and occasionally make a silly joke to make believers look stupid.

 

Quote

.........let’s keep it simple.  How could a “silencing government” act fast enough to stop an incident as my hypothetical scenario described?   What part specifically was so unlikely?  

 

Your scenario is fine, and if it went that way, it would essentially out the squelches. But, like I wrote, that's essentially what happened with Smeja, but without the videos and body parts, but of course, that's because he figured he'd be arrested...................and he was right...................

1 hour ago, norseman said:

.........Why does the government do this? 🤷🏻‍♂️

 

I could tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.  :lol:

  • Haha 1
Admin
Posted
34 minutes ago, Backdoc said:


 

Let’s put aside discussion about the UFO like incident itself you bring up.  I’ll even assume for the sake of discussion the incident is exactly as you describe for now.  
 

You are telling me your incident would accomplish a cover-up if those people all had cell phones and instant social media like today?!    No way.  
 

Take your scenario and add social media and cell phones of today.  It would be all over the news.  You would have all kinds of photos and video not some artist rendering from eyewitness accounts.  Surprised the eye witnesses exist since they should have been eliminated 

 

 I’m saying cell phones would matter.  Social media would matter.  You seem to be saying it wouldn’t.    


 

 I’ll debate the actual incident you refer to some other time.  Just admit you think if the exact same thing happened today all those cell phones and social media would be silenced.  All those witness would be silenced (?) even tough they were Not Silenced in your example incident.   
 

  I’m talking about shooting a Bigfoot.  I’m not taking about crashed flying saucers or whatever.   They are two different levels of concern.   I’m talking about modern happenings easily spreading like wildfire.  You say it wouldn’t based on something from 50 years ago.  

Can you just say what would happen today and stick to today?  Otherwise we will be going into all kinds of bunny trails way past the matter at hand.    

 


I have been trying to tell you what would happen today. I gave you an example of exactly what you said could NOT happen…..

 

So now you’re moving the goal posts? Not the same subject or now is different from then?

 

Social media is NOT the answer. Physical evidence is, and if a SWAT team has 20 guns leveled at me? I guess they are getting the body.

 

I will say this? Calling the authorities would be the LAST thing I would do.

 


 

 

Admin
Posted


Real or Fake?

 

Is it a biological life-form? Or a rubber dummy stuffed with pig guts?

 

I can say with complete conviction that it doesn't matter. Why? No physical evidence.

 

And that video has made the rounds on social media. It did not matter.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
10 hours ago, norseman said:

........Real or Fake?

 

Is it a biological life-form? Or a rubber dummy stuffed with pig guts?

 

I can say with complete conviction that it doesn't matter. Why? No physical evidence..........

 

This is especially true today. Video is too easily created deceptively. You simply can't believe what you see on video.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Regarding Bob Lazar........

 

(In his defense. ...)

 

 

  • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...