What do you think of the US Forest Service's view on bigfoot?

[bipedalist]

@Huntster  Geesh you could write a book on the incidents and you can't make this sheet up! 

 

Wow, just Wow!

 

To stay on topic, Rich Germeau, co-founder of the Olympic Project and LEO Bigfoot Experiencer (interviewed on A Flash of Beauty) was on active patrol during one sighting.  Had others though too.  Would highly recommend reviewing his experiences as LEO and researcher. Not sure if his sightings were on Federal or state property but I know he had one experience near the Mason County WA line on/near an island in South Sound.  

 

 

Edited 1 hour ago by bipedalist

[georgerm]

11 hours ago, Huntster said:

No, times have changed. Photographic evidence isn't going to cut it.............

 

 

Weee...............wee............. ride the "derailment disappointment railroad to nowhere"...........oh by the way, "What do you think of the US Forest Service's view on bigfoot?" I know you are smart and must have some good ideas about this topic. 

 

The forest service must have endless detailed records on Sasquatch. Their top wildlife biologist know all about Sasquatch and most likely have been told not to discuss the issue until all the facts are known. I venture to say that a few of these wildlife biologists have observed bigfoot along with the woo factors as Tom Powel, a Portland, Oregon science teacher and others describe. Forest Service biologist are surely perplexed, so the forest service just states they are a creature of folklore. A this point they terminate the discussion probably because they are perplexed by standard bigfoot reports, and they know about the woo factor that accompanies about ten percent of credible sightings including my own experiences. This sounds ridiculous but some credible witnesses have seen bigfoot walking away and cloaking.................... yes, disappearing in a similar fashion as advanced nonhuman visitors. This is just the beginning of perplexing theories in regard to bigfoot. I will stop here since this is an approved divergence from the thread's topic which is, "what do you think is the forest service's view on bigfoot?" 

Edited 1 hour ago by georgerm

[Backdoc]

20 hours ago, georgerm said:

 

If the federal government calls bigfoot a mythical creature how long do you think some Joe Blow is going to be showing off his real bigfoot until the feds show up, take his computer, replace the body with a fake bigfoot and fine or imprison Joe? The feds know all about bigfoot.

If the feds know all about Bigfoot why isn't there a federal law covering the shooting or hunting of a Bigfoot?  Not a deal breaker but seems pretty curious.

[Backdoc]

14 hours ago, norseman said:

Such BS! Yes you are a victim of theft. 

 

This should be filed under the idea of "which is more likely"   The thing that is more likely is probably true if the other option is really far-fetched. 

[Backdoc]

12 hours ago, Huntster said:

 

 

 

 

#1  Love  the video.

 

#2  A few years from now it is going to get really difficult to tell what is fake and what is real.  This illustrates how good these vids are getting.  Imagine a video 20 years from now; especially one made for harmful purposes vs comedy purposes.  

[norseman]

36 minutes ago, Backdoc said:

If the feds know all about Bigfoot why isn't there a federal law covering the shooting or hunting of a Bigfoot?  Not a deal breaker but seems pretty curious.

Because that would require them to admit the creature is real.
 

Just like issuing a hunting permit or putting up a warning sign on a trail or handing out safety pamphlets. 

 

All of these things require the authorities to admit that a 800 lbs primate roams our woods and they have no control over it and more terrifyingly it outsmarts them most of the time.
 

If it was as dumb as a bear? It would already be in a zoo. If it was smarter than us? We would be in the zoo. Instead it fills a niche that terrifies Homo Sapiens. An ambush predator that loves thick cover. It is the “other” us. It’s in that “uncanny valley” state that robotics people talk about. It’s almost us, but it’s not us. And that terrifies humans. It’s why women used to feint when watching King Kong drag the dress torn woman to the top of the sky scraper. I think King Kong says an awful lot about humanity and our interaction with our closest living relatives over the last couple hundred thousand years.

 

And maybe this is also the answer we seek concerning the cover up? Or at least one of them? And once you start telling lies? You cannot stop.