What do you think of the US Forest Service's view on bigfoot?

[Huntster]

3 minutes ago, Backdoc said:

No, I don’t actually.  
 

It’s not an issue where “records are not available to prove it either way”     
 

What does Hillary Clinton have to do with anything?  Many times, and maybe this is one of those times, she happens to be the favourite topic of certain people.   I suspect when she was able to practice law in Arkansas she had to provide copies of her diploma, grades, and so on.   Thus without my access to her personal papers I have to trust the bar of Arkansas who vetted her ability to take the test.........

 

LOL!

 

Okay, I had no idea you were so elementary in the ways of government. Here's your lesson. See how documentation can disappear (for Hillary, Bob Lazar, or even the Huntster):

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Rodham_senior_thesis

[Backdoc]

4 minutes ago, Huntster said:

 

LOL!

 

Okay, I had no idea you were so elementary in the ways of government. Here's your lesson. See how documentation can disappear (for Hillary, Bob Lazar, or even the Huntster):

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Rodham_senior_thesis

 

The insult is fine with me. Still, answer the question about Bob.   That’s who we are talking about.

 

Does Bob have 2 degrees 1 from MIT and one from Cal Tech.  
 

 

[Huntster]

14 minutes ago, Backdoc said:

The insult is fine with me.........

 

It wasn't meant as an Insult, but you have made it painfully so with your refusal to even look at the reference and understand the common point. I'll print it for you (and all) here as clearly as possible (that way you can't run from it):

 

If the government wants documentation to disappear, it disappears. Period. Easily. Completely or temporarily, as they so wish. My reference stands as evidence of that fact.

 

Quote

..........Still, answer the question about Bob.   That’s who we are talking about.

 

Does Bob have 2 degrees 1 from MIT and one from Cal Tech.  

 

Certainly. I'll answer it with the exact same words I used to answer it on the previous page:

 

Quote

..........Unknown. He says "Yes", but records are not available to prove either way..........

 

I'll comment further on my answer:

 

It doesn't matter one whit. 

 

You're trying to discredit Lazar by stating that he's lying about his education. You might be correct. But, as I've demonstrated, educational records can not only be disappeared completely, they can be made unavailable even while it can be claimed that they exist. They can even be made ghostlike. Untrustworthy. Is it real? Or is it Memorex?

 

It appears that Bob Lazar built a jet powered car out of an AMC Gremlin. Whether he learned that from a Mechanics Illustrated magazine or MIT or Cal Tech, he claims that somebody who saw his work invited him to this "job" in order to reverse-engineer a portion of this craft. I happen to know that both military branches and military contractors do this very kind of "recruiting" all the time. But I can't say that they do it to reverse engineer UFOs, because I don't particularly believe that UFOs exist.

 

Back to Bigfoot?:

 

A few federal agencies (U.S. Forest Service among them) and some state agencies (Alaska Department of Fish and Game among them) have published "statements" on the existence of Bigfoot. They run a similar theme: 

"It would be nice if they exist, but there's no proof that they do."

 

They are often published on April fools Day, or offer some other form of humor.

 

This is a common tactic of government and lawyers: instilling doubt.

 

And I'd like to ask you one final question, since you have well educated yourself on the PG film event:

 

Can you provide a single official statement by either the U.S, Forest Service (since the film was shot in Six Rivers National Forest) or the California Dept. of Fish and Game (who would be the agency responsible for managing wildlife in that forest) or the Bureau of Indian Affairs (since, if Sasquatches are human, they would be the agency negotiating with them)?

 

Any statement at all? Acknowledging the filming? Investigating the event? Even showing any interest at all in the event? 

 

A single word?

 

Yeah. I know. I've looked for it for decades. It doesn't exist, or it isn't available.

 

Has government of any kind (state/federal) conducted any investigation on the existence of Bigfoot anywhere at any time?

 

Yeah. I know. I've looked for decades. It doesn't exist. Local police have. Documented. Isn't that interesting?

 

Therefore:
 

IS THE GOVERNMENT HIDING SOMETHING?

 

[  ] Yes

[  ] No

 

Because they most certainly hid Hillary Clinton's thesis..............I just proved that...............but you weren't watching................

[Huntster]

Just cuz' I'm bored.........:

 

Feral people occasionally exist. I can prove it.

 

A feral human was even "mistaken" as an Almas in Asia. I can prove it.

 

So consider this AI statement on the question, "are feral people on public lands?":

 

Quote

The term "feral people" is a concept often circulated online, particularly on platforms like TikTok and YouTube, often associated with rumors and myths about national parks and other public lands

. However, it's important to understand that: 

There is little to no evidence supporting the existence of widespread "feral" or cannibalistic populations in US national parks or other public lands.

Most disappearances in national parks are due to factors like injuries, old age, and getting lost, rather than encounters with such mythical beings.

Park officials offer rational explanations for missing persons cases, based on the circumstances of the disappearance.

The idea of "feral people" is often seen as a hoax or fear-based theory, particularly linked to unfounded rumors. 

US Forest Service (USFS) perspective on public safety and managing interactions:

The USFS focuses on public safety and managing various interactions on national forests. Their guidance and actions center around: 

Addressing real concerns: This includes preventing and addressing illegal activities like drug production and theft, as well as providing guidance on how to report suspicious behavior.

Prioritizing visitor safety: They provide tips for safely visiting national parks and forests, such as staying aware of surroundings, reporting suspicious activity, and knowing how to contact authorities in emergencies.

Promoting respectful behavior: They advocate for treating everyone with respect and encourage positive interactions between visitors.

Enforcing regulations: The USFS enforces regulations to ensure a safe and enjoyable experience for all visitors, covering issues like vehicle operation, noise levels, and proper waste disposal.

Crime prevention: They encourage visitors to be vigilant and report any suspicious activity or criminal behavior they encounter, following a "Neighborhood Watch" approach in forest settings. 

In essence, while the idea of "feral people" on public lands is largely a myth, the USFS does address the reality of managing visitor safety and dealing with potential threats or illegal activities. They emphasize being aware of your surroundings and reporting any concerns or suspicious behavior to the appropriate authorities. 

 

Note the overall theme: discouraging the thought of feral people on public lands, ("largely a myth)", but encouraging you to report them if you see them.

 

Is this an official statement by the USFS? Ever see one by the USFS (or any other land management agency)? Can you google one up now?

 

I would think that folks could see through this stuff by now, but apparently not....................

[norseman]

1 hour ago, Backdoc said:

 

No, I don’t actually.  
 

It’s not an issue where “records are not available to prove it either way”     
 

What does Hillary Clinton have to do with anything?  Many times, and maybe this is one of those times, she happens to be the favourite topic of certain people.   I suspect when she was able to practice law in Arkansas she had to provide copies of her diploma, grades, and so on.   Thus without my access to her personal papers I have to trust the bar of Arkansas who vetted her ability to take the test.   
 

IF Bob claims to have 2 degrees he does not actually have what does that make him?

 

 

How about answering my yes or no Question and leave others out of it.

 

I’ll go where the facts take me.  I won’t ask the facts to go where I am and swat them away if I don’t like what they suggest.  

 

 

 

Fine.   What do YOU say? Does Bob have 2 degrees.  1 from MIT and one from Cal Tech?  

Stan Friedman contended that he did not.

 

So IF every thing we know is true about him working at Area 51, Element 115, filming test flights, etc?

 

Option 1: Either Bob Lazar lied his way on to a top secret base with fake credentials. (If that is true? What does that say about our national security!)

 

Option 2: The Government has whitewashed his past when he got caught filming the test flight. How do you square that he never worked at Los Alamos allegedly when him and his jet car are in the freakin newspaper? Oops. And this isn’t the first time people who have got cross with the government before had this happen to them. You have heard of men in black right?
 

And here is the kicker for me. I think George Knapp is beyond reproach as a journalist. I hold him in high regard. He seems to believe Bob Lazar. He broke his story. And the FBI raided his house…. So if Bob Lazar is just a lying nobody? What are they looking for?